Sangfroid wrote:Nalod wrote:I propose to Martin and Andrew this become a sticky thread so all things Briggs can be in one place!
A good poster as such deserves his own place to post his ideas and videos.
Probably better to leave them as individual threads. That way , they get the attention that they deserve. Clumping them together leads to missed information.
Then maybe they should be in a diff forum? E.g. a draft forum?
Maybe some of us don't want to be inundated with 20 of these a day?
I would actually go into the sticky or a diff forum to read the info (when I want to) but this is starting to looking like my yahoo email inbox.
F500ONE wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Nalod wrote:mreinman wrote:that is funny!I second this motion.
really not trying to be cute here, As F500 said, it consolidates the Brigg'ness in to one easier to read thread.
Ill just post on realgm and leave you wise asses to yourselves.
Was this really necessary
Why wouldn't you want a dedicated thread with your Brand on it
For all of us to track, what's getting in the way of you supporting this
Hell I'd want my own thread.
alexs wrote:Nalod you're a jealous little shit
expand on that??
Jealous of what? POst count? Actually Im embarassed by it.
Alba counts?
Of his player evaluation talent? Briggs has no accountability like the rest of us.
If I put up 25 players im sure i'll come up with a few "hidden gems". Fact is, teams don't have the luxury of drafting 25 guys.
Im not slamming Briggs, Im just saying that NOBODY is accountable except the teams themselves!
I for one don't want to read 5 new threads a day. Maybe others don't.
Briggs has something to say, I just think the UK will be better served if it was done on one thread.
BTW, I don't do my own draft analysis. I like reading Briggs stuff and like I said, would be better conversing with others in one thread.
That make jealous? Then color me Green with Envy!!!
Imagine, a thread for the ages! Years of Brigg's players. We could easily access Whiteside! Redemption would be his!!!
Someone mentioned this the other day:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlMJfX_V6Ic[/YouTube]
Sangfroid wrote:Nalod wrote:I propose to Martin and Andrew this become a sticky thread so all things Briggs can be in one place!
A good poster as such deserves his own place to post his ideas and videos.
Probably better to leave them as individual threads. That way , they get the attention that they deserve. Clumping them together leads to missed information.
Wholeheartedly disagree as you could Google
1 thread and find the specific information desired by using word tags
This isn't the 1900s Froid
And to be quite Frank Briggs isn't getting too many hits
On his individual threads although there would be great value
In 1 Singular thread with his Brand on it
TPercy wrote:F500ONE wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Nalod wrote:mreinman wrote:that is funny!I second this motion.
really not trying to be cute here, As F500 said, it consolidates the Brigg'ness in to one easier to read thread.
Ill just post on realgm and leave you wise asses to yourselves.
Was this really necessary
Why wouldn't you want a dedicated thread with your Brand on it
For all of us to track, what's getting in the way of you supporting this
Hell I'd want my own thread.
Heck like mrman said take it a step further
A dedicated Draft Forum with his brand on it
D'angelo Russell is on the ESPN. We could talk about him here. But If I have to dig up the thread about him then its beyond.
Do we need a new D'angelo Russell thread?
Regarding Karl Anthony Towns, we could discuss him in the knick draft thread.
Or we can start another thread.
hell yea Towns and Kentucky at 9pm on ESPN!
BRIGGS wrote:Hector wrote:IF I was an NBA prospect, I'd love for BRIGGS to come see me on a good night!
Ive primarily said the same thing all year. If you look I picked Russell as pick #2 before anyone else on the Internet and Im the only dude who is saying Tyler Harvey and Christmas are mid first round picks. I found guys very early before even on radar like Upshaw and Zeek Woodley. Go look at my mocks--they tell the tale. Its easy to break them on someone when they try to share content with everyone and they have an opinion--but my opinion has been atleast reasonable. The draft is a fluid process you gather new information all year.
I was just messing with you.
You will be right some how some way because you have named just about every player in the draft!
Good for you though, if The Knicks were smart, they'd hire you to scout.
Hector wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Hector wrote:IF I was an NBA prospect, I'd love for BRIGGS to come see me on a good night!
Ive primarily said the same thing all year. If you look I picked Russell as pick #2 before anyone else on the Internet and Im the only dude who is saying Tyler Harvey and Christmas are mid first round picks. I found guys very early before even on radar like Upshaw and Zeek Woodley. Go look at my mocks--they tell the tale. Its easy to break them on someone when they try to share content with everyone and they have an opinion--but my opinion has been atleast reasonable. The draft is a fluid process you gather new information all year.
I was just messing with you.
You will be right some how some way because you have named just about every player in the draft!
Good for you though, if The Knicks were smart, they'd hire you to scout.
Melol very true 
Briggs is his own Branded Algorithm
He probably should invest in lots of computer technology
In a very scaled down stock market exchange operation
And invest his money, time, and energy in playing Fan Duel or Draftkings
Or try and get hired on with one of the major Sport Gaming Designers-Engineers
In the industry to help establish proper player rankings and talent pool system 
Doing what he does here lacks mindfulness and accomplishes nothing 
mreinman wrote:that is funny!I second this motion.
Actually it's a tad obnoxious. I will post here and if someone does not like it I suggest to use ignore feature
BRIGGS wrote:mreinman wrote:that is funny!I second this motion.
Actually it's a tad obnoxious. I will post here and if someone does not like it I suggest to use ignore feature
Actually it was a very novel idea by Nalod, because he included your name on thread
You could have became a very Official UK Mel Kiper or UK Johnathan Giovahny but instead
You're revolting and rather play the ESPN Frank role spoofing Kiper
But go ahead and carry on 1 of 3 of your threads drop off the first page
Fairly quickly with no one giving second thoughts about it
Although if in 1 thread they could reference back to it
As of now they serve as a resource for you to google yourself and bump
1 of your 10,000 threads created on the draft and collegiate foreign prospects
BRIGGS wrote:mreinman wrote:that is funny!I second this motion.
Actually it's a tad obnoxious. I will post here and if someone does not like it I suggest to use ignore feature
why? you should feel honored?
why not have your own thread?
Why take it personally? Be proud!
Why not centralize in one thread as opposed to scattering all over other threads?
Why not have a thread that can revisited again and again and actually have a timeline?
Don't get it. sorry.
mreinman wrote:BRIGGS wrote:mreinman wrote:that is funny!I second this motion.
Actually it's a tad obnoxious. I will post here and if someone does not like it I suggest to use ignore feature
why? you should feel honored?
why not have your own thread?
Why take it personally? Be proud!
Why not centralize in one thread as opposed to scattering all over other threads?
Why not have a thread that can revisited again and again and actually have a timeline?
Don't get it. sorry.
I think he wants to it to be more difficult
To catch him in his cunning is my only explanation
As in I guess it could be easier to pinpoint
All of his gaffes by going to one centralized thread
I guess that's what happens, when you try and put
Every single potential prospect inside the top 30
Then constantly juggling the Top 14 and the Top 10 and the Top 5 and the Top 3
F500ONE wrote:mreinman wrote:BRIGGS wrote:mreinman wrote:that is funny!I second this motion.
Actually it's a tad obnoxious. I will post here and if someone does not like it I suggest to use ignore feature
why? you should feel honored?
why not have your own thread?
Why take it personally? Be proud!
Why not centralize in one thread as opposed to scattering all over other threads?
Why not have a thread that can revisited again and again and actually have a timeline?
Don't get it. sorry.
I think he wants to it to be more difficult
To catch him in his cunning is my only explanation
As in I guess it could be easier to pinpoint
All of his gaffes by going to one centralized thread
I guess that's what happens, when you try and put
Every single potential prospect inside the top 30
Then constantly juggling the Top 14 and the Top 10 and the Top 5 and the Top 3
yeah ... don't get the hesitation.
F500ONE wrote:mreinman wrote:BRIGGS wrote:mreinman wrote:that is funny!I second this motion.
Actually it's a tad obnoxious. I will post here and if someone does not like it I suggest to use ignore feature
why? you should feel honored?
why not have your own thread?
Why take it personally? Be proud!
Why not centralize in one thread as opposed to scattering all over other threads?
Why not have a thread that can revisited again and again and actually have a timeline?
Don't get it. sorry.
I think he wants to it to be more difficult
To catch him in his cunning is my only explanation
As in I guess it could be easier to pinpoint
All of his gaffes by going to one centralized thread
I guess that's what happens, when you try and put
Every single potential prospect inside the top 30
Then constantly juggling the Top 14 and the Top 10 and the Top 5 and the Top 3
The mock draft process is fluid throughout the season--its very much like stock--they move up slightly or down slightly each week. My top 1-8 is starting to lock in- many of the mid range guys are there and then who knows about 23-30. The pick is in June. If I say watch this kid Zeek Woodley or Robert Upshaw Tyler harvey--its because I have done this for years--and Im just sharing it with everyone here--I mean this is a basketball thread:). Im sure most people appreciate it--and who cares if there are a couple of obnoxious people--that just life.
BRIGGS wrote:F500ONE wrote:mreinman wrote:BRIGGS wrote:mreinman wrote:that is funny!I second this motion.
Actually it's a tad obnoxious. I will post here and if someone does not like it I suggest to use ignore feature
why? you should feel honored?
why not have your own thread?
Why take it personally? Be proud!
Why not centralize in one thread as opposed to scattering all over other threads?
Why not have a thread that can revisited again and again and actually have a timeline?
Don't get it. sorry.
I think he wants to it to be more difficult
To catch him in his cunning is my only explanation
As in I guess it could be easier to pinpoint
All of his gaffes by going to one centralized thread
I guess that's what happens, when you try and put
Every single potential prospect inside the top 30
Then constantly juggling the Top 14 and the Top 10 and the Top 5 and the Top 3
The mock draft process is fluid throughout the season--its very much like stock--they move up slightly or down slightly each week. My top 1-8 is starting to lock in- many of the mid range guys are there and then who knows about 23-30. The pick is in June. If I say watch this kid Zeek Woodley or Robert Upshaw Tyler harvey--its because I have done this for years--and Im just sharing it with everyone here--I mean this is a basketball thread:). Im sure most people appreciate it--and who cares if there are a couple of obnoxious people--that just life.
Then you should agree to have 1 thread
Especially if you feel you're the Yoda of Draft Talk
You do realize much of what you post in singular threads can be missed
By not being encompassed in 1 thread, using the word fluid is an excuse and an aversion of integrity
Making hundreds-thousands of threads on it, is quite frankly OBNOXIOUS
