Off Topic · TWA Flight 800 Taken Down by Missile? (page 2)

For you intellectuals conformist, remember Rome was destroyed FROM WITHIN

playa2 wrote:For you intellects conformist, remember Rome was destroyed FROM WITHIN

Thats weak bro, real week.

Labeling and generalizing is weak.

This is what you need to see to understand. Feds told Hanger worker not to take a picture.

watched about a half hour of it and it is well produced.

I gather that they don't go into scenarios as to who or why it happened?

Do they speculate to why the FBI was so heavy into this?

I'll take a stab:

It goes against the "fear" factor. Theory that gov't likes to have shootings to freak people out and keep them "In line" but air traffic fear slows the economy down so its possible it was a terror attack off a boat and they wanted to keep it hush hush. Was there an effort to find a boat that could have launched the missile?

Its possible the Navy shot it down but why? Was there some one so valuable they had to get rid of that plane to get it done? Was this plane shot down over water rather than over land? Was there a 9/11 event about to happen and the plane was shot down rather than occur more civilian body count on land or allowed to crash into a NY city land mark?

Ok, I got the part of the movie where the FBI was changing the evidence which is weird. Its obvious they were "covering things up". What were they protecting and why?

Nalod wrote:watched about a half hour of it and it is well produced.

I gather that they don't go into scenarios as to who or why it happened?

Do they speculate to why the FBI was so heavy into this?

I'll take a stab:

It goes against the "fear" factor. Theory that gov't likes to have shootings to freak people out and keep them "In line" but air traffic fear slows the economy down so its possible it was a terror attack off a boat and they wanted to keep it hush hush. Was there an effort to find a boat that could have launched the missile?

Its possible the Navy shot it down but why? Was there some one so valuable they had to get rid of that plane to get it done? Was this plane shot down over water rather than over land? Was there a 9/11 event about to happen and the plane was shot down rather than occur more civilian body count on land or allowed to crash into a NY city land mark?

Ok, I got the part of the movie where the FBI was changing the evidence which is weird. Its obvious they were "covering things up". What were they protecting and why?

I don't have every missing piece of this puzzle. But I have enough pieces to KNOW that the government-media version is false! I may not be able to answer the question you asked. Watch the clip in 30 min intervals watching only 30 min tells me you haven't seen enough to post and speculate what you think happened. I've given you enough information it's laid out for you to know that the official story is a lie. Does that make sense to you?

Trust me Nalod you will never get out of me the answer to who done it and why.

I KNOW WHY YOU ASK THOSE SAME SPECIFIC QUESTIONS ALL THE TIME are you sure you don't have LEA friends . LOL

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:watched about a half hour of it and it is well produced.

I gather that they don't go into scenarios as to who or why it happened?

Do they speculate to why the FBI was so heavy into this?

I'll take a stab:

It goes against the "fear" factor. Theory that gov't likes to have shootings to freak people out and keep them "In line" but air traffic fear slows the economy down so its possible it was a terror attack off a boat and they wanted to keep it hush hush. Was there an effort to find a boat that could have launched the missile?

Its possible the Navy shot it down but why? Was there some one so valuable they had to get rid of that plane to get it done? Was this plane shot down over water rather than over land? Was there a 9/11 event about to happen and the plane was shot down rather than occur more civilian body count on land or allowed to crash into a NY city land mark?

Ok, I got the part of the movie where the FBI was changing the evidence which is weird. Its obvious they were "covering things up". What were they protecting and why?

I don't have every missing piece of this puzzle. But I have enough pieces to KNOW that the government-media version is false! I may not be able to answer the question you asked. Watch the clip in 30 min intervals watching only 30 min tells me you haven't seen enough to post and speculate what you think happened. I've given you enough information it's laid out for you to know that the official story is a lie. Does that make sense to you?

Trust me Nalod you will never get out of me the answer to who done it and why.

I KNOW WHY YOU ASK THOSE SAME SPECIFIC QUESTIONS ALL THE TIME are you sure you don't have LEA friends . LOL

Can't answer the unknown with "Its a conspiracy".

There is logic to why kennedy was killed, logic to why Pearl Harbor was attacked, why we entered WW1, WW2, Vietnam beyond what we learned in childhood text books.

TWA 800 I can guess was kept hush hush to not install fear which if flights stop installs fear and stalls the economy.

But then you go on about Sandy hook, Boston, Aurorora being done to Put in fear as a way of keeping people in line, train them for marshall law and the eventual incarceration of millions so a few can live in a utopian type existence.

No evidence other than connecting the dots over hundereds of years with the end result being that this will take place in the future.

I would think such acts of selfishness by evil people would want to live to benefit this act, not keep putting it off into the very distant future. If you can't come up with plausible effects from such awful acts then there is no cred.

You ever heard of human will = resistance .

Getting dumbed down will take decades of re-programming how we think as a people.

If everything was out in the open , how would they be able to continue ?

playa2 wrote:
Getting dumbed down will take...

no one 'gets' dumbed down, you do this alone

playa2 wrote:You ever heard of human will = resistance .

Getting dumbed down will take decades of re-programming how we think as a people.

If everything was out in the open , how would they be able to continue ?

"They"?

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:You ever heard of human will = resistance .

Getting dumbed down will take decades of re-programming how we think as a people.

If everything was out in the open , how would they be able to continue ?

"They"?

"They" are the ones that keep you informed on what to say to the people about the programming to dumb down citizens. Thank God for the ones that resist.

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:You ever heard of human will = resistance .

Getting dumbed down will take decades of re-programming how we think as a people.

If everything was out in the open , how would they be able to continue ?

"They"?

"They" are the ones that keep you informed on what to say to the people about the programming to dumb down citizens. Thank God for the ones that resist.

Are you one that resists?

playa2 wrote:You ever heard of human will = resistance .

Getting dumbed down will take decades of re-programming how we think as a people.

If everything was out in the open , how would they be able to continue ?

Well, it's taken 40 years for the LGBT crowd, but they seem ready and able to continue, out in the open. So to speak. Just about everyone's been preprogrammed to think of them as a "race", with little to no analysis of that concept. An example of true populace re-programming, complete.

If the populace is being geared up for war that will end up lining "their" pockets by allowing terrorist attacks on the populace, why is the stock market already at 15K while we're removing troops from the two "wars" we're engaged in?

The military is being defanged, with women now being forced upon special forces, and we have an entire entitlement victim generation that makes the '60's era look like a conformist revolution. It's no longer do or die, it's gear up, sit down, tweet, turn around and think about a reasoned solution to each and every "engagement".

3 US submarines were in the area (USS Trepang, Albuquerque, and Wyoming) and the USS Teddy Roosevelt?

The Wyoming was out in the area on sea trials at the time, and the CO and XO were BOTH relieved of command very shortly after TWA 800 went down.

It is also important to note that a Petty Officer aboard the USS Trepang that night did come forward (after retirement) and say that the Navy shot down TWA but he retracted his statements after the Navy threatened his pension. Former press Secretary to JFK also came forward after getting into contact with parents of a Seaman aboard one of the boats who called home and said they shot down TWA. The Government attacked Salinger's credibility saying it was a desperate attempt to revive his career. There is also the rocket fuel found embedded in TWA seats as well as explosives used in our missile warheads.

even senior NTSB officials have created a documentary that is airing next month cliaming that the Navy shot TWA down. It has been proven that the Navy was putting heavily modified stingers on Los Angeles Class subs (USS Albuqurque) during the 90's (Those documents were obtained utilizing the freedom of information act). Also the IDAS system is built specifically for subs to shoot down aircraft. Both Israel and the UK have surface to air capabilities on their subs.

playa2 wrote:3 US submarines were in the area (USS Trepang, Albuquerque, and Wyoming) and the USS Teddy Roosevelt?

The Wyoming was out in the area on sea trials at the time, and the CO and XO were BOTH relieved of command very shortly after TWA 800 went down.

Random Murder? Someone on that plane that justifies killing everyone? Put fear into people but tell everyone its was not a terror act but malfunction? Rouge sub?

So it was just a screw up? Incompetence with a subsequent cover up?

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:3 US submarines were in the area (USS Trepang, Albuquerque, and Wyoming) and the USS Teddy Roosevelt?

The Wyoming was out in the area on sea trials at the time, and the CO and XO were BOTH relieved of command very shortly after TWA 800 went down.

Random Murder? Someone on that plane that justifies killing everyone? Put fear into people but tell everyone its was not a terror act but malfunction? Rouge sub?

So it was just a screw up? Incompetence with a subsequent cover up?

You don't have a clue Sherlock.

playa2 wrote:

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:3 US submarines were in the area (USS Trepang, Albuquerque, and Wyoming) and the USS Teddy Roosevelt?

The Wyoming was out in the area on sea trials at the time, and the CO and XO were BOTH relieved of command very shortly after TWA 800 went down.

Random Murder? Someone on that plane that justifies killing everyone? Put fear into people but tell everyone its was not a terror act but malfunction? Rouge sub?

So it was just a screw up? Incompetence with a subsequent cover up?

You don't have a clue Sherlock.

Ok Dr. Watson, whats your theory? Gov't Sub shoots down a jet and wants to cover it up. Is that it? Thats all?

More "they"?