Knicks · Knicks interest in Grant Hill and Jeff Foster (page 2)
Bonn1997@ 12/1/2011 1:48 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:We don't need Hill? Grant Hill would be the best SG on the team if he was signed. Who would you rather have in the rotation? Douglas?
When your best SG is an SF, it's not a good sign
Childs2Dudley@ 12/1/2011 1:52 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:We don't need Hill? Grant Hill would be the best SG on the team if he was signed. Who would you rather have in the rotation? Douglas?
When your best SG is an SF, it's not a good sign
Hill played SG for the Suns last year and is a tweener G/F. He is not a pure SF by any means.
Bonn1997@ 12/1/2011 2:09 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:We don't need Hill? Grant Hill would be the best SG on the team if he was signed. Who would you rather have in the rotation? Douglas?
When your best SG is an SF, it's not a good sign
Hill played SG for the Suns last year and is a tweener G/F. He is not a pure SF by any means.
I've always thought of him as much closer to an SF. I didn't watch him last year. But he's 6'8" and 39 years old. I have trouble imagining him being fast enough to guard a lot of the SGs.
Childs2Dudley@ 12/1/2011 2:11 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:We don't need Hill? Grant Hill would be the best SG on the team if he was signed. Who would you rather have in the rotation? Douglas?
When your best SG is an SF, it's not a good sign
Hill played SG for the Suns last year and is a tweener G/F. He is not a pure SF by any means.
I've always thought of him as much closer to an SF. I didn't watch him last year. But he's 6'8" and 39 years old. I have trouble imagining him being fast enough to guard a lot of the SGs.
martin@ 12/1/2011 2:15 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:We don't need Hill? Grant Hill would be the best SG on the team if he was signed. Who would you rather have in the rotation? Douglas?
When your best SG is an SF, it's not a good sign
Hill played SG for the Suns last year and is a tweener G/F. He is not a pure SF by any means.
you mean Hill played SG minutes after Richardson and Vince Carter, right?
Childs2Dudley@ 12/1/2011 2:16 PM
martin wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:We don't need Hill? Grant Hill would be the best SG on the team if he was signed. Who would you rather have in the rotation? Douglas?
When your best SG is an SF, it's not a good sign
Hill played SG for the Suns last year and is a tweener G/F. He is not a pure SF by any means.
you mean Hill played SG minutes after Richardson and Vince Carter, right?
I don't think you actually saw one minute of Grant Hill playing last year.
Go ask Suns fans if he can play SG.
Bonn1997@ 12/1/2011 2:21 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:We don't need Hill? Grant Hill would be the best SG on the team if he was signed. Who would you rather have in the rotation? Douglas?
When your best SG is an SF, it's not a good sign
Hill played SG for the Suns last year and is a tweener G/F. He is not a pure SF by any means.
I've always thought of him as much closer to an SF. I didn't watch him last year. But he's 6'8" and 39 years old. I have trouble imagining him being fast enough to guard a lot of the SGs.
I have to admit that that was impressive
martin@ 12/1/2011 2:26 PM
Childs2Dudley wrote:
martin wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:We don't need Hill? Grant Hill would be the best SG on the team if he was signed. Who would you rather have in the rotation? Douglas?
When your best SG is an SF, it's not a good sign
Hill played SG for the Suns last year and is a tweener G/F. He is not a pure SF by any means.
you mean Hill played SG minutes after Richardson and Vince Carter, right?
I don't think you actually saw one minute of Grant Hill playing last year.
Go ask Suns fans if he can play SG.
I know he can play SG and I did watch. Who cares.
Childs2Dudley@ 12/1/2011 2:27 PM
martin wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:
martin wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
Childs2Dudley wrote:We don't need Hill? Grant Hill would be the best SG on the team if he was signed. Who would you rather have in the rotation? Douglas?
When your best SG is an SF, it's not a good sign
Hill played SG for the Suns last year and is a tweener G/F. He is not a pure SF by any means.
you mean Hill played SG minutes after Richardson and Vince Carter, right?
I don't think you actually saw one minute of Grant Hill playing last year.
Go ask Suns fans if he can play SG.
I know he can play SG and I did watch. Who cares.
Okay.
BigDaddyG@ 12/1/2011 3:25 PM
The only issue I have with Foster is that he is injury prone. But he is a better option than Jared Jeffries. I think a platoon of Foster and Turiaf could get us at least 50-55 games in this strike shortened season. As for Grant Hill, he's a good player but he we already have a glut of wing players. It would be nice to have him on the team, but I think he'd be more of luxury signing at this point.
