I'll take Noel, even though he is as fragile as a piece of glass.
H fills up the stat sheet. I like high energy players jumping all over the place.
Neither. If I had a vote it would go to Mirotic.
It should be Noel based on his minutes and production. That said, I think mirottic and Wiggins hasve met expectations.
It's Wiggins award to lose, and I seriously doubt he will. He's played well all season, not just a month or second half of a season and he doesnt come off the bench.
VCoug wrote:Neither. If I had a vote it would go to Mirotic.
Yeah based on the advanced stats, he's way ahead of Noel and Wiggins.
Mirotic should win in a land slide yet he probably won't because people look at/for the wrong things.
Metrics suggest that Mirotic ought to win...
Wiggins is hella nice though and much more talented.
TPercy wrote:Metrics suggest that Mirotic ought to win...
Wiggins is hella nice though and much more talented.
talent has nothing to do with it. If it did then maybe Jabari Parker is in the running too.
mreinman wrote:Mirotic should win in a land slide yet he probably won't because people look at/for the wrong things.
I think he'll get penalized because he plays the fewest minutes out of the three in a more limited role.
mreinman wrote:TPercy wrote:Metrics suggest that Mirotic ought to win...
Wiggins is hella nice though and much more talented.
talent has nothing to do with it. If it did then maybe Jabari Parker is in the running too.
I know it doesn't, I think Mirotic makes a good case of winning it, but I just think that in future Wiggins will be better player than Mirotic
TPercy wrote:mreinman wrote:TPercy wrote:Metrics suggest that Mirotic ought to win...
Wiggins is hella nice though and much more talented.
talent has nothing to do with it. If it did then maybe Jabari Parker is in the running too.
I know it doesn't, I think Mirotic makes a good case of winning it, but I just think that in future Wiggins will be better player than Mirotic
maybe ... not sure about that though. Mirotic has so many intangibles beyond athleticism ...
mreinman wrote:TPercy wrote:mreinman wrote:TPercy wrote:Metrics suggest that Mirotic ought to win...
Wiggins is hella nice though and much more talented.
talent has nothing to do with it. If it did then maybe Jabari Parker is in the running too.
I know it doesn't, I think Mirotic makes a good case of winning it, but I just think that in future Wiggins will be better player than Mirotic
maybe ... not sure about that though. Mirotic has so many intangibles beyond athleticism ...
Mirotic is older and basically came into the NBA with years of experience playing high end international competition.
mreinman wrote:TPercy wrote:mreinman wrote:TPercy wrote:Metrics suggest that Mirotic ought to win...
Wiggins is hella nice though and much more talented.
talent has nothing to do with it. If it did then maybe Jabari Parker is in the running too.
I know it doesn't, I think Mirotic makes a good case of winning it, but I just think that in future Wiggins will be better player than Mirotic
maybe ... not sure about that though. Mirotic has so many intangibles beyond athleticism ...
And Wiggins has so far to go just to catch up right now. Based on the BBall reference #s, he's costing his team 11 points every 100 possessions. 82Games has his opponent PER at 1.9 higher than his own.
BigDaddyG wrote:mreinman wrote:TPercy wrote:mreinman wrote:TPercy wrote:Metrics suggest that Mirotic ought to win...
Wiggins is hella nice though and much more talented.
talent has nothing to do with it. If it did then maybe Jabari Parker is in the running too.
I know it doesn't, I think Mirotic makes a good case of winning it, but I just think that in future Wiggins will be better player than Mirotic
maybe ... not sure about that though. Mirotic has so many intangibles beyond athleticism ...
Mirotic is older and basically came into the NBA with years of experience playing high end international competition.
right ... too early to speculate.
If rookie of the year goes to Wiggins it would be embarrassing for the NBA and the voters will look like idiots.
mreinman wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:mreinman wrote:TPercy wrote:mreinman wrote:TPercy wrote:Metrics suggest that Mirotic ought to win...
Wiggins is hella nice though and much more talented.
talent has nothing to do with it. If it did then maybe Jabari Parker is in the running too.
I know it doesn't, I think Mirotic makes a good case of winning it, but I just think that in future Wiggins will be better player than Mirotic
maybe ... not sure about that though. Mirotic has so many intangibles beyond athleticism ...
Mirotic is older and basically came into the NBA with years of experience playing high end international competition.
right ... too early to speculate.
If rookie of the year goes to Wiggins it would be embarrassing for the NBA and the voters will look like idiots.
Yup I've always hated sinceday 1 the idea of fans voting. Most fans(except the ones like us) don't know anything about bball and all they look at are highlights on NBA gametme when they can and make stuid assumptions about the players
Hector wrote:I'll take Noel, even though he is as fragile as a piece of glass.H fills up the stat sheet. I like high energy players jumping all over the place.
Elfrid Payton.
newyorker4ever wrote:Hector wrote:I'll take Noel, even though he is as fragile as a piece of glass.H fills up the stat sheet. I like high energy players jumping all over the place.
Elfrid Payton.
jk?
