Knicks · Officiating. (page 2)
StarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.
NardDogNation wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.
Men with hands tied behind their backs don't drop 39 points,
NardDogNation wrote:How about Game 1 3 and 4 were those all giftwrapped too? Look im the biggest Knick fan out there but i call it like it is. The refs were bad tonight but they arent the reason we are going home. If the Knicks showed up in Games 1 3 and 4 we could have won this seriesStarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.
IronWillGiroud wrote:NardDogNation wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.Men with hands tied behind their backs don't drop 39 points,
they planned to tie all other hands behind the back except for melo's,
StarksEwing1 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:How about Game 1 3 and 4 were those all giftwrapped too? Look im the biggest Knick fan out there but i call it like it is. The refs were bad tonight but they arent the reason we are going home. If the Knicks showed up in Games 1 3 and 4 we could have won this seriesStarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.
You are not wrong but the refs were not good all series. The definitely favored Indy's style. Ny could not play the same way. The constant barking at the refs ALL F#@#ing season may have something to with it.
StarksEwing1 wrote:But you do admit they were bad.NardDogNation wrote:How about Game 1 3 and 4 were those all giftwrapped too? Look im the biggest Knick fan out there but i call it like it is. The refs were bad tonight but they arent the reason we are going home. If the Knicks showed up in Games 1 3 and 4 we could have won this seriesStarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.
NardDogNation wrote:For the record, I got it wrong. The free throw disparity was 46 to 18; not 40-18. So it was a Shaq rape no lube, not a Shaq rape with lube.
And that's on top of the 33-17 disparity in the last game.seriously remember Ed Malloys name, he pulls this crap all the time- remember game 1 vs the Heat last year? That was him...
StarksEwing1 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:How about Game 1 3 and 4 were those all giftwrapped too? Look im the biggest Knick fan out there but i call it like it is. The refs were bad tonight but they arent the reason we are going home. If the Knicks showed up in Games 1 3 and 4 we could have won this seriesStarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.
Irish, Is it possible for the Knicks to play poorly in game 1,3,and 4 and the refs officiated the game poorly???
We still could have and should have won. Woody was slow to adjust his bad plans, and JR and Tyson and J. Kidd were no-shows.
Game 6 Iman scores 16 in a quarter and doesn't shoot again for the rest of the game. Part of that is the refs with the BS foul calls, the other part coaching.
Vmart wrote:NardDogNation wrote:This was one of the worst officiated games I've ever seen; on par with the Kings-Lakers back in the day. All you have to do is look at the free throw disparity and fouls called disparity. We shot about 18 free throws and they shot 40. There is no fucking way a team that physical pulls that off. Ultimately, the refeering improved in the 2nd half but that doesn't say much considering how abyssmal it was to start. I mean, they called two phantom fouls against Shumpert and Martin in the final minutes of the game, which NEVER get called. The league needs to investigate these guys because I'm sure there are a few Tim Donaghey's in the bunch.Don't think the league wasn't in on it.
Exactly. League knows the ratings for the ECF will be much higher if the most populous city in the country isn't represented.
KnicksChick wrote:UM....I have always said that they were bad tonight. I never defended them but they arent the reason we are going home. Im not afraid to call out the knicks for Games 1 3 and 4StarksEwing1 wrote:But you do admit they were bad.NardDogNation wrote:How about Game 1 3 and 4 were those all giftwrapped too? Look im the biggest Knick fan out there but i call it like it is. The refs were bad tonight but they arent the reason we are going home. If the Knicks showed up in Games 1 3 and 4 we could have won this seriesStarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.
holfresh wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:How about Game 1 3 and 4 were those all giftwrapped too? Look im the biggest Knick fan out there but i call it like it is. The refs were bad tonight but they arent the reason we are going home. If the Knicks showed up in Games 1 3 and 4 we could have won this seriesStarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.Irish, Is it possible for the Knicks to play poorly in game 1,3,and 4 and the refs officiated the game poorly???
I like that 'Irish'
holfresh wrote:Im 100% italian dude. anyway i am not defending the refsStarksEwing1 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:How about Game 1 3 and 4 were those all giftwrapped too? Look im the biggest Knick fan out there but i call it like it is. The refs were bad tonight but they arent the reason we are going home. If the Knicks showed up in Games 1 3 and 4 we could have won this seriesStarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.Irish, Is it possible for the Knicks to play poorly in game 1,3,and 4 and the refs officiated the game poorly???
IronWillGiroud wrote:NardDogNation wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.Men with hands tied behind their backs don't drop 39 points,
No but apparently teams do.
StarksEwing1 wrote:holfresh wrote:Im 100% italian dude. anyway i am not defending the refsStarksEwing1 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:How about Game 1 3 and 4 were those all giftwrapped too? Look im the biggest Knick fan out there but i call it like it is. The refs were bad tonight but they arent the reason we are going home. If the Knicks showed up in Games 1 3 and 4 we could have won this seriesStarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.Irish, Is it possible for the Knicks to play poorly in game 1,3,and 4 and the refs officiated the game poorly???
that's not the point, he's taking a not so subtle jab at what he views as your supposedly genetically predisposed perspective on the quality of officiating
StarksEwing1 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:How about Game 1 3 and 4 were those all giftwrapped too? Look im the biggest Knick fan out there but i call it like it is. The refs were bad tonight but they arent the reason we are going home. If the Knicks showed up in Games 1 3 and 4 we could have won this seriesStarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.
Listen, I know the Knicks had their faults. I've even mentioned that the Pacers are the deeper team. But its ridiculous IMO to sit here and pretend like the refs did not have an overwhelming impact in the dictating who won the game, which wasn't based on merit.
NardDogNation wrote:Again the knicks could have won this series if they played much better despite the refs. Once again Im NOT defending the refs.StarksEwing1 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:How about Game 1 3 and 4 were those all giftwrapped too? Look im the biggest Knick fan out there but i call it like it is. The refs were bad tonight but they arent the reason we are going home. If the Knicks showed up in Games 1 3 and 4 we could have won this seriesStarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.Listen, I know the Knicks had their faults. I've even mentioned that the Pacers are the deeper team. But its ridiculous IMO to sit here and pretend like the refs had an overwhelming impact in the dictating who won the game, which wasn't based on merit.
StarksEwing1 wrote:This is very true as well.NardDogNation wrote:Again the knicks could have won this series if they played much better despite the refs. Once again Im NOT defending the refs.StarksEwing1 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:How about Game 1 3 and 4 were those all giftwrapped too? Look im the biggest Knick fan out there but i call it like it is. The refs were bad tonight but they arent the reason we are going home. If the Knicks showed up in Games 1 3 and 4 we could have won this seriesStarksEwing1 wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:It was obvious from the 1st game. Hibbert was getting away with killing everyone in the paint. NY got called for touch fouls all series. The FT discrepancy was horrible all series and tonight much worse. 40-18???? really?Again the main reason the knicks lost was because they were awdul in Games 1 3 and 4.
With that the team could have won.
Bull. I don't by the "fall on one's sword stuff". Its like tying a man's hand behind his back and then blame him for having a weak jab. That being said, we definitely had our faults and I think Indiana is the deeper team but this game was gift wrapped.Listen, I know the Knicks had their faults. I've even mentioned that the Pacers are the deeper team. But its ridiculous IMO to sit here and pretend like the refs had an overwhelming impact in the dictating who won the game, which wasn't based on merit.
markvmc wrote:Vmart wrote:NardDogNation wrote:This was one of the worst officiated games I've ever seen; on par with the Kings-Lakers back in the day. All you have to do is look at the free throw disparity and fouls called disparity. We shot about 18 free throws and they shot 40. There is no fucking way a team that physical pulls that off. Ultimately, the refeering improved in the 2nd half but that doesn't say much considering how abyssmal it was to start. I mean, they called two phantom fouls against Shumpert and Martin in the final minutes of the game, which NEVER get called. The league needs to investigate these guys because I'm sure there are a few Tim Donaghey's in the bunch.Don't think the league wasn't in on it.
Exactly. League knows the ratings for the ECF will be much higher if the most populous city in the country isn't represented.
No one said that the league is rigged and since I was the one to suggest foul play was at hand, I'm going to assume this sarcastic comment is directed at me. Re-read what I said. If you do, then you'll see that I think the refs were dirty and dirty shit happens even if guys at the top are not involved. My case and point was Tim Donaghey who was supposedly a lone wolf. So save the sarcastic remarks until you follow what is being said.
VCoug wrote:Vmart wrote:NardDogNation wrote:This was one of the worst officiated games I've ever seen; on par with the Kings-Lakers back in the day. All you have to do is look at the free throw disparity and fouls called disparity. We shot about 18 free throws and they shot 40. There is no fucking way a team that physical pulls that off. Ultimately, the refeering improved in the 2nd half but that doesn't say much considering how abyssmal it was to start. I mean, they called two phantom fouls against Shumpert and Martin in the final minutes of the game, which NEVER get called. The league needs to investigate these guys because I'm sure there are a few Tim Donaghey's in the bunch.Don't think the league wasn't in on it.
Right. The NBA desperately wanted the small market NY Knicks to lose to the large market Indiana Pacers to setup the greatly anticipated Miami-Indy ECF.
For a large market team they got jack to show for banners.