Knicks · IWG Coefficient--- the only stat you need to know to rank players (page 1)

melo 6.52
bron 7.01
durant 6.84
gallo 4.87
jrswag 4.95
nash 3.99
kobe 6.16

it's clear melo is in bron/durant/kobe super elite level,

look at how bad nash played last year,

kobe is no longer as good as melo,

gallo has the impact of a good role players,

IWG Coefficient gives the heavy weights to the big basics: points, boards, dimes, ft%, ft, 3p, fg%, WINS

less juice behind specialty cats: steasl, blocks

ignores turnovers because including wins total discounts negative categories,

ignores 3p% because included in fg%,

considers games played out of 82--- health,

future considerations:

how it looks applied to playoffs,

how it looks as it happens--- path it takes over season

compare to per,

nash's mvp season he had a 5.69 IWG Coefficient

IronWillGiroud wrote:ok we have a problem,

nash's mvp season he had a 5.69 IWG Coefficient

Oh no, there goes the formula! I know you mentioned all the things you use to compute your coefficient, but can you give us the actual formula?

Dagger wrote:

IronWillGiroud wrote:ok we have a problem,

nash's mvp season he had a 5.69 IWG Coefficient

Oh no, there goes the formula! I know you mentioned all the things you use to compute your coefficient, but can you give us the actual formula?

woah, woah--- what's with the ad hominem? you saying you don't trust the IWG coefficient??

IronWillGiroud wrote:ok we have a problem,

nash's mvp season he had a 5.69 IWG Coefficient

What's the problem, he didn't deserve either MVP.

IronWillGiroud wrote:

Dagger wrote:

IronWillGiroud wrote:ok we have a problem,

nash's mvp season he had a 5.69 IWG Coefficient

Oh no, there goes the formula! I know you mentioned all the things you use to compute your coefficient, but can you give us the actual formula?

woah, woah--- what's with the ad hominem? you saying you don't trust the IWG coefficient??

Ad hominem fallacy?! No way man, you got it all wrong. I have tons of respect for the IWG brand, I was just curious!

EWWWWHHH GROSS.

Killa4luv wrote:

IronWillGiroud wrote:ok we have a problem,

nash's mvp season he had a 5.69 IWG Coefficient

What's the problem, he didn't deserve either MVP.

great point,

i don't know why i didn't look at it like that,

THE IWG COEFFICIENT PROVES THAT NASH WAS NOT DESERVING OF MVP!!

will update with Coefficient vs ESPN ranking