H1AND1 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:H1AND1 wrote:Here we go again, lol. Isn't he from North Jersey, too? So you guys think they'll take Felton/Shump/JR (+Chris) and a 2nd rounder for Kyrie?!?!?
If we ask nicely, I see no reason why not.
Better yet, Dolan for Kyrie 
I almost got excited before realizing that it couldn't happen, lol.
CrushAlot wrote:playa2 wrote:CrushAlot wrote:playa2 wrote:Chad Ford says: Yeah, I see Twitter is blowing up about what I wrote about Kyrie. Thought that was fairly common knowledge that he's been unhappy there. Maybe not ... Don't overreact. Much, much harder for players in their rookie contracts to leave. They have to take a much riskier path and essential sign a qualifying offer as a restricted free agent. Very few do it. And the Cavs are working to try to create a winning situation and culture to make him happy. Didn't report it to say he's gone. Just trying to show why the Cavs are trying hard to right the ship right now.
Knicks need to get Waiters and help the CAvs create a 'winning situation' for Kyrie.
Crushalot, do you think Waiters and Melo would get along?
I know they both starred at Da Cuse, but both are use to having the green light offensively.
I remember Waiters telling the league, he's coming up, and gonna be the best shooting guard in the association one day.
I think they would but I also think if you get Waiters you move him or hardaway jr in a deal for a point guard. Waiters is really good. He also is supremely confident. If you can get a talent like Waiters at a discount I think you have to try.
He reminds me of a Flip Murry or a Marcus Thorton. I'm not that enthralled with his talent even though I think he's better than anything we've got. I suspect that we could just sign Waiters outright when he becomes a free agent after his rookie contact expires.
I hope the OP was just being sarcastic. I would love Irving but it aint happening
NardDogNation wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:I hope the OP was just being sarcastic. I would love Irving but it aint happening
Why not?
Because Irving is a hell of a player and we dont have many assets
StarksEwing1 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:I hope the OP was just being sarcastic. I would love Irving but it aint happening
Why not?
Because Irving is a hell of a player and we dont have many assets
We could always sign him in 2016.
NardDogNation wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:I hope the OP was just being sarcastic. I would love Irving but it aint happening
Why not?
Because Irving is a hell of a player and we dont have many assets
We could always sign him in 2016.
True but we dont know how teh cap situation will be like
