Knicks · What Happens When The Knicks Finally Lose A Game? (page 3)

fishmike wrote:

Uptown wrote:

fishmike wrote:

Uptown wrote:

JrZyHuStLa wrote:When the Knicks finally lose a game, we'll see 10 new threads about how we should've kept Gallinari and Lin.

Yeah the bosom buddies will be in here ROFLOL'ding and dapping each other up with the "I told you so's" nonsense. Killa's post nailed my sentiments exactly......

only bosom buddies around here are the little fellas that occupy MElo's jock, and the parade of fools lined up to catch of whiff of his bunghole. The rest of the Knick fans will be ok with it.

Speaking for myself, I didn't follow Melo much when he played for the Nuggs. Now that he's down with us, I'm down with him. He represents the Knicks and his success or lack there of has a direct effect on W's and L's so I root for him and the others who wear the Blue and Orange to succeed. So in that sense, I'm a fan of his. But since when did being a fan of a player on your favorite team become a bad thing? Seriously, I was a big Mark Jackson fan when he ran the point for the Knicks. Even wore #13 in high school because of Mark. I guess that would make me a Mark Jackson jock rider.

no... shoving Mark Jackson is the MVP, the best PG in the league, a star who has only lacked a supporting cast down my throat and labeling me a hater if I resisted your kool aid would make you a jock rider. What you described was just being a fan.

Never seen anyone post that Melo is the best player in the league. There's a thread that states that he's an MVP candidate. Premature? Yes. Anything to get your panties in a bunch over? No. Just a Knick fan being a Knick fan.

Let me ask you this, would you have had a problem with someone constantly saying that Ewing, while in his prime, was the best player in the league? Should be the MVP? And was a star that didn't win it all because of his lack a supporting cast? Honestly, would you have flamed posters for constantly pushing that agenda?

Uptown wrote:

fishmike wrote:

Uptown wrote:

fishmike wrote:

Uptown wrote:

JrZyHuStLa wrote:When the Knicks finally lose a game, we'll see 10 new threads about how we should've kept Gallinari and Lin.

Yeah the bosom buddies will be in here ROFLOL'ding and dapping each other up with the "I told you so's" nonsense. Killa's post nailed my sentiments exactly......

only bosom buddies around here are the little fellas that occupy MElo's jock, and the parade of fools lined up to catch of whiff of his bunghole. The rest of the Knick fans will be ok with it.

Speaking for myself, I didn't follow Melo much when he played for the Nuggs. Now that he's down with us, I'm down with him. He represents the Knicks and his success or lack there of has a direct effect on W's and L's so I root for him and the others who wear the Blue and Orange to succeed. So in that sense, I'm a fan of his. But since when did being a fan of a player on your favorite team become a bad thing? Seriously, I was a big Mark Jackson fan when he ran the point for the Knicks. Even wore #13 in high school because of Mark. I guess that would make me a Mark Jackson jock rider.

no... shoving Mark Jackson is the MVP, the best PG in the league, a star who has only lacked a supporting cast down my throat and labeling me a hater if I resisted your kool aid would make you a jock rider. What you described was just being a fan.

Never seen anyone post that Melo is the best player in the league. There's a thread that states that he's an MVP candidate. Premature? Yes. Anything to get your panties in a bunch over? No. Just a Knick fan being a Knick fan.

Let me ask you this, would you have had a problem with someone constantly saying that Ewing, while in his prime, was the best player in the league? Should be the MVP? And was a star that didn't win it all because of his lack a supporting cast? Honestly, would you have flamed posters for constantly pushing that agenda?

When I was a little kid I actually did make that argument but what the fuck did I know, I was a little kid. If an adult tried to make the argument then that Ewing was the best, or now that Melo is, then I would lost some respect for them and I wouldn't trust that person's opinion on anything basketball related.

Mike Woodson has not lost two games in a row.

Another streak stays alive

gunsnewing wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:Looks like no one overreacted to the one loss. What have you learned earl?

I can be the one to overreact if thats what the forum wants

Trade Tyson
Fire Woody

They had an awful game!

A better overreaction would've been "FIRE TYSON! TRADE WOODY!"

NYKMentality wrote:What happens when the Knicks finally lose our first game? As a fan base, it's simple. We then A.) Acknowledge one of the greatest franchise starts to a single season followed by B.) Seeing how we respond, as a team, after a loss.

Not to quote myself, but quoted for truth.

We responded today.

Solace wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:Looks like no one overreacted to the one loss. What have you learned earl?

I can be the one to overreact if thats what the forum wants

Trade Tyson
Fire Woody

They had an awful game!

A better overreaction would've been "FIRE TYSON! TRADE WOODY!"

or....

"AMNESTY TYSON! HIRE ISAIAH! BENCH MELO! BENCH JR! WHY ISN'T WHITE PLAYING??!???"

jrodmc wrote:

Solace wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:Looks like no one overreacted to the one loss. What have you learned earl?

I can be the one to overreact if thats what the forum wants

Trade Tyson
Fire Woody

They had an awful game!

A better overreaction would've been "FIRE TYSON! TRADE WOODY!"

or....

"AMNESTY TYSON! HIRE ISAIAH! BENCH MELO! BENCH JR! WHY ISN'T WHITE PLAYING??!???"

Amnesty Tyson? That would be stupid. And, besides, we don't have one anymore.

I wish I can amnesty some colleagues.

Trade rumors abound.

Amar'e is on the clock.

misterearl wrote:The first time Mike Woodson loses two games in a row, which will be a FIRST for him as head coach of the New York Knicks, there will be panic.

Trade rumors abound.

Amar'e is on the clock.

IrishKnickFan wrote:

misterearl wrote:The first time Mike Woodson loses two games in a row, which will be a FIRST for him as head coach of the New York Knicks, there will be panic.

Trade rumors abound.

Amar'e is on the clock.

its amazing that woodson hasnt lost back to back games going back to last year. I bet even the almighty Phil couldnt do that with this team

Especially since our roster is flawed and sloppy.

IrishKnickFan wrote:

misterearl wrote:The first time Mike Woodson loses two games in a row, which will be a FIRST for him as head coach of the New York Knicks, there will be panic.

Trade rumors abound.

Amar'e is on the clock.

its amazing that woodson hasnt lost back to back games going back to last year. I bet even the almighty Phil couldnt do that with this team

Didn't we lose 2 games in a row in the playoffs with Woodson last year?

sorry, too lazy to Google it..

OjilEye wrote:

IrishKnickFan wrote:

misterearl wrote:The first time Mike Woodson loses two games in a row, which will be a FIRST for him as head coach of the New York Knicks, there will be panic.

Trade rumors abound.

Amar'e is on the clock.

its amazing that woodson hasnt lost back to back games going back to last year. I bet even the almighty Phil couldnt do that with this team

Didn't we lose 2 games in a row in the playoffs with Woodson last year?

sorry, too lazy to Google it..

Yes in the playoffs, but hasn't lost consecutive regular season games as Knicks head coach.

OjilEye wrote:

IrishKnickFan wrote:

misterearl wrote:The first time Mike Woodson loses two games in a row, which will be a FIRST for him as head coach of the New York Knicks, there will be panic.

Trade rumors abound.

Amar'e is on the clock.

its amazing that woodson hasnt lost back to back games going back to last year. I bet even the almighty Phil couldnt do that with this team

Didn't we lose 2 games in a row in the playoffs with Woodson last year?

sorry, too lazy to Google it..