NBA · George Karl, Coach of the Year (page 2)
Nalod wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Nalod wrote:how many coaches have coached in 185 playoff games?Gotta be pretty good to get there!
Is any coach that has coached that many playoff games "terrible"?
How many have 80 wins?
COY is not a "lifetime achievement award", its for this past regular season.
If Woodson has gotten better thru experience, so too might have Karl!
Is he a great playoff coach? has he done a bad job in some of those years? Yeah, I think he might have.
Is he a terrible playoff coach? Maybe he is so good getting to the playoffs with teams that might not be playoff winning caliber that he his record becomes a victim of regular season success.
No, he is not "awful" or "sucks balls"! I can't label him a great playoff coach either.
Stop raining praise on that loser, he doesn't deserve it.
Greg Popovich, on the other hand, deserves every bouquet thrown his way.
123 Wins - 77 losses, .615 winning percentage, 4 rings.
To take a cue from my boy 3G4G, END OF SCUSSIN!
We not talking about Pop? Not unless your deflecting!
We talking about Karl and your interpretation.
Its your thread, you stated your opinion and if you wish to discuss, thats fine. You have holes in your arguement because Melo is too much part of Karls playoff record.
Melo playoff record in NY so far? 6-11
Is NY better with Melo than without. Yes. Is Denver better without Melo. Yes.
Win-win!
Deflect what? Karl and Pop coached roughly the same about of playoff games(185 to 200). One's a winner, one's a loser.
Big enough sample size(shout out to Bonn).
End result, George Karl is a fraud, loser, no adjustment making postseason coach.
Like I said earlier, he'll win you upwards of 50+ games, sometimes 60+(Thanks GP!) in the regular season, but when it comes down to the real coaching, when micromanaging every possesion counts, he doesn't answer the bell.
But according to you, he's GGGRRREEAAATT! 
ChuckBuck wrote:Deflect what? Karl and Pop coached roughly the same about of playoff games(185 to 200). One's a winner, one's a loser.Big enough sample size(shout out to Bonn).
End result, George Karl is a fraud, loser, no adjustment making postseason coach.
Like I said earlier, he'll win you upwards of 50+ games, sometimes 60+(Thanks GP!) in the regular season, but when it comes down to the real coaching, when micromanaging every possesion counts, he doesn't answer the bell.
But according to you, he's GGGRRREEAAATT!
This is about this dumbest argument and comparison and conclusion I have seen in a long time. One coach just had Tim Duncan his whole career and the other, well, hasn't. And you want to compare records straight up? Rosters count.
martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Deflect what? Karl and Pop coached roughly the same about of playoff games(185 to 200). One's a winner, one's a loser.Big enough sample size(shout out to Bonn).
End result, George Karl is a fraud, loser, no adjustment making postseason coach.
Like I said earlier, he'll win you upwards of 50+ games, sometimes 60+(Thanks GP!) in the regular season, but when it comes down to the real coaching, when micromanaging every possesion counts, he doesn't answer the bell.
But according to you, he's GGGRRREEAAATT!This is about this dumbest argument and comparison and conclusion I have seen in a long time. One coach just had Tim Duncan his whole career and the other, well, hasn't. And you want to compare records straight up? Rosters count.
Coaching doesn't matter?
How did Thibodeau end up beating Brooklyn on the road in game 7 and stealing game 1 from Miami?
I know it's a players league and what not, but one could argue, no one had more talent and depth than the LA Clippers, and they just got beat by star-less Memphis Grizzlies team.
Is Lionel Hollins a great coach? I'd say better than average, not great.
Is Vinny Del Negro that bad of a coach. HELLL's YES with a capital H!
End point, Karl is a good regular season coach. He doesn't make the necessary adjustments in playoff games against comparable coaches when it counts.
Mark Jackson took Karl to school.
ChuckBuck wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Deflect what? Karl and Pop coached roughly the same about of playoff games(185 to 200). One's a winner, one's a loser.Big enough sample size(shout out to Bonn).
End result, George Karl is a fraud, loser, no adjustment making postseason coach.
Like I said earlier, he'll win you upwards of 50+ games, sometimes 60+(Thanks GP!) in the regular season, but when it comes down to the real coaching, when micromanaging every possesion counts, he doesn't answer the bell.
But according to you, he's GGGRRREEAAATT!This is about this dumbest argument and comparison and conclusion I have seen in a long time. One coach just had Tim Duncan his whole career and the other, well, hasn't. And you want to compare records straight up? Rosters count.
Coaching doesn't matter?
How did Thibodeau end up beating Brooklyn on the road in game 7 and stealing game 1 from Miami?
I know it's a players league and what not, but one could argue, no one had more talent and depth than the LA Clippers, and they just got beat by star-less Memphis Grizzlies team.
Is Lionel Hollins a great coach? I'd say better than average, not great.
Is Vinny Del Negro that bad of a coach. HELLL's YES with a capital H!
End point, Karl is a good regular season coach. He doesn't make the necessary adjustments in playoff games against comparable coaches when it counts.
Mark Jackson took Karl to school.
Never said coaching doesn't matter. Said rosters count too. So do injuries and salary cap and everything else. It's just not about 1 part.
martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Deflect what? Karl and Pop coached roughly the same about of playoff games(185 to 200). One's a winner, one's a loser.Big enough sample size(shout out to Bonn).
End result, George Karl is a fraud, loser, no adjustment making postseason coach.
Like I said earlier, he'll win you upwards of 50+ games, sometimes 60+(Thanks GP!) in the regular season, but when it comes down to the real coaching, when micromanaging every possesion counts, he doesn't answer the bell.
But according to you, he's GGGRRREEAAATT!This is about this dumbest argument and comparison and conclusion I have seen in a long time. One coach just had Tim Duncan his whole career and the other, well, hasn't. And you want to compare records straight up? Rosters count.
Coaching doesn't matter?
How did Thibodeau end up beating Brooklyn on the road in game 7 and stealing game 1 from Miami?
I know it's a players league and what not, but one could argue, no one had more talent and depth than the LA Clippers, and they just got beat by star-less Memphis Grizzlies team.
Is Lionel Hollins a great coach? I'd say better than average, not great.
Is Vinny Del Negro that bad of a coach. HELLL's YES with a capital H!
End point, Karl is a good regular season coach. He doesn't make the necessary adjustments in playoff games against comparable coaches when it counts.
Mark Jackson took Karl to school.
Never said coaching doesn't matter. Said rosters count too. So do injuries and salary cap and everything else. It's just not about 1 part.
Fair enough. Some may see the Denver Nuggets overachieved under Karl's coaching in winning 57 games with a style that's more ABA and gimmicky, run and up and down in elevated mile high altitudes for 48 minutes.
Unfortunately, for all his coaching genius in the regular season, his success rarely translates into the 2nd season when it counts.
3 seed with home court. Only injury to Gallo, and the superior David Lee was out, so I'll generously call that a wash.
Only point I'm trying to make is nobody does less with more than George Karl in the playoffs, and that's being generous.
ChuckBuck wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Deflect what? Karl and Pop coached roughly the same about of playoff games(185 to 200). One's a winner, one's a loser.Big enough sample size(shout out to Bonn).
End result, George Karl is a fraud, loser, no adjustment making postseason coach.
Like I said earlier, he'll win you upwards of 50+ games, sometimes 60+(Thanks GP!) in the regular season, but when it comes down to the real coaching, when micromanaging every possesion counts, he doesn't answer the bell.
But according to you, he's GGGRRREEAAATT!This is about this dumbest argument and comparison and conclusion I have seen in a long time. One coach just had Tim Duncan his whole career and the other, well, hasn't. And you want to compare records straight up? Rosters count.
Coaching doesn't matter?
How did Thibodeau end up beating Brooklyn on the road in game 7 and stealing game 1 from Miami?
I know it's a players league and what not, but one could argue, no one had more talent and depth than the LA Clippers, and they just got beat by star-less Memphis Grizzlies team.
Is Lionel Hollins a great coach? I'd say better than average, not great.
Is Vinny Del Negro that bad of a coach. HELLL's YES with a capital H!
End point, Karl is a good regular season coach. He doesn't make the necessary adjustments in playoff games against comparable coaches when it counts.
Mark Jackson took Karl to school.
Never said coaching doesn't matter. Said rosters count too. So do injuries and salary cap and everything else. It's just not about 1 part.
Fair enough. Some may see the Denver Nuggets overachieved under Karl's coaching in winning 57 games with a style that's more ABA and gimmicky, run and up and down in elevated mile high altitudes for 48 minutes.
Unfortunately, for all his coaching genius in the regular season, his success rarely translates into the 2nd season when it counts.
3 seed with home court. Only injury to Gallo, and the superior David Lee was out, so I'll generously call that a wash.
Only point I'm trying to make is nobody does less with more than George Karl in the playoffs, and that's being generous.
not saying you chuck, but i think alot of people forget that karl coached the sonics to alot of success and he did have the players (kemp payon mcmillan perkins schrempf)
it all goes into the recipe.
ChuckBuck wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Deflect what? Karl and Pop coached roughly the same about of playoff games(185 to 200). One's a winner, one's a loser.Big enough sample size(shout out to Bonn).
End result, George Karl is a fraud, loser, no adjustment making postseason coach.
Like I said earlier, he'll win you upwards of 50+ games, sometimes 60+(Thanks GP!) in the regular season, but when it comes down to the real coaching, when micromanaging every possesion counts, he doesn't answer the bell.
But according to you, he's GGGRRREEAAATT!This is about this dumbest argument and comparison and conclusion I have seen in a long time. One coach just had Tim Duncan his whole career and the other, well, hasn't. And you want to compare records straight up? Rosters count.
Coaching doesn't matter?
How did Thibodeau end up beating Brooklyn on the road in game 7 and stealing game 1 from Miami?
I know it's a players league and what not, but one could argue, no one had more talent and depth than the LA Clippers, and they just got beat by star-less Memphis Grizzlies team.
Is Lionel Hollins a great coach? I'd say better than average, not great.
Is Vinny Del Negro that bad of a coach. HELLL's YES with a capital H!
End point, Karl is a good regular season coach. He doesn't make the necessary adjustments in playoff games against comparable coaches when it counts.
Mark Jackson took Karl to school.
Never said coaching doesn't matter. Said rosters count too. So do injuries and salary cap and everything else. It's just not about 1 part.
Fair enough. Some may see the Denver Nuggets overachieved under Karl's coaching in winning 57 games with a style that's more ABA and gimmicky, run and up and down in elevated mile high altitudes for 48 minutes.
Unfortunately, for all his coaching genius in the regular season, his success rarely translates into the 2nd season when it counts.
3 seed with home court. Only injury to Gallo, and the superior David Lee was out, so I'll generously call that a wash.
Only point I'm trying to make is nobody does less with more than George Karl in the playoffs, and that's being generous.
Chuck, your all about playoff results to qualify your coaching ranking. Its your thing.
What about Mark Jax seemingly underperforming during the regular season? What about him getting a healthy bogut on the floor to play meaningful minutes? YOur missing intangables, too easy to wash out Gallo for Dlee and call it a day.
Maybe they should have coach of the year inclusive of the playoffs.
Karl is coach of the year. Get over it.
Nalod wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Deflect what? Karl and Pop coached roughly the same about of playoff games(185 to 200). One's a winner, one's a loser.Big enough sample size(shout out to Bonn).
End result, George Karl is a fraud, loser, no adjustment making postseason coach.
Like I said earlier, he'll win you upwards of 50+ games, sometimes 60+(Thanks GP!) in the regular season, but when it comes down to the real coaching, when micromanaging every possesion counts, he doesn't answer the bell.
But according to you, he's GGGRRREEAAATT!This is about this dumbest argument and comparison and conclusion I have seen in a long time. One coach just had Tim Duncan his whole career and the other, well, hasn't. And you want to compare records straight up? Rosters count.
Coaching doesn't matter?
How did Thibodeau end up beating Brooklyn on the road in game 7 and stealing game 1 from Miami?
I know it's a players league and what not, but one could argue, no one had more talent and depth than the LA Clippers, and they just got beat by star-less Memphis Grizzlies team.
Is Lionel Hollins a great coach? I'd say better than average, not great.
Is Vinny Del Negro that bad of a coach. HELLL's YES with a capital H!
End point, Karl is a good regular season coach. He doesn't make the necessary adjustments in playoff games against comparable coaches when it counts.
Mark Jackson took Karl to school.
Never said coaching doesn't matter. Said rosters count too. So do injuries and salary cap and everything else. It's just not about 1 part.
Fair enough. Some may see the Denver Nuggets overachieved under Karl's coaching in winning 57 games with a style that's more ABA and gimmicky, run and up and down in elevated mile high altitudes for 48 minutes.
Unfortunately, for all his coaching genius in the regular season, his success rarely translates into the 2nd season when it counts.
3 seed with home court. Only injury to Gallo, and the superior David Lee was out, so I'll generously call that a wash.
Only point I'm trying to make is nobody does less with more than George Karl in the playoffs, and that's being generous.
Chuck, your all about playoff results to qualify your coaching ranking. Its your thing.
What about Mark Jax seemingly underperforming during the regular season? What about him getting a healthy bogut on the floor to play meaningful minutes? YOur missing intangables, too easy to wash out Gallo for Dlee and call it a day.
Maybe they should have coach of the year inclusive of the playoffs.
Karl is coach of the year. Get over it.
I've been over with. I know Coach of the Year is solely based on regular season success.
I've already pointed out his postseason futility, proving that his regular season award really is a misnomer for him.
Bogut should've been more than checked for by the 7 footers Koufos and McGee, no?
The only intangibles in this playoff series is execution by the players and coaching. Karl failed in the latter.
ChuckBuck wrote:Nalod wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Deflect what? Karl and Pop coached roughly the same about of playoff games(185 to 200). One's a winner, one's a loser.Big enough sample size(shout out to Bonn).
End result, George Karl is a fraud, loser, no adjustment making postseason coach.
Like I said earlier, he'll win you upwards of 50+ games, sometimes 60+(Thanks GP!) in the regular season, but when it comes down to the real coaching, when micromanaging every possesion counts, he doesn't answer the bell.
But according to you, he's GGGRRREEAAATT!This is about this dumbest argument and comparison and conclusion I have seen in a long time. One coach just had Tim Duncan his whole career and the other, well, hasn't. And you want to compare records straight up? Rosters count.
Coaching doesn't matter?
How did Thibodeau end up beating Brooklyn on the road in game 7 and stealing game 1 from Miami?
I know it's a players league and what not, but one could argue, no one had more talent and depth than the LA Clippers, and they just got beat by star-less Memphis Grizzlies team.
Is Lionel Hollins a great coach? I'd say better than average, not great.
Is Vinny Del Negro that bad of a coach. HELLL's YES with a capital H!
End point, Karl is a good regular season coach. He doesn't make the necessary adjustments in playoff games against comparable coaches when it counts.
Mark Jackson took Karl to school.
Never said coaching doesn't matter. Said rosters count too. So do injuries and salary cap and everything else. It's just not about 1 part.
Fair enough. Some may see the Denver Nuggets overachieved under Karl's coaching in winning 57 games with a style that's more ABA and gimmicky, run and up and down in elevated mile high altitudes for 48 minutes.
Unfortunately, for all his coaching genius in the regular season, his success rarely translates into the 2nd season when it counts.
3 seed with home court. Only injury to Gallo, and the superior David Lee was out, so I'll generously call that a wash.
Only point I'm trying to make is nobody does less with more than George Karl in the playoffs, and that's being generous.
Chuck, your all about playoff results to qualify your coaching ranking. Its your thing.
What about Mark Jax seemingly underperforming during the regular season? What about him getting a healthy bogut on the floor to play meaningful minutes? YOur missing intangables, too easy to wash out Gallo for Dlee and call it a day.
Maybe they should have coach of the year inclusive of the playoffs.
Karl is coach of the year. Get over it.
I've been over with. I know Coach of the Year is solely based on regular season success.
I've already pointed out his postseason futility, proving that his regular season award really is a misnomer for him.
Bogut should've been more than checked for by the 7 footers Koufos and McGee, no?The only intangibles in this playoff series is execution by the players and coaching. Karl failed in the latter.
Bogut is better than both.
martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Deflect what? Karl and Pop coached roughly the same about of playoff games(185 to 200). One's a winner, one's a loser.Big enough sample size(shout out to Bonn).
End result, George Karl is a fraud, loser, no adjustment making postseason coach.
Like I said earlier, he'll win you upwards of 50+ games, sometimes 60+(Thanks GP!) in the regular season, but when it comes down to the real coaching, when micromanaging every possesion counts, he doesn't answer the bell.
But according to you, he's GGGRRREEAAATT!This is about this dumbest argument and comparison and conclusion I have seen in a long time. One coach just had Tim Duncan his whole career and the other, well, hasn't. And you want to compare records straight up? Rosters count.
which is why I say look at Karl when he had Gary Payton... Went to the finals with Him and Kemp..
tkf wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Deflect what? Karl and Pop coached roughly the same about of playoff games(185 to 200). One's a winner, one's a loser.Big enough sample size(shout out to Bonn).
End result, George Karl is a fraud, loser, no adjustment making postseason coach.
Like I said earlier, he'll win you upwards of 50+ games, sometimes 60+(Thanks GP!) in the regular season, but when it comes down to the real coaching, when micromanaging every possesion counts, he doesn't answer the bell.
But according to you, he's GGGRRREEAAATT!This is about this dumbest argument and comparison and conclusion I have seen in a long time. One coach just had Tim Duncan his whole career and the other, well, hasn't. And you want to compare records straight up? Rosters count.
which is why I say look at Karl when he had Gary Payton... Went to the finals with Him and Kemp..
I think Chuck deducts that Karl failed to lead melo to the finals in 8 years.
Nalod wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Nalod wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:martin wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Deflect what? Karl and Pop coached roughly the same about of playoff games(185 to 200). One's a winner, one's a loser.Big enough sample size(shout out to Bonn).
End result, George Karl is a fraud, loser, no adjustment making postseason coach.
Like I said earlier, he'll win you upwards of 50+ games, sometimes 60+(Thanks GP!) in the regular season, but when it comes down to the real coaching, when micromanaging every possesion counts, he doesn't answer the bell.
But according to you, he's GGGRRREEAAATT!This is about this dumbest argument and comparison and conclusion I have seen in a long time. One coach just had Tim Duncan his whole career and the other, well, hasn't. And you want to compare records straight up? Rosters count.
Coaching doesn't matter?
How did Thibodeau end up beating Brooklyn on the road in game 7 and stealing game 1 from Miami?
I know it's a players league and what not, but one could argue, no one had more talent and depth than the LA Clippers, and they just got beat by star-less Memphis Grizzlies team.
Is Lionel Hollins a great coach? I'd say better than average, not great.
Is Vinny Del Negro that bad of a coach. HELLL's YES with a capital H!
End point, Karl is a good regular season coach. He doesn't make the necessary adjustments in playoff games against comparable coaches when it counts.
Mark Jackson took Karl to school.
Never said coaching doesn't matter. Said rosters count too. So do injuries and salary cap and everything else. It's just not about 1 part.
Fair enough. Some may see the Denver Nuggets overachieved under Karl's coaching in winning 57 games with a style that's more ABA and gimmicky, run and up and down in elevated mile high altitudes for 48 minutes.
Unfortunately, for all his coaching genius in the regular season, his success rarely translates into the 2nd season when it counts.
3 seed with home court. Only injury to Gallo, and the superior David Lee was out, so I'll generously call that a wash.
Only point I'm trying to make is nobody does less with more than George Karl in the playoffs, and that's being generous.
Chuck, your all about playoff results to qualify your coaching ranking. Its your thing.
What about Mark Jax seemingly underperforming during the regular season? What about him getting a healthy bogut on the floor to play meaningful minutes? YOur missing intangables, too easy to wash out Gallo for Dlee and call it a day.
Maybe they should have coach of the year inclusive of the playoffs.
Karl is coach of the year. Get over it.
I've been over with. I know Coach of the Year is solely based on regular season success.
I've already pointed out his postseason futility, proving that his regular season award really is a misnomer for him.
Bogut should've been more than checked for by the 7 footers Koufos and McGee, no?The only intangibles in this playoff series is execution by the players and coaching. Karl failed in the latter.
Bogut is better than both.
Seriously? Bogut? Besides the 14 pt 21 rebound 3 assist 4 block game in the GSW clinching victory, the rest of the series he was merely pedestrian, look it up.
He had a solid 1st game vs San An padded by 2 OT's worth of play.
Bogut only makes a few million more than McGee, shouldn't he(Javale McGee) be close in production and stature?