Sarcasm is fun....
any old guys feel free to entertain us with your knowledge
In my desk at work I have a Walt Frazier card.
In a Cav's uniform!
Why? Remind myself that if Clyde can be replaced, anyone can be replaced!
From what I remember, Clyde was starting to break down and they had to trade either Pearl or Clyde. Cleamons never panned out so it was a bad trade. I think Clyde played two more years and that was it.
That Shyt was just not right. I don't know the contract stipulations. Maybe Clyde wanted more money?
I sometimes jokingly wonder if we are cursed because of the trade. I tried to give the notion momentum on another board but it never caught on. Legend has it though that the curse won't be broken until Clyde gets to play one more game, his last game, in a Knick jersey. Then and only then will the curse be lifted and we win a championship.
Curse's are on the court. WE have a history of stupidity in the off season.
first off i hope this query is not meant to compare carmelo anthony to walt frazier.
second it is clear that the knicks were cursed the moment they traded for carmelo anthony.
dk7th wrote:first off i hope this query is not meant to compare carmelo anthony to walt frazier.second it is clear that the knicks were cursed the moment they traded for carmelo anthony.
How you gonna say don't compare Frazier to melo then compare walt Frazier to melo....
And yes this is my dig at the Constant Melo trade posts.
Hail Hydra
^how dare you with the Ewing and Clyde pictures
DrAlphaeus wrote:
That's awesome!!!
STARBURY SO WINS ON EVERYBODY HERE THAT HATED ON HIM!!!!!!!!!!!
STARBURY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
EnySpree wrote:dk7th wrote:first off i hope this query is not meant to compare carmelo anthony to walt frazier.second it is clear that the knicks were cursed the moment they traded for carmelo anthony.
How you gonna say don't compare Frazier to melo then compare walt Frazier to melo....
Because if you've read any of dk7th at all, you'd notice his posts have nothing to do with basketball, just Melo hate.
Next up: hate will now explain to you logically how 30 years without a chip is actually less than 4 years without a chip.
