AnubisADL wrote:JR Smith isnt getting 10 million per. His main problem is he inconsistent. He will get a deal similar to Michael Beasely.JR Smith on a bad team would be terrible. JR Smith is an ideal 6th man on a good team.
Copeland isnt getting some huge offer from teams. The guy will get a minimum deal.
I disagree on both parts, JR Smith has grown/matured much this year, and now can START on many good teams
He is no longer just a scorer/6th man role like Crawford type that he was in the past, he has expanded all area's of his game from penetration, DEF, facilitating, rebounding, and is still not reached his "prime"
With Eric Gordon getting a max deal coming of his rookie contract and injury, I think Smith is just much better
So if Gordon can get a deal paying him 12-15m at a multi year deal, I think teams will pay Smith a 2 year deal in the range of 10 per year
Smith is similar to OJ Mayo in terms of OFFENSE
but he is much more complete and better on DEF
comparable players are Rudy Gay, Paul George, Iggy *he might not have the size/length/potential of George/Gay but he is up there in terms of athleticism* OJ Mayo
Copeland can range anywhere from 2-5m area, while I think it will be closer to 2-3m, I think it is very reasonable for a stretch 5, that can play PF, and a little small SF
With Danny Green making about 4.5m a year, I can totally see San Antoni making a reasonable offer of 2-3m per year
It is very reasonable, he reminds of Kleiza but with more skill, and SA can hide his defense inabilities while utilizing/fit his skills/ability to stretch the floor with ball movement/penetration/player movement/high IQ players/post option/ and TEAM WORK
He is not just a 3point shooter, he also has mid range/off the dribble, decent post game, good handle *that can take it to the rim if you try to defend his shot at PF/C*, and good IQ... know's how to play OFF THE BALL/uses his ability to earn a step for his team or wide open shot
He can play as a bench's #1 option or a 2/3 option, or be that guy just to space the floor