4th Qtr 11:27
NYK 70 IND 56
NUPE wrote:IrishKnickFan wrote:VCoug wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:VCoug wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:NUPE wrote:This has been utterly brutal to watch, offensively. This is why I say the Knicks need Amar'e.
Who cares if its a brutal defensive game?
You want Amare in there so we can be down 46-26?
The 90's knicks were often brutal to watch but they made the opponent look more brutal.
I don't think this has been a good defensive game. I think both teams are just playing like shit offensively.
The game I'm watching is showing pretty solid knicks D
Solid not great. I'm seeing a ton of missed open jumpers.
holding a teami to 30 even when they are missing shots is good defense
It is not great d if a team is consistently missing wide open shots. Pacers are just shooting like crap. A lead is a lead. I will take it either way. I am just saying the D has not been great and the Knicks look weak on the boards again.
When you play great D consistently it gets into the opposing players psyche, they get thrown off their game. Then they miss even more open jumpers
Ronnie Brewer got some pg skills
mrKnickShot wrote:VCoug wrote:Thank God, only one more quarter left.
You guys I guess did not enjoy the 90's knicks! They played ugly every game.
WINNING works for me - don't care how.
This game has nothing in common with those games.
I hope Cope gets in the game with some time left.
CrushAlot wrote:Brewer is awesome
Hotfresh?
Are these all "jock riders"?
Prigs and Rasheed , some nice connection there on the PnR !
Imagine that prigs pass to amare
Knicks a much better team with Wallace in there then Tyson (when he gets acclimated and comfortable)
FoeDiddy wrote:Imagine that prigs pass to amare
Priggy should throw the ball to the bench?
mrKnickShot wrote:Knicks a much better team with Wallace in there then Tyson (when he gets acclimated and comfortable)
How dare you?!
Sheed is playing well though
4th Qtr 8:58
NYK 74 IND 60
mrKnickShot wrote:Knicks a much better team with Wallace in there then Tyson (when he gets acclimated and comfortable)
All depends on matchup. But yes Rasheed is definitely a more skilled option. Against the more athletic bigs chandler is needed.
GodSaveTheKnicks wrote:Sheed is playing well though
His rebounding and scoring is incomparable.
mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:I am not a Felton fan but he has impressed me
Oh stop...Ur riding Brewer's jock and have no love for Felton...
wtf?
It's true..U rave about Brewer..Felton does work too...
I do. I love Brewer and don't love Felton. Whats wrong with that?
I also stated (above) that he (Felton) has impressed me.
Not sure what your point is. I don't have to like to eat monkey brains because you do.
What's wrong with that is Felton is my man!!!!!!
so tell him to raise his FG% pct and PER and play consistently smart this season and I can call him "my man" as well.
Some one peed in your cereal this morning??
we're shooting .37 from the field and 5-21 from 3
Up 14
yup
holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:holfresh wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:I am not a Felton fan but he has impressed me
Oh stop...Ur riding Brewer's jock and have no love for Felton...
wtf?
It's true..U rave about Brewer..Felton does work too...
I do. I love Brewer and don't love Felton. Whats wrong with that?
I also stated (above) that he (Felton) has impressed me.
Not sure what your point is. I don't have to like to eat monkey brains because you do.
What's wrong with that is Felton is my man!!!!!!
so tell him to raise his FG% pct and PER and play consistently smart this season and I can call him "my man" as well.
Some one peed in your cereal this morning??
You know, you're the one who started it. MrKnickShot said he was impressed by Felton. And then, apropos of nothing, you told him to stop and that he's riding Brewer's jock.
ramtour420 wrote:NUPE wrote:IrishKnickFan wrote:VCoug wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:VCoug wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:NUPE wrote:This has been utterly brutal to watch, offensively. This is why I say the Knicks need Amar'e.
Who cares if its a brutal defensive game?
You want Amare in there so we can be down 46-26?
The 90's knicks were often brutal to watch but they made the opponent look more brutal.
I don't think this has been a good defensive game. I think both teams are just playing like shit offensively.
The game I'm watching is showing pretty solid knicks D
Solid not great. I'm seeing a ton of missed open jumpers.
holding a teami to 30 even when they are missing shots is good defense
It is not great d if a team is consistently missing wide open shots. Pacers are just shooting like crap. A lead is a lead. I will take it either way. I am just saying the D has not been great and the Knicks look weak on the boards again.
When you play great D consistently it gets into the opposing players psyche, they get thrown off their game. Then they miss even more open jumpers
Its called scouting. The Pacers have been a bad shooting team all year. The Knicks are taking away their strengths (interior play) and forcing them to win with their weakness (perimeter shooting). Its really that simple. Take away a strength and force them to rely on a weakness....
FoeDiddy wrote:mrKnickShot wrote:Knicks a much better team with Wallace in there then Tyson (when he gets acclimated and comfortable)
All depends on matchup. But yes Rasheed is definitely a more skilled option. Against the more athletic bigs chandler is needed.
Knicks could actually play them both with Melo at the three against a bigger team...
