When all parties are healthy:
Novak being from Wisconsin & Felton for Brandon Jennings. The Bucks didn't give Jennings an extending contract and he always wanted to play in NY would Bucks take the bait ?
Is this possible scenario in the association or only in Fantasy basketball
Tell me what ya think
Probably not, it's not enough and they wanna to move Ellis.
Swap one 39% PG for another and lose Novak? I'd rather not.
Would you trade Novack for Dunlevy???
Anji wrote:Would you trade Novack for Dunlevy???
I wouldn't want to but I think I'd have to.
Sure both players would play for their hometown with an added incentive.
I was one of them that mourned when we didn't take Jennings in the draft and that in itself made me question Danphoney all the more.
Bonn1997 wrote:Swap one 39% PG for another and lose Novak? I'd rather not.
Jennings a California kid with Jason Kidd who he looked up to as becoming his mentor I'm all in.
The respect factor is huge Jennings is only 23 alot of wisdom and knowledge of the pro game can be transferred here .
a) Why the heck would the Bucks do that?
b) I don't like Jennings- he had one huge scoring game in his rookie year, and ever since then some Knick fans have seen him as being that good. For the most part he's been poor to average. Bad attitude, would be terrible for team chemistry, and I don't see him playing well with Melo.
can we please get a PG who can actually play the position correctly???
Milwaukee wouldn't go for that. Novak has very little value and Felton, taking into account what he pulled last time we traded him, probably has no value. Besides, I've never been a fan of Jennings anyway.
mrKnickShot wrote:can we please get a PG who can actually play the position correctly???
exactly.
in my opinion it's a bad call to go after a PG whose mentality is shoot first/pass second.
You cannot do that, especialy with guys like Melo, Amare and JR on the team.
I mean you could technicaly do that, but it wouldn't turn out so nice.
Even as much as I like Felton I think trading him for a PG that thrives off of assisting others would benefit the Knicks a lot.
Jennings > Felton & Novak
Jennings actually is becoming a very good PG. His problem is he doesn't have the physical size to impose his will on the opposing team nightly.
Jennings on a team like ours would be VERY deadly.
Bucks are 15-12 and that team is TERRIBLE.
Jennings salary demand higher than Novak/Felton?
Nalod wrote:Jennings salary demand higher than Novak/Felton?
In the open market he will probably get a nice contract. I assume since he is with Under Armour he would prefer to be in the NYC market.
Milwaukee isnt trading Jennings unless they get some real talent back and dump Gooden.
This trade would never take place because Bucks would not do it,
Jennings is all upside while Felton has pretty much peaked
Though I would love Jennings here over Felton, any day and all day on Monday
Honestly, the only way we can make a significant trade, such as for Jennings or Gerald Henderson or Paul Millsap, is by offering up Shumpert in deal or working out a multi-team deal involving Amare. No one is going to trade us one of their best players for guys like Felton, Novak, or Copeland.
VCoug wrote:Honestly, the only way we can make a significant trade, such as for Jennings or Gerald Henderson or Paul Millsap, is by offering up Shumpert in deal or working out a multi-team deal involving Amare. No one is going to trade us one of their best players for guys like Felton, Novak, or Copeland.
Basically. It would need to be part of a bigger deal.
I think the Bucks would be willing if they received combination of players to make them a guaranteed playoff team.
AnubisADL wrote:VCoug wrote:Honestly, the only way we can make a significant trade, such as for Jennings or Gerald Henderson or Paul Millsap, is by offering up Shumpert in deal or working out a multi-team deal involving Amare. No one is going to trade us one of their best players for guys like Felton, Novak, or Copeland.
Basically. It would need to be part of a bigger deal.
I think the Bucks would be willing if they received combination of players to make them a guaranteed playoff team.
I would prefer not to deal Shumpdawg, I see him as a Jordan Lite, we have not had this type of clamp-down defender since, I don't know, never.
Plus he can drop buckets if you need him to.
Honestly, I wouldn't do Shump for Jennings straight up, they need to add another player if they want Shump
IronWillGiroud wrote:AnubisADL wrote:VCoug wrote:Honestly, the only way we can make a significant trade, such as for Jennings or Gerald Henderson or Paul Millsap, is by offering up Shumpert in deal or working out a multi-team deal involving Amare. No one is going to trade us one of their best players for guys like Felton, Novak, or Copeland.
Basically. It would need to be part of a bigger deal.
I think the Bucks would be willing if they received combination of players to make them a guaranteed playoff team.
I would prefer not to deal Shumpdawg, I see him as a Jordan Lite, we have not had this type of clamp-down defender since, I don't know, never.
Plus he can drop buckets if you need him to.
Honestly, I wouldn't do Shump for Jennings straight up, they need to add another player if they want Shump
I wouldn't either. I'm just saying that any of these deals that are getting talked about would have to involve him or Amare
VCoug wrote:IronWillGiroud wrote:AnubisADL wrote:VCoug wrote:Honestly, the only way we can make a significant trade, such as for Jennings or Gerald Henderson or Paul Millsap, is by offering up Shumpert in deal or working out a multi-team deal involving Amare. No one is going to trade us one of their best players for guys like Felton, Novak, or Copeland.
Basically. It would need to be part of a bigger deal.
I think the Bucks would be willing if they received combination of players to make them a guaranteed playoff team.
I would prefer not to deal Shumpdawg, I see him as a Jordan Lite, we have not had this type of clamp-down defender since, I don't know, never.
Plus he can drop buckets if you need him to.
Honestly, I wouldn't do Shump for Jennings straight up, they need to add another player if they want Shump
I wouldn't either. I'm just saying that any of these deals that are getting talked about would have to involve him or Amare
It's true, as far as trade assets go, it's Shump and then Amar'e, I don't think anyone else would be traded, maybe as filler you can throw Novak in but I don't know if they want to do this,
AnubisADL wrote:Jennings > Felton & NovakJennings actually is becoming a very good PG. His problem is he doesn't have the physical size to impose his will on the opposing team nightly.
Jennings on a team like ours would be VERY deadly.
Bucks are 15-12 and that team is TERRIBLE.
Why does Felton get a roasting for his shooting, yet people pine after Jennings? Jennings is a career 39% shooter and averages 5.5 assists and 2.4 TO's per game. He has a lousy attitude too- I have never understood the love for him on these boards- is it because he had that one big scoring game on us 4 years ago?
