mreinman wrote:CrushAlot wrote:mreinman wrote:Melo ... 45 minuteslegs were def gone
Yeah. I thought his limp was more pronounced by the end of the game.
not looking good that we are locked for 5 years
and I really did not like the way he finished
6 points on 8 shots, 0 ft's and 0 assists.
mreinman wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Okafor=Demarcus Cousins without the charachter issues.
really?
thats a bold statement
and cousins is a dominating rebounder
How did Daly do overall for those that watched a lot..11 points and 4 blks that aint bad
TPercy wrote:How did Daly do overall for those that watched a lot..11 points and 4 blks that aint bad
he was ok ...
after cole fouled out we were toast
TPercy wrote:How did Daly do overall for those that watched a lot..11 points and 4 blks that aint bad
I thought he looked good. Cousins is a bulky and he played him tough.
mreinman wrote:mreinman wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Okafor=Demarcus Cousins without the charachter issues.
really?
thats a bold statement
and cousins is a dominating rebounder
Cousins is so talented but I just can't stand his demeanor and hot headedness. If we can land Okafor I'd be pretty happy.
mreinman wrote:F500ONE wrote:Splat wrote:F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by LarkBut he's hustling nevertheless
You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time
If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played
Actually I've given credit to 2 players
Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy
But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact
On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team
I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough
To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late
who cares how sac's back court did?
they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.
wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?
Because you have to play both sides of the ball
When players go off for career nights
You can't leverage the other side too much over the other
And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the
"We should have picked up his option"
F500ONE wrote:mreinman wrote:F500ONE wrote:Splat wrote:F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by LarkBut he's hustling nevertheless
You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time
If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played
Actually I've given credit to 2 players
Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy
But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact
On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team
I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough
To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late
who cares how sac's back court did?
they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.
wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?
Because you have to play both sides of the ball
When players go off for career nights
You can't leverage the other side too much over the other
And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the
"We should have picked up his option"
did I mention option? I am not a GM and don't claim to be one.
Larkin did not play both sides of the ball? Did you watch the game on the radio?
F500ONE wrote:mreinman wrote:F500ONE wrote:Splat wrote:F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by LarkBut he's hustling nevertheless
You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time
If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played
Actually I've given credit to 2 players
Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy
But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact
On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team
I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough
To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late
who cares how sac's back court did?
they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.
wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?
Because you have to play both sides of the ball
When players go off for career nights
You can't leverage the other side too much over the other
And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the
"We should have picked up his option"
I have been down on Larkin but he looked great tonight. Wally raving about him right now.
CrushAlot wrote:F500ONE wrote:mreinman wrote:F500ONE wrote:Splat wrote:F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by LarkBut he's hustling nevertheless
You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time
If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played
Actually I've given credit to 2 players
Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy
But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact
On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team
I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough
To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late
who cares how sac's back court did?
they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.
wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?
Because you have to play both sides of the ball
When players go off for career nights
You can't leverage the other side too much over the other
And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the
"We should have picked up his option"
I have been down on Larkin but he looked great tonight. Wally raving about him right now.
don't bother ...
its like talking to a wall
Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.
TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.
right.
then shump got the timely injury.
sad
CrushAlot wrote:F500ONE wrote:mreinman wrote:F500ONE wrote:Splat wrote:F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by LarkBut he's hustling nevertheless
You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time
If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played
Actually I've given credit to 2 players
Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy
But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact
On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team
I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough
To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late
who cares how sac's back court did?
they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.
wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?
Because you have to play both sides of the ball
When players go off for career nights
You can't leverage the other side too much over the other
And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the
"We should have picked up his option"
I have been down on Larkin but he looked great tonight. Wally raving about him right now.
Of course he's being slobbed over
But
Collison had
29/10/1/2 only missed 1 shot
McCallum 10/4/2 shot high%
Stauskus 11/2/1/1 shot high%
Larkin had second half impact more mid 3rd mid 4th qrt impact
He wasn't good in the first half
Overall better game tonight from his previous outings
I just won't oversell tonight's performance
F500ONE wrote:CrushAlot wrote:F500ONE wrote:mreinman wrote:F500ONE wrote:Splat wrote:F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by LarkBut he's hustling nevertheless
You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time
If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played
Actually I've given credit to 2 players
Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy
But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact
On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team
I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough
To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late
who cares how sac's back court did?
they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.
wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?
Because you have to play both sides of the ball
When players go off for career nights
You can't leverage the other side too much over the other
And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the
"We should have picked up his option"
I have been down on Larkin but he looked great tonight. Wally raving about him right now.
Of course he's being slobbed over
But
Collison had
29/10/1/2 only missed 1 shot
McCallum 10/4/2 shot high%
Staukus 11/2/1/1 shot high%
Larkin had second half impact more mid 3rd mid 4th qrt impact
He wasn't good in the first half
In my opinion Larkin looked like he was trying to not make mistakes when he was on the court earlier in tge year. He seems like he is comfortable, taking risks and being opportunistic now. He played very well tonight
mreinman wrote:TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.
right.
then shump got the timely injury.
sad
Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(
TPercy wrote:mreinman wrote:TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.
right.
then shump got the timely injury.
sad
Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(
another phil stinker decision
TPercy wrote:mreinman wrote:TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.
right.
then shump got the timely injury.
sad
Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(
Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.
CrushAlot wrote:TPercy wrote:mreinman wrote:TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.
right.
then shump got the timely injury.
sad
Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(
Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.
None.
which maybe is a sign that the trade was not close.
Looked like Phil did not want any trades.
3 trades that did not happen:
Lowry
Teague
Collison
way to go phil
Fisher is trying to kill Carmelo by playing him the many minutes
