Off Topic · Manhunt for suspect in marathon bombing updates (page 4)

playa2 @ 4/23/2013 9:36 PM
Georgia Senator. Saxby Chambliss told Channel 2 Action News late Tuesday afternoon that a law enforcement agency may have had information in advance of the Boston bombings that wasn't properly shared.

http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/cha...

He should stay away from flying in a small plane.

Nalod @ 4/23/2013 10:50 PM
playa2 wrote:
Solace wrote:
Nalod wrote:
playa2 wrote:

Anyone who ever watched a movie in the last decade should know that ANY video can be manufactured in cgi, let alone edited or tampered with. I don't have a point deeper than a well funded organization, such as FBI, CIA, DHS etc.. can show us absolutely anything they desire, or say confiscate every ones video and return or publish it modified.

Some of it is pretty good stuff, but this one is really lame.

Bottom line is if you think its a conspiracy in the first hour (like your boy Alex Jones does) then every you can't explain must be a conspiracy. Its all your looking for. All inconsistancies. Sandy hook was really a lame conspiracy.

How many years will it take for the "new world order" to take place? Seems by now they would have figured it out. Who are "they" and how do they profit and when?

Not one shread of legit media ever goes after this? No foreign journalist? Al Jazeera? If there is a conspiracy to shut them up, then why do the "alternative" press" get to do it? Whouldn't it be real easy to shut them down? Or is that part of the conspiracy too. We got "conspiracies for the Conspiracies?"

I agree with you, Nalod. Actually, people started posting this stuff on Facebook. The main reasoning why they say it's a cover up: to distract us from CISPA. What I don't get is that these things makes absolutely no sense and you would have to get a significant collaboration of people to go along with basically agreeing to attack their own country and to arrest/kill the wrong men. But despite that, I did some research, and most of the conspiracy theories were already debunked on snopes.

There was something about the backpacks not matching, which I thought was vaguely interesting.

The media, the government, the International bankers, Hollywood, and Academia are all part of the same incestuous complex. The media is part of the conspiracy, so why would you expect them to tell you the truth?

The corruption doesn't come from the outside-in. It comes from the top-down. If the ownership of a major media organization decides that a certain story is to be spiked, or if another story is to be hyped, then the rest of the organization follows. If a low level reporter decides to defy his bosses, he will lose his job and be blacklisted.

Remember Helen Thomas?

After 50 years as a White House Correspondent, she was dumped like a hot potato for publicly criticizing Israel. The same fearful top-down control works in government and academia as well.

Wha?

HOw do bankers, media, and hollywood profit from it?

playa2 @ 4/24/2013 5:57 AM
You wouldn't care if I told you, this info is only for people who care , not those who ask lame questions but never address the info presented. You are asking shill questions that wouldn't be answered.
Nalod @ 4/24/2013 7:04 AM
playa2 wrote:You wouldn't care if I told you, this info is only for people who care , not those who ask lame questions but never address the info presented. You are asking shill questions that wouldn't be answered.

Info for people that "Care"?

Perfect. Thought it was for people that were open minded? Really what your saying is "for people that have come to the conclusion and need to keep finding ways to justify it".

FYI, I read your stuff and watched the videos. Its not convincing. I suppose I don't want to believe it either. You want to believe it and thus you do.

Kind of like religion. "Faith is an unsubstantiated belief"!

We not talking about the origin of a religion, these are making accusations at the first moment the media reports with the conclusion already determined. Alex Jones did the same thing in Sandy Hook and much of it was explained in the days/weeks after. Im sure you think it was "they" who also covered their tracks. Fact is Alex Jones is getting rich.

playa2 @ 4/24/2013 7:56 AM
Nalod wrote:
playa2 wrote:You wouldn't care if I told you, this info is only for people who care , not those who ask lame questions but never address the info presented. You are asking shill questions that wouldn't be answered.

Info for people that "Care"?

Perfect. Thought it was for people that were open minded? Really what your saying is "for people that have come to the conclusion and need to keep finding ways to justify it".

FYI, I read your stuff and watched the videos. Its not convincing. I suppose I don't want to believe it either. You want to believe it and thus you do.

People who care HAVE an open mind.

You don't believe it? Or You don't WANT to believe it?

There's a big difference between the two. The human mind is filled with complexes, one of which is the desire to shield itself from unpleasant truths. You're afraid that if you look into this, you might see that it's true. And you're especially afraid that if you come to agree with me, you too will then become marginalized as a "conspiracy theorist." LOL

It is FEAR that is causing you to close your mind and act like a sheep. Grow a pair and stop being so closed minded!

Why haven't you made any comments on what you seem to be possibly true ? Give me an example , if you have nothing to say go back to the knicks talk, this isn't for you bro.

playa2 @ 4/24/2013 8:18 AM
Why did he avoid the question ?

Don't the people of Boston and the rest of Americans need to know!

Look how the cop( BEHIND THE FBI GUY) with the frets on his hat reacts when the question is asked by journalist. Goes for the nose dig/ scratch.

Nalod @ 4/24/2013 8:28 AM
playa2 wrote:Why did he avoid the question ?

Don't the people of Boston and the rest of Americans need to know!

First 30 seconds you get it. "Why did he ignore the question?"

Conclusion must be "conspiracy".

Maybe depends on who is asking, how its asked, and by press with credentials.

Nalod @ 4/24/2013 9:59 AM

The media, the government, the International bankers, Hollywood, and Academia are all part of the same incestuous complex. The media is part of the conspiracy, so why would you expect them to tell you the truth?

If your trying to control people isn't the media one of the first things that would be taken out?

If so, isn't that a conflict of interest?

If the Media is part of the conspiracy then why wouldn't "sources" like Infowars try to expose it?

How does "liberal" hollywood stand to profit from the new world order? Wouldn't "Academia" be removed in the NEw world order?

Im trying to be open minded here but I find those entities would have inherent conflicts of interest?

The burden of proof is on the accuser.

playa2 @ 4/24/2013 10:21 AM
Nalod wrote:
playa2 wrote:Why did he avoid the question ?

Don't the people of Boston and the rest of Americans need to know!

First 30 seconds you get it. "Why did he ignore the question?"

Conclusion must be "conspiracy".

Maybe depends on who is asking, how its asked, and by press with credentials.

I think it shows the denial by ignoring the Question as invalid. The reaction from the question is why people question these in Law Enforcement.

Those in attendance looked concerned when the question was asked.

No footage from the surveillance camera, why it would have shown everything like who dropped the BAG. Did you notice that ?

Here the same kind of off guard question and the response tells it all. He wasn't smart enough to switch gears like the FBI guy.

Problem is it wasn't funny 3000 Americans died.

playa2 @ 4/24/2013 2:53 PM
MOST DAMNING EVIDENCE SEEN SO FAR

http://imgur.com/a/Nx8EU

How did the older brother end up dead when they have pictures of him on the ground face down with his hands out to his sides in surrender position ?

Nalod @ 4/24/2013 3:28 PM
playa2 wrote:MOST DAMNING EVIDENCE SEEN SO FAR

http://imgur.com/a/Nx8EU

Wow! Its all just so real!

Those troops still in the streets or they go home?

playa2 @ 4/24/2013 3:29 PM
Eyewitness says Boston suspect was run over by Police SUV

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/...

playa2 @ 4/24/2013 3:33 PM
Nalod wrote:
playa2 wrote:MOST DAMNING EVIDENCE SEEN SO FAR

http://imgur.com/a/Nx8EU

Wow! Its all just so real!

Those troops still in the streets or they go home?


You are giving yourself away with these shill comments. Nobody else is carrying on like you, but many are reading this thread. Hmmmm
Nalod @ 4/24/2013 3:45 PM
I could be the ONLY one reading your "research"!
Nalod @ 4/24/2013 3:46 PM
playa2 @ 4/24/2013 3:49 PM
Nalod wrote:I could be the ONLY one reading your "research"!


Not true sir many are reading and comparing to what MSM is telling them. People are waking up, there has been way too many coincidences. Even some high school drop out can see that !

playa2 @ 4/24/2013 3:52 PM
playa2 wrote:Eyewitness says Boston suspect was run over by Police SUV

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/...

Did anybody hear this ladies testimony ????

playa2 @ 4/24/2013 8:18 PM
This 19 year old must be a highly-trained terror agent with decades of urban combat experience, advanced EOD skills, and ranked among the top tier when it comes to escape and evasion tactics. Perhaps we should respond with hellfire missiles, a few drones, and SEAL Team 6 to catch him.

Funny enough, they're searching door to door, because they believe this dangerous guy would enter someone's home or business. However, the same state doesn't want the residents to have access to firearms to protect their families if their suspicions are right!

playa2 @ 4/24/2013 8:44 PM

Interesting. The patch is clearly seen.

playa2 @ 4/25/2013 8:36 AM
If these last two clips don't get you to start thinking , nothing will.

]

Nalod @ 4/25/2013 11:59 AM
At 3:45 it falls apart because there is not logical reason other than the installation of some minor bills.

Marshall law and ecampment is really bad for buisness.

I get the promotion of fear to motivate funding for military and homeland security.

The question is what is done when you empower a governement. Does it get used for evil or good?

Most wars are economic based and I do agree we fabricate events to properly motivate into action. Why? We are a melting pot of different culture under one roof and don't have a "nationalistic" tendancy to bind together. For instance the brits are british, French are french, Germans are germans. Each with its own unique qualities. Americans are from everywhere.

Civil war was not about Slavery, but the economics of it in the face human atrocity! WWI was about Euro debt. WW2 was complicated but Axis powers Germany and Japan making land grabs to expand its economic might which would isolate our economy that was failing at the time and would not have survived. I get it.

Other than fear, I don't get the end game for the Theorists. Its really quite vague.

BTW, I can't wrap my head on some aspects of 9/11. I get the fear part. Some things are just not explainable there.

Im open minded but not to a gov't plot to take over and make camps. Is it reasonable to have them in the event of a horrific biological event where millions die? Sad to say, it might. If a regional disaster like Katrina but 100x worse happens im afraid some things might be necessary. A nuclear event? Ugly stuff. Governments job is to be prepared?

Until someone can give me logic to why then I can't buy into it. Thats where lots of theories collapse in my opinion.

Page 4 of 8