EnySpree wrote:the truth is if Dalembert played 33 mins per his numbers would be similar to Tysons....better actually if you count his blocks and ability to finish in the paint with something other than a dunk. and a jumpshot
If Camby played 30mins he'd be better than Tyson too
gunsnewing wrote:EnySpree wrote:the truth is if Dalembert played 33 mins per his numbers would be similar to Tysons....better actually if you count his blocks and ability to finish in the paint with something other than a dunk. and a jumpshot
If Camby played 30mins he'd be better than Tyson too
Absolutely...factor in Camby is 92 years old
wouldn't be a bad addition. need big bodies period.
The Knicks need big men desperately but i think the OP is overrating Dalembert just a tad. The Knicks could use him since we have no depth at C but he isnt exactly bigtime bigman
