Knicks · Tyreke Evans (page 1)

I think Tyreke might be a great signing. I think he's unrestricted FA. He'd be great at the 2/3. I've said this before, Tyreke would be awesome. He'd have to sign for the mid-level. Melo needs to get involved in recruiting.

Keep Shump.

Grunwald already said no sign and trades this summer. So we cant get him until next January.

However, beggars can't be choosers and if he isn't resigned I guess he'd be worth the risk

2/3/4 of some combination of Evans, Shump, Melo has potential except when it comes to hitting the glass

SupremeCommander wrote:Tyreke Evans is not a player I'd normally be interested in... don't like his approach

However, beggars can't be choosers and if he isn't resigned I guess he'd be worth the risk

2/3/4 of some combination of Evans, Shump, Melo has potential except when it comes to hitting the glass

AnubisADL wrote:Tyreke Evans is a restricted free agents and he played well this year.

Grunwald already said no sign and trades this summer. So we cant get him until next January.

I though he said he'd be agressive and creative in trying to improve the roster but, The CORE would return. I guess that means fringe guys like Novak are on the block.

NYKBocker wrote:Watched all Rocket games and saw Evans a bit. Not impressed. Dude has no shot.

48% overall and 34% from 3 is something I could work with.

yellowboy90 wrote:

NYKBocker wrote:Watched all Rocket games and saw Evans a bit. Not impressed. Dude has no shot.

48% overall and 34% from 3 is something I could work with.

Actually, those numbers aren't that bad. I did not know his numbers. I just judged it basing on the times he played the Rockets.

yellowboy90 wrote:Side note Would you trade Chandler for Cousins?

NYKBocker wrote:Watched all Rocket games and saw Evans a bit. Not impressed. Dude has no shot.

he's on the kings. thats why you saw nothing

NYKBocker wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:

NYKBocker wrote:Watched all Rocket games and saw Evans a bit. Not impressed. Dude has no shot.

48% overall and 34% from 3 is something I could work with.

Actually, those numbers aren't that bad. I did not know his numbers. I just judged it basing on the times he played the Rockets.

He still has a ways to go on his mid range but he is showing signs of improvement with his long ball

Caseloads wrote:

SupremeCommander wrote:Tyreke Evans is not a player I'd normally be interested in... don't like his approach

However, beggars can't be choosers and if he isn't resigned I guess he'd be worth the risk

2/3/4 of some combination of Evans, Shump, Melo has potential except when it comes to hitting the glass

His approach sucks because the Kings are terrible. He has great talent. Lance Stevenson would not abuse him.

Lance Stephenson wouldn't abuse Shump

yellowboy90 wrote:he is looking better on O but he suffered playing the 3 on D. I wouldn't mind a double S& T of Smith and Evans. I don't think that is possible though.

Bonn1997 wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:he is looking better on O but he suffered playing the 3 on D. I wouldn't mind a double S& T of Smith and Evans. I don't think that is possible though.

Yeah, he actually has had among the worst defensive ratings in the whole league each year. He gives up far more than he produces on offense.

yellowboy90 wrote:

Bonn1997 wrote:

yellowboy90 wrote:he is looking better on O but he suffered playing the 3 on D. I wouldn't mind a double S& T of Smith and Evans. I don't think that is possible though.

Yeah, he actually has had among the worst defensive ratings in the whole league each year. He gives up far more than he produces on offense.

u know his ratings the previous years when playing the 1 or 2