Knicks · Yes There Is A Game Tonight: [Broadway Productions vs Boogie Down Productions] (page 14)

Fisher is trying to kill Carmelo by playing him the many minutes

mreinman wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

TPercy wrote:

mreinman wrote:

TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(

Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.

None.

which maybe is a sign that the trade was not close.

Looked like Phil did not want any trades.

3 trades that did not happen:

Lowry
Teague
Collison

way to go phil

[the following message is to be spoken in the idiot Cali brogue used on this SNL skit)]

buh, buh, wah you mean way ta go Ph-ph-ph-illllllllllllllllll?

I thot u wuz gonna wait and seeeeeeeee

how he duz in da off-seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeson brah

mreinman wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

TPercy wrote:

mreinman wrote:

TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(

Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.

None.

which maybe is a sign that the trade was not close.

Looked like Phil did not want any trades.

3 trades that did not happen:

Lowry
Teague
Collison

way to go phil

I don't think Phil was in charge when those deals were in place if my memmory serves me correct. they were in febuary or whenever the trade deadline was when Steve Mills was in charge

TPercy wrote:

mreinman wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

TPercy wrote:

mreinman wrote:

TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(

Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.

None.

which maybe is a sign that the trade was not close.

Looked like Phil did not want any trades.

3 trades that did not happen:

Lowry
Teague
Collison

way to go phil

I don't think Phil was in charge when those deals were in place if my memmory serves me correct. they were in febuary or whenever the trade deadline was when Steve Mills was in charge

it was widely reported that phil was already pulling the strings

Splat wrote:

mreinman wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

TPercy wrote:

mreinman wrote:

TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(

Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.

None.

which maybe is a sign that the trade was not close.

Looked like Phil did not want any trades.

3 trades that did not happen:

Lowry
Teague
Collison

way to go phil

[the following message is to be spoken in the idiot Cali brogue used on this SNL skit)]

buh, buh, wah you mean way ta go Ph-ph-ph-illllllllllllllllll?

I thot u wuz gonna wait and seeeeeeeee

how he duz in da off-seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeson brah

are you not in the US?

video not avail in the US

mreinman wrote:

Splat wrote:

mreinman wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

TPercy wrote:

mreinman wrote:

TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(

Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.

None.

which maybe is a sign that the trade was not close.

Looked like Phil did not want any trades.

3 trades that did not happen:

Lowry
Teague
Collison

way to go phil

[the following message is to be spoken in the idiot Cali brogue used on this SNL skit)]

buh, buh, wah you mean way ta go Ph-ph-ph-illllllllllllllllll?

I thot u wuz gonna wait and seeeeeeeee

how he duz in da off-seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeson brah

are you not in the US?

video not avail in the US

Knicks1969 wrote:Fisher is trying to kill Carmelo by playing him the many minutes

Melo wants to pad his numbers for the allstar game

mreinman wrote:

CrushAlot wrote:

TPercy wrote:

mreinman wrote:

TPercy wrote:Wish we got darren collison last year when he had the chance, if you guys can recall,it was rumored that (per ESPN)we would do a swap for collison and reggie bullock and they would get shump.

right.

then shump got the timely injury.

sad

Once again Knicks passed up or get unlucky on a great trade deal, I have no clue why we even hesistated on this one, a pretty decent pg( remember we had freaking Felton at the time) and a talented SF :(

Why they played shump in that game made no sense. I think the clips delayed taking off because they were still contemplating the deal after shumps injury.

None.

which maybe is a sign that the trade was not close.

Looked like Phil did not want any trades.

3 trades that did not happen:

Lowry
Teague
Collison

way to go phil

Yup, pretty obvious Phil wanted to assess the players he had, thus no trades. Thus why no trades even now.

Why do people still go on about us not trading Shump for Collinson?! For the last time!!!::

IF WE HAD TRADED FOR COLLINSON, WE WOULD NOT HAVE HAD HIS BIRD RIGHTS (he was on a one year deal with the clips). WE COULD ONLY HAVE OFFERED HIM $3MIL. THE KINGS PAID HIM MORE THAN THAT. THEREFORE WE WOULD HAVE TRADED SHUMP FOR NOTHING- WELL DONE KEYBOARD GM's!!!!!!!

I hope he follows all of your advices in future!

Knicks1969 wrote:Fisher is trying to kill Carmelo by playing him the many minutes

Its like watching what D'Antoni did to Kobe! Kobe's minutes prior to the achilles injury were insane (especially for a player his age), something like 47mins, 48mins, 48mins, 46min, 47mins.

Don't the knicks have a Nice 1 year exception.....why isn't Josh Smith a knick???

smackeddog wrote:

Knicks1969 wrote:Fisher is trying to kill Carmelo by playing him the many minutes

Its like watching what D'Antoni did to Kobe! Kobe's minutes prior to the achilles injury were insane (especially for a player his age), something like 47mins, 48mins, 48mins, 46min, 47mins.

That was all KOBE!!! He wasn't listening to MDA at all at that time so MDA let him do what wanted. That's why you saw no reaction from MDA when it happened. I was watching all the games and it was clear Kobe did what he wanted.

nixluva wrote:

smackeddog wrote:

Knicks1969 wrote:Fisher is trying to kill Carmelo by playing him the many minutes

Its like watching what D'Antoni did to Kobe! Kobe's minutes prior to the achilles injury were insane (especially for a player his age), something like 47mins, 48mins, 48mins, 46min, 47mins.

That was all KOBE!!! He wasn't listening to MDA at all at that time so MDA let him do what wanted. That's why you saw no reaction from MDA when it happened. I was watching all the games and it was clear Kobe did what he wanted.

Yeah because D'Antoni never had a history of running players into the ground

In particular when he knew he was lame duck status

And alienated a presence who could have lessened the burden on Kobe

I watched the Lakers that season and saw quite the contrary

nixluva wrote:

smackeddog wrote:

Knicks1969 wrote:Fisher is trying to kill Carmelo by playing him the many minutes

Its like watching what D'Antoni did to Kobe! Kobe's minutes prior to the achilles injury were insane (especially for a player his age), something like 47mins, 48mins, 48mins, 46min, 47mins.

That was all KOBE!!! He wasn't listening to MDA at all at that time so MDA let him do what wanted. That's why you saw no reaction from MDA when it happened. I was watching all the games and it was clear Kobe did what he wanted.

Well he was hurt and had no business going back in. It was horrible to watch. I believe he got hurt two times and still came back until he tore the Achilles. Kobe definitely is strong willed but D'Antoni needed to sit him that game. I am not a Kobe fan but that was one of the saddest sports events I can remember watching.

F500ONE wrote:

mreinman wrote:

F500ONE wrote:

Splat wrote:

F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by Lark

But he's hustling nevertheless

You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time

If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played

Actually I've given credit to 2 players

Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy

But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact

On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team

I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough

To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late

who cares how sac's back court did?

they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.

wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?

Because you have to play both sides of the ball

When players go off for career nights

You can't leverage the other side too much over the other

And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the

"We should have picked up his option"

From Keith Schlosser:

"Shane Larkin arguably had one of the best games of his young career, tallying 14 points and a career-high 4 steals. In addition to serving as a pesky defender throughout, the guard went about his offensive game in an intelligent matter. He attacked the basket, and converted on all six of his free throws."

mreinman wrote:

F500ONE wrote:

mreinman wrote:

F500ONE wrote:

Splat wrote:

F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by Lark

But he's hustling nevertheless

You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time

If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played

Actually I've given credit to 2 players

Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy

But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact

On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team

I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough

To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late

who cares how sac's back court did?

they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.

wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?

Because you have to play both sides of the ball

When players go off for career nights

You can't leverage the other side too much over the other

And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the

"We should have picked up his option"

From Keith Schlosser:

"Shane Larkin arguably had one of the best games of his young career, tallying 14 points and a career-high 4 steals. In addition to serving as a pesky defender throughout, the guard went about his offensive game in an intelligent matter. He attacked the basket, and converted on all six of his free throws."

To each his own, I never said Larkin

Played the whole game bad

He didn't play "GREAT" or "VERY GOOD"

He was solid or let's say held his own

It was arguably one of Collison's better games of the yr

As was McCallum's and Stauskas guys Larkin got cross-matched with

F500ONE wrote:

mreinman wrote:

F500ONE wrote:

mreinman wrote:

F500ONE wrote:

Splat wrote:

F500ONE wrote:That was a giveth and taketh by Lark

But he's hustling nevertheless

You're pretty slow to adjust your bias in real time

If Shump were plus 50 with 38 points, 12 assists and six steals you probably wouldn't be able to spare a compliment for a game well played

Actually I've given credit to 2 players

Tonight Melo and Cole neither are my fancy

But sorry Kings backcourt have had greater impact

On the game I will not oversell anyone on this team

I kind of like THJR but he didn't play well enough

To give crazy kudos to him because he turnt up late

who cares how sac's back court did?

they were wide open off cousins killing us down low.

wtf does that have to do with how larkin played?

Because you have to play both sides of the ball

When players go off for career nights

You can't leverage the other side too much over the other

And PUH-LEEEZE don't use this game to pull the

"We should have picked up his option"

From Keith Schlosser:

"Shane Larkin arguably had one of the best games of his young career, tallying 14 points and a career-high 4 steals. In addition to serving as a pesky defender throughout, the guard went about his offensive game in an intelligent matter. He attacked the basket, and converted on all six of his free throws."

To each his own, I never said Larkin

Played the whole game bad

He didn't play "GREAT" or "VERY GOOD"

He was solid or let's say held his own

It was arguably one of Collison's better games of the yr

As was McCallum's and Stauskas guys Larkin got cross-matched with

you can just say "I made an oopsey" its ok

you are asking the same from Nix, right?

Larkin and aldrich were my two mvps from last night. Melo also had a good game