Knicks · Tyson Chandler another 20-20 game (page 1)
I think the Knicks acted fairly based on what they saw last year. Maybe with a contract year we get that kind of effort, maybe we dont. Who knows. He dogged his way off the team and now he's playing like it had nothing to do him. Kinda makes me hate Tyson if anything 
fishmike wrote:"with that type of play" is the key. Tyson didnt want to be here and he played that way. He's clearly invigorated in Dal.I think the Knicks acted fairly based on what they saw last year. Maybe with a contract year we get that kind of effort, maybe we dont. Who knows. He dogged his way off the team and now he's playing like it had nothing to do him. Kinda makes me hate Tyson if anything
Many players come here and their value goes down and subsequently back when they are traded. We have a cranky dumb owner and the guys making the calls behind him were not good enough. One thing I dont get--we spend so much money--why not spend the 12mm per year on a Sam Presti? Phil Jackson is 68 and does the job part time.
BRIGGS wrote:fishmike wrote:"with that type of play" is the key. Tyson didnt want to be here and he played that way. He's clearly invigorated in Dal.I think the Knicks acted fairly based on what they saw last year. Maybe with a contract year we get that kind of effort, maybe we dont. Who knows. He dogged his way off the team and now he's playing like it had nothing to do him. Kinda makes me hate Tyson if anything
Many players come here and their value goes down and subsequently back when they are traded. We have a cranky dumb owner and the guys making the calls behind him were not good enough. One thing I dont get--we spend so much money--why not spend the 12mm per year on a Sam Presti? Phil Jackson is 68 and does the job part time.
Sam wins in SAS, gets paid nice, had a great owner and a coach.
Why work for a phuch face like Dolan?
Phil is part time?
BRIGGS wrote:its just high turnover. Equal number of guys come here and just wilt. Im defending MSG by any stretch, we have never had more than an 18 month plan in place here.fishmike wrote:"with that type of play" is the key. Tyson didnt want to be here and he played that way. He's clearly invigorated in Dal.I think the Knicks acted fairly based on what they saw last year. Maybe with a contract year we get that kind of effort, maybe we dont. Who knows. He dogged his way off the team and now he's playing like it had nothing to do him. Kinda makes me hate Tyson if anything
Many players come here and their value goes down and subsequently back when they are traded. We have a cranky dumb owner and the guys making the calls behind him were not good enough. One thing I dont get--we spend so much money--why not spend the 12mm per year on a Sam Presti? Phil Jackson is 68 and does the job part time.
fishmike wrote:"with that type of play" is the key. Tyson didnt want to be here and he played that way. He's clearly invigorated in Dal.I think the Knicks acted fairly based on what they saw last year. Maybe with a contract year we get that kind of effort, maybe we dont. Who knows. He dogged his way off the team and now he's playing like it had nothing to do him. Kinda makes me hate Tyson if anything
Also I dont think you can be in the business of trading players who might be a little upset playing in NY. The guy was making 11mm and he took the contract to come here. he played very well in season 1. Whatever happened--where Tyson lost value--thats up in the air. But the decision makers took MUCH less and took on salary to get rid of him. When you start saying who is the best C right now in the NBA Tyson is in the top 5.
BRIGGS wrote:fishmike wrote:"with that type of play" is the key. Tyson didnt want to be here and he played that way. He's clearly invigorated in Dal.I think the Knicks acted fairly based on what they saw last year. Maybe with a contract year we get that kind of effort, maybe we dont. Who knows. He dogged his way off the team and now he's playing like it had nothing to do him. Kinda makes me hate Tyson if anything
Also I dont think you can be in the business of trading players who might be a little upset playing in NY. The guy was making 11mm and he took the contract to come here. he played very well in season 1. Whatever happened--where Tyson lost value--thats up in the air. But the decision makers took MUCH less and took on salary to get rid of him. When you start saying who is the best C right now in the NBA Tyson is in the top 5.
Prior to trade this is what he was making on our Bank Roll
2011-12 New York Knicks NBA $13,107,837
2012-13 New York Knicks NBA $13,604,188
2013-14 New York Knicks NBA $14,100,538
Nalod wrote:BRIGGS wrote:fishmike wrote:"with that type of play" is the key. Tyson didnt want to be here and he played that way. He's clearly invigorated in Dal.I think the Knicks acted fairly based on what they saw last year. Maybe with a contract year we get that kind of effort, maybe we dont. Who knows. He dogged his way off the team and now he's playing like it had nothing to do him. Kinda makes me hate Tyson if anything
Many players come here and their value goes down and subsequently back when they are traded. We have a cranky dumb owner and the guys making the calls behind him were not good enough. One thing I dont get--we spend so much money--why not spend the 12mm per year on a Sam Presti? Phil Jackson is 68 and does the job part time.
Sam wins in SAS, gets paid nice, had a great owner and a coach.
Why work for a phuch face like Dolan?Phil is part time?
You mean Rick Buford. Sam Presti is with OKC. I agree they must love their jobs and would not come here