Knicks · OT - Is D-Wil being swallowed up by the Swamps in Jersey ? (page 2)

eViL @ 1/12/2012 11:37 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
eViL wrote:ok. luckily, i actually know how to search this site:

Bonn1997 wrote:
eViL wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
MS wrote:Let's see what Melo does this season. We would have had the room to trade for chandler outright. Amare and Fields suffered after the trade.

Felton/Douglas
Fields/Iman
Gallo/Shawn Williams
Amare/AR
Chandler/Moz/Turiaf

That's a much more balanced team with a a lot of size and it keeps the team fresh for the playoffs.


Waiting to see what Melo does this year is the most reasonable assessment. Only a partisan fan would declare either team the definite victor of the trade at this point.

Don't ruin the buzz. Dudes running around pounding their chest claiming Dolan made the Nuggs his trade BITCH is way too good to reduce.

Some how the Nuggs exodus to china some how enhances our trade value?

The failure of one does not enhance the success of another.

you know, in light of what the Clippers and the Nets had to give up for their stars, i think the Knicks package was a relative bargain.


Those two are flawless PGs. There's no point in comparing what we gave up for Carmelo with what other teams gave up for true superstars.

source thread: http://mads.ultimateknicks.com/forum/top...

now how did i misquote you? you fucking jackass.

just because you backed off later doesn't mean you didn't say D-Will is flawless. telling me that i should "ask for clarification" after you said something that was completely and totally unambiguous is retarded.

honestly i wish i didn't respond to your blatantly trollish post. but then again, it's always gonna be fun to point out the flaws of these players you consider flawless.


OK, it's not that complicated: in the next post down, I corrected it by saying that I meant he had no major flaws. Other than to be a troll, why would you continuously quote someone's misstatement that they later corrected?
In the same thread just a few minutes later, I specifically clarified the comment to you. You seem like a politician who's trying to jump on any misstatement an opponent makes rather than a message board poster who wants to have a fair discussion.

Bonn1997 wrote:
eViL wrote:exactly, Paul has major injury concerns and Deron managed to run a hall-of-fame coach out of Utah before souring all of his relationships so much that the team swiftly shipped him out. injury problems for a apeedy guard and attitude problems for your team's general are serious flaws that i'm surprised someone with bonn's astute observational skills would miss.

Ask for clarification before you accuse someone of being wrong or not astute. All I meant was that unlike Carmelo, they do not have any major flaws in their on-the-court performance.


see. a well-adjusted, relatively normal person would say, "sorry. i misspoke." only you would suggest that someone needs clarification for something as unambiguous as the word "flawless." why should i have to ask for clarification? why don't you just fucking write what you mean instead of back tracking and saying that by "flawless" you mean "has no major flaws"? and you say i sound like a politician?? lol. are you so dense that you'd analogize me to a politician, while in the same post, trying to defend your own inability to convey ideas without requiring huge contortions of traditionally accepted meanings of simple words?

haha... you're a classic dude. very entertaining. and when i say "you," i mean "me responding to you." lol

nyk4ever @ 1/12/2012 11:42 AM
the only flawless thing d-will is doing right now is playing the part of a disgrunted employee. that 1.78 A/TO ratio sure ain't flawless...
Bonn1997 @ 1/12/2012 12:21 PM
nyk4ever wrote:the only flawless thing d-will is doing right now is playing the part of a disgrunted employee. that 1.78 A/TO ratio sure ain't flawless...

Since the injury (which I assumed was healed at the time), he's looked like garbage.
Bonn1997 @ 1/12/2012 12:26 PM
eViL wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
eViL wrote:ok. luckily, i actually know how to search this site:

Bonn1997 wrote:
eViL wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
MS wrote:Let's see what Melo does this season. We would have had the room to trade for chandler outright. Amare and Fields suffered after the trade.

Felton/Douglas
Fields/Iman
Gallo/Shawn Williams
Amare/AR
Chandler/Moz/Turiaf

That's a much more balanced team with a a lot of size and it keeps the team fresh for the playoffs.


Waiting to see what Melo does this year is the most reasonable assessment. Only a partisan fan would declare either team the definite victor of the trade at this point.

Don't ruin the buzz. Dudes running around pounding their chest claiming Dolan made the Nuggs his trade BITCH is way too good to reduce.

Some how the Nuggs exodus to china some how enhances our trade value?

The failure of one does not enhance the success of another.

you know, in light of what the Clippers and the Nets had to give up for their stars, i think the Knicks package was a relative bargain.


Those two are flawless PGs. There's no point in comparing what we gave up for Carmelo with what other teams gave up for true superstars.

source thread: http://mads.ultimateknicks.com/forum/top...

now how did i misquote you? you fucking jackass.

just because you backed off later doesn't mean you didn't say D-Will is flawless. telling me that i should "ask for clarification" after you said something that was completely and totally unambiguous is retarded.

honestly i wish i didn't respond to your blatantly trollish post. but then again, it's always gonna be fun to point out the flaws of these players you consider flawless.


OK, it's not that complicated: in the next post down, I corrected it by saying that I meant he had no major flaws. Other than to be a troll, why would you continuously quote someone's misstatement that they later corrected?
In the same thread just a few minutes later, I specifically clarified the comment to you. You seem like a politician who's trying to jump on any misstatement an opponent makes rather than a message board poster who wants to have a fair discussion.

Bonn1997 wrote:
eViL wrote:exactly, Paul has major injury concerns and Deron managed to run a hall-of-fame coach out of Utah before souring all of his relationships so much that the team swiftly shipped him out. injury problems for a apeedy guard and attitude problems for your team's general are serious flaws that i'm surprised someone with bonn's astute observational skills would miss.

Ask for clarification before you accuse someone of being wrong or not astute. All I meant was that unlike Carmelo, they do not have any major flaws in their on-the-court performance.


see. a well-adjusted, relatively normal person would say, "sorry. i misspoke." only you would suggest that someone needs clarification for something as unambiguous as the word "flawless." why should i have to ask for clarification? why don't you just fucking write what you mean instead of back tracking and saying that by "flawless" you mean "has no major flaws"? and you say i sound like a politician?? lol. are you so dense that you'd analogize me to a politician, while in the same post, trying to defend your own inability to convey ideas without requiring huge contortions of traditionally accepted meanings of simple words?

haha... you're a classic dude. very entertaining. and when i say "you," i mean "me responding to you." lol


WTF? I already clarified it for you twice and then is this (the third thread you've brought it up in) you still cited the initial post. At this point it looks like you're just being a dick. How many times could you possibly need clarification?
ChuckBuck @ 1/12/2012 12:36 PM
Never liked D-Will's game or attitude either. And yes he did chase Jerry Sloan out of Utah.
eViL @ 1/12/2012 12:42 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:WTF? I already clarified it for you twice and then is this (the third thread you've brought it up in) you still cited the initial post. At this point it looks like you're just being a dick. How many times could you possibly need clarification?

i don't need clarification. it's clear. you are a dingleberry. and you think Deron Williams is flawless. so glad we cleared that up. haha...

and for clarification purposes. by "dingleberry," i mean you are a little ball of poop dangling off of a pubic hair.

Bonn1997 @ 1/12/2012 1:49 PM
eViL wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:WTF? I already clarified it for you twice and then is this (the third thread you've brought it up in) you still cited the initial post. At this point it looks like you're just being a dick. How many times could you possibly need clarification?

i don't need clarification. it's clear. you are a dingleberry. and you think Deron Williams is flawless. so glad we cleared that up. haha...

and for clarification purposes. by "dingleberry," i mean you are a little ball of poop dangling off of a pubic hair.


Interesting description!
Page 2 of 2