Knicks · Article: Andrea Bargnani becoming the player Amare Stoudemire can't be for the Knicks (page 1)

CrushAlot @ 11/15/2013 10:18 PM
Andrea Bargnani Becoming the Player Amar'e Stoudemire Can't Be for NY Knicks

By Jonathan Wasserman (NBA Lead Writer) on November 15, 2013


Hey, this Andrea Bargnani fella has looked pretty good lately, huh?

I don't want to jinx that hot hand of his, but he's now up to 15 points per game on 51.6 percent shooting and 44 percent from downtown.

And just like that, the Knicks have another scoring weapon to pair alongside Carmelo Anthony.

The guy can make shots. Sure, he looks foolish at times on defense, and his awkward approach to the game makes him an easy target to pick on.

But when the Knicks dealt Steve Novak, Marcus Camby and a future pick, they did so knowing they got the best player in the deal.

And ya' know what? Had the Knicks not made that trade, they would have been in a load of trouble right now with Tyson Chandler going down early. In the four games that Chandler has been out, Bargnani has averaged 21 points on 53 percent shooting.

Considering that the Knicks' halftime T-shirt launcher has gotten more burn than Amar'e Stoudemire, Bargnani's production could be what keeps this team above water.

I hate to do it to STAT, because it's just not his fault, but man—these numbers below are depressing:


2013-14 Games Field Goals Made Turnovers Salary
Amar'e 5 6 9 $21,679,893


I threw salary in there because why not.

The fact that Stoudemire has more turnovers than made baskets tells you all you need to know about where he's at and what he's offering.

When healthy last season, STAT was actually productive for the Knicks. In 29 games, he averaged 14 points on 57 percent shooting. And now he's not.

Instead, it's Bargnani who has emerged as a second or third option for New York. And it's a good thing, because there just aren't many other reliable scoring weapons to call on.

With him at the 5 and Anthony at the 4, these guys actually play off each other nicely, too.

Bargnani's strength isn't shot-creating—it's shot-making. He's essentially in scoring position whenever he catches the ball, given his range and size that allows him to fire over the defense.

Though it's an argument for another time, the Bargnani-Anthony tandem actually works quite well when Chandler isn't on the floor. With opposing centers guarding Bargnani, very few are comfortable defending him out on the perimeter.

And if the defense switches on the pick-and-pop, he's able to just shoot it right over the top.

Nobody ever doubted Bargnani's scoring capabilities. He averaged 21 per game a few years ago. The challenge has been integrating him into the offense and figuring out how to maximize his strengths as an inside-outside 7-footer.

Consistency will really be the key with Bargnani. Can he knock down these mid-range jumpers and three-balls on a regular basis? The Knicks can't afford a frontcourt version of J.R. Smith, who can erupt one night and implode the next.

Assuming that Stoudemire's days of 20-point games and highlight throwdowns are over, the Knicks will need Bargnani to replace him as an everyday scoring threat.

He's not an ideal second option for a team with championship aspirations, but he'll do for now. The Knicks just don't have anywhere else to look.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/18524...

Knicksfan @ 11/15/2013 11:57 PM
So ironic that the maligned Bargnani is one of the few bright stories of the season, while previous fan favorites J.R., Stat and Felton are stirring up controversy, talk of retirement and trade scenarios, respectively.
newyorknewyork @ 11/16/2013 7:02 AM
Our frontcourt production as a whole is terrible.
smackeddog @ 11/16/2013 10:59 AM
Amar'e has looked awful, but he's been playing about 5 mins every other game, and a total of 49mins this season. Do people really think it's fair to judge him after 49 mins? Give him a month or two.
CrushAlot @ 11/16/2013 11:09 AM
smackeddog wrote:Amar'e has looked awful, but he's been playing about 5 mins every other game, and a total of 49mins this season. Do people really think it's fair to judge him after 49 mins? Give him a month or two.
I don't know. There is rusty and out of rhythm and there is slow and looking like you have lost a lot of your athleticism. Amare has looked like he is experiencing both. Also, can Amare hold up to play more than he is playing? Maybe the Knicks just need to play him 20 mins a night and see what happens. Woodson is supposed to be meeting with him today to discuss the best way Amare can be effective. Whatever happens the ten minute every other night turnover festival is getting old.
smackeddog @ 11/16/2013 11:29 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Amar'e has looked awful, but he's been playing about 5 mins every other game, and a total of 49mins this season. Do people really think it's fair to judge him after 49 mins? Give him a month or two.
I don't know. There is rusty and out of rhythm and there is slow and looking like you have lost a lot of your athleticism. Amare has looked like he is experiencing both. Also, can Amare hold up to play more than he is playing? Maybe the Knicks just need to play him 20 mins a night and see what happens. Woodson is supposed to be meeting with him today to discuss the best way Amare can be effective. Whatever happens the ten minute every other night turnover festival is getting old.

He looks slow and unathletic because he has piled on the pounds. Who the heck thought it would be a great idea to have him bulk up?! We saw how that was to the detriment of his game in the lockout season. Now they decide to do it again excpet his knees are even weaker!

CrushAlot @ 11/16/2013 11:34 AM
smackeddog wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Amar'e has looked awful, but he's been playing about 5 mins every other game, and a total of 49mins this season. Do people really think it's fair to judge him after 49 mins? Give him a month or two.
I don't know. There is rusty and out of rhythm and there is slow and looking like you have lost a lot of your athleticism. Amare has looked like he is experiencing both. Also, can Amare hold up to play more than he is playing? Maybe the Knicks just need to play him 20 mins a night and see what happens. Woodson is supposed to be meeting with him today to discuss the best way Amare can be effective. Whatever happens the ten minute every other night turnover festival is getting old.

He looks slow and unathletic because he has piled on the pounds. Who the heck thought it would be a great idea to have him bulk up?! We saw how that was to the detriment of his game in the lockout season. Now they decide to do it again excpet his knees are even weaker!

Did the Knicks/Amare want to gain weight or is it a result of not being able to work out. Thought Amare was vegan.
H1AND1 @ 11/16/2013 11:35 AM
smackeddog wrote:Amar'e has looked awful, but he's been playing about 5 mins every other game, and a total of 49mins this season. Do people really think it's fair to judge him after 49 mins? Give him a month or two.

Unfortunately, yes, I think you can judge him. Someone who can only play 5 min. every other game is pretty much done. It sucks because I always like Stat but it's time for him to hang it up.

Page 1 of 1