Off Topic · This is the Authentic Documentation of Crime of the Century.Covers A-Z (page 1)

INTRODUCTION
0.01:02 - 12 parallels between Pearl Harbor and September 11
0.14:10 - The debate: main issues

PART 1 - AIR DEFENSE
0.14:55 - Where are the interceptors?
0.16:12 - The "incompetence theory" (radars, transponders)
0.22:00 - The military drills
0.29:40 - Specific warnings
0.33:08 - The chain of command
0.38:10 - Promotions, not punishments
0.39:50 - The Mineta case
0.47:38 - Debunkers: "Mineta was mistaken"
0.53:18 - The Mineta case - A summary

PART 2 - THE HIJACKERS
0.57:15 - "Piss-poor student pilots"
0.59:38 - Marwan al-Sheikki (UA175)
1.01:52 - Ziad Jarrah (UA93)
1.03:06 - Hani Hanjour (AA77)
1.04:00 - The debunkers' positions
1.06:00 - 2 simulations of the Pentagon attack
1.13:10 - Someone knew?
1.16:40 - Airport security cameras
1.20.15 - The missing black boxes

PART 3 - THE AIRPLANES
1.26:50 - Passenger planes or military drones?
1.28:20 - Impossible speeds
1.37:30 - What happened to the passengers?
1.38:35 - The cellphone calls
1.48:30 - The debunkers' position
1.50:38 - If not from the planes, from where?

PART 4 - THE PENTAGON
0.02:35 - Downed light poles
0.03:30 - The missing plane
0.04:30 - The official version
0.05:24 - Problems with the official version (wing, ailerons, tail, engines)
0.13:09 - The mystery hole
0.14:10 - The debunkers' explanations
0.16:20 - Conclusions on damage analysis
0.17:00 - The missing tapes
0.18:30 - Security video analysis
0.23.40 - Pentagon summary

PART 5 - FLIGHT 93
0.24.15 - The empty hole
0.28.00 - The debunkers' explanations
0.33:00 - Plane crash or bomb explosion?
0.34:50 - The debris field
0.37.20 - The shootdown hypothesis
0.38:50 - The small white plane
0.41:40 - "Let's roll"
0.44:25 - Summary of Flight 93

PART 6 - THE TWIN TOWERS
0.45:10 - Introduction
0.47:45 - The Towers' small dirty secret
0.53:10 - Larry Silverstein
0.56:15 - NIST vs. Architects & Engineers
0.58:00 - Robust or fragile buildings?
1.04:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #1
1.05:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #2
1.07:35 - Problems with the official explanation
1.18:00 - The full collapse - No official explanation
1.18:50 - Law of physics violated
1.20:50 - The Twin Towers and freefall
1.27:50 - Debunkers' response to A&E

PART 6 - THE TWIN TOWERS (continued)
0.00:20 - The hypothesis of controlled demolitions
0.01:08 - Debunkers: "Impossible to place explosives"
0.07:34 - Explosions in the Twin Towers (witnesses)
0.15:00 - "Fuel in elevators shafts" theory
0.23:25 - Debunkers: "Explosions not recorded by tv cameras"
0.30:26 - Squibs
0.33:00 - Explosive force (montage)
0.35:00 - Ejecta
0.38:00 - Diagonal cuts
0.40:15 - What happened to the hat trusses?
0.42:20 - Extreme temperatures
0.45:30 - Debunkers' explanations
0.46:45 - Twisted and mangled beams
0.47:40 - Molten steel
0.51:05 - Molten concrete
0.53:50 - Pulverization
0.57:40 - Victims vaporized
1.02:20 - Conclusion on the Twin Towers

PART 7 - BUILDING 7
1.05:10 - Introduction
1.06:35 - Official version by NIST
1.09:36 - Collapse computer simulation
1.11:00 - Fire computer simulation
1.12:20 - Debunkers: "Building 7 weaker"
1.14:25 - Preknowledge
1.19:00 - Symmetry
1.20:00 - Freefall

EPILOGUE
1.22:30 - John McCain
1.24:35 - The last word

Even air traffic controllers figured out only military planes could have made those turns at that speed.

I have to believe they were remote controlled military planes that was purposely flown into the twin towers by our own Shadow government and then the buildings imploded by a demolition team who had pre-wired the buildings at an earlier time. The weekend before all the power was shut down & security cameras were out and many workers were going in and out of the building to supposedly do electrical work.

The lady at the end of the 1st video calling her husband from the alleged hijacked plane said It's A Frame" with her last words.

Many are afraid of the truth, that's your problem, i'm not afraid to bring you the truth I love my country!!!

Many didn't even know it was all a sham, and lives were being snuffed out in the process.

Innocent people were murdered, but not by some guys in the middle east living in caves.

Well this guy Massimo Mazzucco wrote and directed these clips so he put it all together for you !

Watch it in increments 20 min at a time etc.. to see if it is so.

playa2 wrote:Ok tell me watcha think, who saw the video ?

You watched the video, but you don't have enough guts to tell what you thought ? WOW

Percy Greaves was credible. Give it a read.

BTW, the rich and powerful have been manipulating for centuries. In the form of religion or by Kings, Mullahs, Sheiks, Lords, Prime Ministers, Presidents, Pope's and Dictators.

Buy shares of Exxon and join the party.

No I have not watched the video. Most never get into motives. Just same old rants about "THEM".

I waste enough time on the knicks.

I love the part about how they have no pictures of the alleged hijackers waiting in line to board the plane, or sitting waiting for their flights , or getting something to eat in the airport. Cameras are everywhere in the airport? Then they show Mohammad
Atta going thru a check point BUT THE TIME STAMPS WERE REMOVED.

175 Views must be interesting to many, but very few choose to think out the points made in the clips.

Nope, your count is off.
Hit refresh, I think it will boast your count, and your self esteem.

Others might be watching, but they got you on ignore.

Im all you got.

playa2 wrote:

INTRODUCTION
0.01:02 - 12 parallels between Pearl Harbor and September 11
0.14:10 - The debate: main issues

PART 1 - AIR DEFENSE
0.14:55 - Where are the interceptors?
0.16:12 - The "incompetence theory" (radars, transponders)
0.22:00 - The military drills
0.29:40 - Specific warnings
0.33:08 - The chain of command
0.38:10 - Promotions, not punishments
0.39:50 - The Mineta case
0.47:38 - Debunkers: "Mineta was mistaken"
0.53:18 - The Mineta case - A summary

PART 2 - THE HIJACKERS
0.57:15 - "Piss-poor student pilots"
0.59:38 - Marwan al-Sheikki (UA175)
1.01:52 - Ziad Jarrah (UA93)
1.03:06 - Hani Hanjour (AA77)
1.04:00 - The debunkers' positions
1.06:00 - 2 simulations of the Pentagon attack
1.13:10 - Someone knew?
1.16:40 - Airport security cameras
1.20.15 - The missing black boxes

PART 3 - THE AIRPLANES
1.26:50 - Passenger planes or military drones?
1.28:20 - Impossible speeds
1.37:30 - What happened to the passengers?
1.38:35 - The cellphone calls
1.48:30 - The debunkers' position
1.50:38 - If not from the planes, from where?

PART 4 - THE PENTAGON
0.02:35 - Downed light poles
0.03:30 - The missing plane
0.04:30 - The official version
0.05:24 - Problems with the official version (wing, ailerons, tail, engines)
0.13:09 - The mystery hole
0.14:10 - The debunkers' explanations
0.16:20 - Conclusions on damage analysis
0.17:00 - The missing tapes
0.18:30 - Security video analysis
0.23.40 - Pentagon summary

PART 5 - FLIGHT 93
0.24.15 - The empty hole
0.28.00 - The debunkers' explanations
0.33:00 - Plane crash or bomb explosion?
0.34:50 - The debris field
0.37.20 - The shootdown hypothesis
0.38:50 - The small white plane
0.41:40 - "Let's roll"
0.44:25 - Summary of Flight 93

PART 6 - THE TWIN TOWERS
0.45:10 - Introduction
0.47:45 - The Towers' small dirty secret
0.53:10 - Larry Silverstein
0.56:15 - NIST vs. Architects & Engineers
0.58:00 - Robust or fragile buildings?
1.04:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #1
1.05:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #2
1.07:35 - Problems with the official explanation
1.18:00 - The full collapse - No official explanation
1.18:50 - Law of physics violated
1.20:50 - The Twin Towers and freefall
1.27:50 - Debunkers' response to A&E

PART 6 - THE TWIN TOWERS (continued)
0.00:20 - The hypothesis of controlled demolitions
0.01:08 - Debunkers: "Impossible to place explosives"
0.07:34 - Explosions in the Twin Towers (witnesses)
0.15:00 - "Fuel in elevators shafts" theory
0.23:25 - Debunkers: "Explosions not recorded by tv cameras"
0.30:26 - Squibs
0.33:00 - Explosive force (montage)
0.35:00 - Ejecta
0.38:00 - Diagonal cuts
0.40:15 - What happened to the hat trusses?
0.42:20 - Extreme temperatures
0.45:30 - Debunkers' explanations
0.46:45 - Twisted and mangled beams
0.47:40 - Molten steel
0.51:05 - Molten concrete
0.53:50 - Pulverization
0.57:40 - Victims vaporized
1.02:20 - Conclusion on the Twin Towers

PART 7 - BUILDING 7
1.05:10 - Introduction
1.06:35 - Official version by NIST
1.09:36 - Collapse computer simulation
1.11:00 - Fire computer simulation
1.12:20 - Debunkers: "Building 7 weaker"
1.14:25 - Preknowledge
1.19:00 - Symmetry
1.20:00 - Freefall

EPILOGUE
1.22:30 - John McCain
1.24:35 - The last word

The tapes were missing from the pentagon and surrounding buildings because of a missle inflicting damage on the pentagon.

John McCain last words of dumbfoolery pretty much sums up the cover up.

Nalod wrote:I view the posts to peak your loony tunes. not the video.

Others might be watching, but they got you on ignore.

Im all you got.

Not true Uncle Nalod, he's got me too. I tune in occassionaly to see you two go at it. (Review the threads, you'll see I'm not delusional)
playa, just a note; reposting your own OP is truly bad form and screams insecurity. Your weird comments every few days are more than enough.

Hang in there, somebody else is bound to say something more snarky and set you off.

jrodmc wrote:

Nalod wrote:I view the posts to peak your loony tunes. not the video.

Others might be watching, but they got you on ignore.

Im all you got.

Not true Uncle Nalod, he's got me too. I tune in occassionaly to see you two go at it. (Review the threads, you'll see I'm not delusional)
playa, just a note; reposting your own OP is truly bad form and screams insecurity. Your weird comments every few days are more than enough.

Hang in there, somebody else is bound to say something more snarky and set you off.

Playa is the guy on the street ranting and raving. Somtimes you stop to hear it.

Playa thinks he is liberating america and waking it up by resposting this stuff. Most people jsut want a better data plan for its cellphone. The drone is outside my office now on the 20th floor. Gotta run!

When a documentary is debunking the Debunkers its not worth the view.

Nalod wrote:

jrodmc wrote:

Nalod wrote:I view the posts to peak your loony tunes. not the video.

Others might be watching, but they got you on ignore.

Im all you got.

Not true Uncle Nalod, he's got me too. I tune in occassionaly to see you two go at it. (Review the threads, you'll see I'm not delusional)
playa, just a note; reposting your own OP is truly bad form and screams insecurity. Your weird comments every few days are more than enough.

Hang in there, somebody else is bound to say something more snarky and set you off.

Playa is the guy on the street ranting and raving. Somtimes you stop to hear it.

Playa thinks he is liberating america and waking it up by resposting this stuff. Most people jsut want a better data plan for its cellphone. The drone is outside my office now on the 20th floor. Gotta run!

When a documentary is debunking the Debunkers its not worth the view.

Thankfully, work blocks almost all of playa's links, so as he surely will say, the Dark Side is continuing to win in my world!
And I don't have a data plan. Or cable. Or DirectTV. So I plan on completely missing the next crime of the century when it's televised by the Illumati's minions.

In other psuedo-related news, I heard a guy on NPR (FM Radio, heh heh, I don't even have Sirius heh heh) quoting from his FOURTH volume on LBJ. Incredible. 50 years and 5 Seinfeld episodes later and the grassy knoll is still relevant!

Im not sure 911 isn't the same.

Does my government kill a few for the greater good? If 9-11 was used to promote greater powers and emotional enhancement to motivate which prevents a far greater tragedy can it be justified?

I have studied most of our wars and get the underlying reasons. They are not illuminati new order crap with Marvel comic evil men with "rule the world agendas", they are ecnomonic events as are most wars. Its how shyt got done. Most of it very sad.

Playa, I think you'd do well to read a few books and draw your own bias not from the same "New order" agenda but from scholarly type authors who have real credentials from real schools. If you wish to be taken seriously you should elevate your thinking.

Nalod wrote:
Here is the thing, not everybody cares who killed Kennedy, but they care that he was killed.

Im not sure 911 isn't the same.

Does my government kill a few for the greater good? If 9-11 was used to promote greater powers and emotional enhancement to motivate which prevents a far greater tragedy can it be justified?

I have studied most of our wars and get the underlying reasons. They are not illuminati new order crap with Marvel comic evil men with "rule the world agendas", they are ecnomonic events as are most wars. Its how shyt got done. Most of it very sad.

Playa, I think you'd do well to read a few books and draw your own bias not from the same "New order" agenda but from scholarly type authors who have real credentials from real schools. If you wish to be taken seriously you should elevate your thinking.

You should elevate yours too

IronWillGiroud wrote:

Nalod wrote:
Here is the thing, not everybody cares who killed Kennedy, but they care that he was killed.

Im not sure 911 isn't the same.

Does my government kill a few for the greater good? If 9-11 was used to promote greater powers and emotional enhancement to motivate which prevents a far greater tragedy can it be justified?

I have studied most of our wars and get the underlying reasons. They are not illuminati new order crap with Marvel comic evil men with "rule the world agendas", they are ecnomonic events as are most wars. Its how shyt got done. Most of it very sad.

Playa, I think you'd do well to read a few books and draw your own bias not from the same "New order" agenda but from scholarly type authors who have real credentials from real schools. If you wish to be taken seriously you should elevate your thinking.

You should elevate yours too

Everyone should.......

playa2 wrote:

playa2 wrote:

INTRODUCTION
0.01:02 - 12 parallels between Pearl Harbor and September 11
0.14:10 - The debate: main issues

PART 1 - AIR DEFENSE
0.14:55 - Where are the interceptors?
0.16:12 - The "incompetence theory" (radars, transponders)
0.22:00 - The military drills
0.29:40 - Specific warnings
0.33:08 - The chain of command
0.38:10 - Promotions, not punishments
0.39:50 - The Mineta case
0.47:38 - Debunkers: "Mineta was mistaken"
0.53:18 - The Mineta case - A summary

PART 2 - THE HIJACKERS
0.57:15 - "Piss-poor student pilots"
0.59:38 - Marwan al-Sheikki (UA175)
1.01:52 - Ziad Jarrah (UA93)
1.03:06 - Hani Hanjour (AA77)
1.04:00 - The debunkers' positions
1.06:00 - 2 simulations of the Pentagon attack
1.13:10 - Someone knew?
1.16:40 - Airport security cameras
1.20.15 - The missing black boxes

PART 3 - THE AIRPLANES
1.26:50 - Passenger planes or military drones?
1.28:20 - Impossible speeds
1.37:30 - What happened to the passengers?
1.38:35 - The cellphone calls
1.48:30 - The debunkers' position
1.50:38 - If not from the planes, from where?

PART 4 - THE PENTAGON
0.02:35 - Downed light poles
0.03:30 - The missing plane
0.04:30 - The official version
0.05:24 - Problems with the official version (wing, ailerons, tail, engines)
0.13:09 - The mystery hole
0.14:10 - The debunkers' explanations
0.16:20 - Conclusions on damage analysis
0.17:00 - The missing tapes
0.18:30 - Security video analysis
0.23.40 - Pentagon summary

PART 5 - FLIGHT 93
0.24.15 - The empty hole
0.28.00 - The debunkers' explanations
0.33:00 - Plane crash or bomb explosion?
0.34:50 - The debris field
0.37.20 - The shootdown hypothesis
0.38:50 - The small white plane
0.41:40 - "Let's roll"
0.44:25 - Summary of Flight 93

PART 6 - THE TWIN TOWERS
0.45:10 - Introduction
0.47:45 - The Towers' small dirty secret
0.53:10 - Larry Silverstein
0.56:15 - NIST vs. Architects & Engineers
0.58:00 - Robust or fragile buildings?
1.04:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #1
1.05:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #2
1.07:35 - Problems with the official explanation
1.18:00 - The full collapse - No official explanation
1.18:50 - Law of physics violated
1.20:50 - The Twin Towers and freefall
1.27:50 - Debunkers' response to A&E

PART 6 - THE TWIN TOWERS (continued)
0.00:20 - The hypothesis of controlled demolitions
0.01:08 - Debunkers: "Impossible to place explosives"
0.07:34 - Explosions in the Twin Towers (witnesses)
0.15:00 - "Fuel in elevators shafts" theory
0.23:25 - Debunkers: "Explosions not recorded by tv cameras"
0.30:26 - Squibs
0.33:00 - Explosive force (montage)
0.35:00 - Ejecta
0.38:00 - Diagonal cuts
0.40:15 - What happened to the hat trusses?
0.42:20 - Extreme temperatures
0.45:30 - Debunkers' explanations
0.46:45 - Twisted and mangled beams
0.47:40 - Molten steel
0.51:05 - Molten concrete
0.53:50 - Pulverization
0.57:40 - Victims vaporized
1.02:20 - Conclusion on the Twin Towers

PART 7 - BUILDING 7
1.05:10 - Introduction
1.06:35 - Official version by NIST
1.09:36 - Collapse computer simulation
1.11:00 - Fire computer simulation
1.12:20 - Debunkers: "Building 7 weaker"
1.14:25 - Preknowledge
1.19:00 - Symmetry
1.20:00 - Freefall

EPILOGUE
1.22:30 - John McCain
1.24:35 - The last word

The tapes were missing from the pentagon and surrounding buildings because of a missle inflicting damage on the pentagon.

John McCain last words of dumbfoolery pretty much sums up the cover up.

These military and government officials lied and deceived the American public bu=y killing Americans in cold blood. Modern Technology was used against our own American citizens and folled many into making excuses, but those who believe just keep watching and reading you will begin to connect the dots. All the others are afraid of the truth or they have benefited from it in some round about way.

The lack of video in the airport of the so called Hijackers is a sign that they weren't on those military planes that intercepted the original planes and the real passengers were murdered at some remote airport.

Check out 1hr.37:30 pt 3 - What happened to the passengers?