FoeDiddy wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:Knicks a much better team with Wallace in there then Tyson (when he gets acclimated and comfortable)
All depends on matchup. But yes Rasheed is definitely a more skilled option. Against the more athletic bigs chandler is needed.
Knicks could actually play them both with Melo at the three against a bigger team...
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:we're shooting .37 from the field and 5-21 from 3 Up 14
yup
Honestly, when we shot this poorly under the last regime it was an automatic loss. Its great to have defense as our number 1 priority this year.
Also, Camby says get that weak stuff outta here!
4th Qtr 6:55
NYK 76 IND 60
VCoug wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:I am not a Felton fan but he has impressed me
Oh stop...Ur riding Brewer's jock and have no love for Felton...
wtf?
It's true..U rave about Brewer..Felton does work too...
I do. I love Brewer and don't love Felton. Whats wrong with that?
I also stated (above) that he (Felton) has impressed me.
Not sure what your point is. I don't have to like to eat monkey brains because you do.
What's wrong with that is Felton is my man!!!!!!
so tell him to raise his FG% pct and PER and play consistently smart this season and I can call him "my man" as well.
Some one peed in your cereal this morning??
You know, you're the one who started it. MrKnickShot said he was impressed by Felton. And then, apropos of nothing, you told him to stop and that he's riding Brewer's jock.
haha - SMH :-)
Hotfresh is a good dude but we often don't see eye to eye. He does not like when I diss his players and he often blindly supports them.
I don't thing that anyone is above criticism.
Wait, this is a blowout, right? Just wanted to make sure. . .
VCoug wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:I am not a Felton fan but he has impressed me
Oh stop...Ur riding Brewer's jock and have no love for Felton...
wtf?
It's true..U rave about Brewer..Felton does work too...
I do. I love Brewer and don't love Felton. Whats wrong with that?
I also stated (above) that he (Felton) has impressed me.
Not sure what your point is. I don't have to like to eat monkey brains because you do.
What's wrong with that is Felton is my man!!!!!!
so tell him to raise his FG% pct and PER and play consistently smart this season and I can call him "my man" as well.
Some one peed in your cereal this morning??
You know, you're the one who started it. MrKnickShot said he was impressed by Felton. And then, apropos of nothing, you told him to stop and that he's riding Brewer's jock.
I was actually trying to be funny because Knickshot and I have been back and forth on this topic a while now, just not today...This might be a good time to mind you own biz..
ramtour420 wrote:Wait, this is a blowout, right? Just wanted to make sure. . .
but it ain't beautiful basketball
HATE IT!
Uptown wrote:GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:we're shooting .37 from the field and 5-21 from 3 Up 14
yup
Honestly, when we shot this poorly under the last regime it was an automatic loss. Its great to have defense as our number 1 priority this year.
beating the spurs with melo 3-12. + IF we close this one out. so strange so strange.
holfresh wrote:VCoug wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:I am not a Felton fan but he has impressed me
Oh stop...Ur riding Brewer's jock and have no love for Felton...
wtf?
It's true..U rave about Brewer..Felton does work too...
I do. I love Brewer and don't love Felton. Whats wrong with that?
I also stated (above) that he (Felton) has impressed me.
Not sure what your point is. I don't have to like to eat monkey brains because you do.
What's wrong with that is Felton is my man!!!!!!
so tell him to raise his FG% pct and PER and play consistently smart this season and I can call him "my man" as well.
Some one peed in your cereal this morning??
You know, you're the one who started it. MrKnickShot said he was impressed by Felton. And then, apropos of nothing, you told him to stop and that he's riding Brewer's jock.
I was actually trying to be funny because Knickshot and I have been back and forth on this topic a while now, just not today...This might be a good time to mind you own biz..
Next time you should mention the fact that you're having a private conversation on a public forum. That way I'll know not to get involved.
Uptown wrote:ramtour420 wrote:NUPE wrote:IrishKnickFan wrote:VCoug wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:VCoug wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:NUPE wrote:This has been utterly brutal to watch, offensively. This is why I say the Knicks need Amar'e.
Who cares if its a brutal defensive game?
You want Amare in there so we can be down 46-26?
The 90's knicks were often brutal to watch but they made the opponent look more brutal.
I don't think this has been a good defensive game. I think both teams are just playing like shit offensively.
The game I'm watching is showing pretty solid knicks D
Solid not great. I'm seeing a ton of missed open jumpers.
holding a teami to 30 even when they are missing shots is good defense
It is not great d if a team is consistently missing wide open shots. Pacers are just shooting like crap. A lead is a lead. I will take it either way. I am just saying the D has not been great and the Knicks look weak on the boards again.
When you play great D consistently it gets into the opposing players psyche, they get thrown off their game. Then they miss even more open jumpers
Its called scouting. The Pacers have been a bad shooting team all year. The Knicks are taking away their strengths (interior play) and forcing them to win with their weakness (perimeter shooting). Its really that simple. Take away a strength and force them to rely on a weakness....
Its a pleasure to watch
Uptown wrote:GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:we're shooting .37 from the field and 5-21 from 3 Up 14
yup
Honestly, when we shot this poorly under the last regime it was an automatic loss. Its great to have defense as our number 1 priority this year.
+1,0000000000000000000000000000
Uptown wrote:ramtour420 wrote:NUPE wrote:IrishKnickFan wrote:VCoug wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:VCoug wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:NUPE wrote:This has been utterly brutal to watch, offensively. This is why I say the Knicks need Amar'e.
Who cares if its a brutal defensive game?
You want Amare in there so we can be down 46-26?
The 90's knicks were often brutal to watch but they made the opponent look more brutal.
I don't think this has been a good defensive game. I think both teams are just playing like shit offensively.
The game I'm watching is showing pretty solid knicks D
Solid not great. I'm seeing a ton of missed open jumpers.
holding a teami to 30 even when they are missing shots is good defense
It is not great d if a team is consistently missing wide open shots. Pacers are just shooting like crap. A lead is a lead. I will take it either way. I am just saying the D has not been great and the Knicks look weak on the boards again.
When you play great D consistently it gets into the opposing players psyche, they get thrown off their game. Then they miss even more open jumpers
Its called scouting. The Pacers have been a bad shooting team all year. The Knicks are taking away their strengths (interior play) and forcing them to win with their weakness (perimeter shooting). Its really that simple. Take away a strength and force them to rely on a weakness....
It is great having a prepared team.
4th Qtr 5:19
NYK 81 IND 62
Melo shouldn't have shot that 3 as the shot clock wound down. He should have just sat on it until the shot clock expired so that he doesn't mess up his Ts%, fg% and Bs%.....
Wow, that was filthy move by JR.
mrKnickShot wrote:ramtour420 wrote:Wait, this is a blowout, right? Just wanted to make sure. . .
but it ain't beautiful basketball
HATE IT!
Uptown wrote:Melo shouldn't have shot that 3 as the shot clock wound down. He should have just sat on it until the shot clock expired so that he doesn't mess up his Ts%, fg% and Bs%.....
must we troll during a blowout?
CrushAlot wrote:Uptown wrote:ramtour420 wrote:NUPE wrote:IrishKnickFan wrote:VCoug wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:VCoug wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:NUPE wrote:This has been utterly brutal to watch, offensively. This is why I say the Knicks need Amar'e.
Who cares if its a brutal defensive game?
You want Amare in there so we can be down 46-26?
The 90's knicks were often brutal to watch but they made the opponent look more brutal.
I don't think this has been a good defensive game. I think both teams are just playing like shit offensively.
The game I'm watching is showing pretty solid knicks D
Solid not great. I'm seeing a ton of missed open jumpers.
holding a teami to 30 even when they are missing shots is good defense
It is not great d if a team is consistently missing wide open shots. Pacers are just shooting like crap. A lead is a lead. I will take it either way. I am just saying the D has not been great and the Knicks look weak on the boards again.
When you play great D consistently it gets into the opposing players psyche, they get thrown off their game. Then they miss even more open jumpers
Its called scouting. The Pacers have been a bad shooting team all year. The Knicks are taking away their strengths (interior play) and forcing them to win with their weakness (perimeter shooting). Its really that simple. Take away a strength and force them to rely on a weakness....
It is great having a prepared team.
Amen bro....
mrKnickShot wrote:ramtour420 wrote:Wait, this is a blowout, right? Just wanted to make sure. . .
but it ain't beautiful basketball
HATE IT!
We're tryin' to win here! We'll work on beautiful the next game
