BigDaddyG wrote:DeAndre Jordan just cost the Clippers the series.
I wouldn't put It on him since the ball was going to miss anyway
Spurs just won't relinquish it. Mixed bag from them all night but their street wise was just too much. Too many mistakes, missed FT's and Paul/Griffin carrying too much load for the Clippers. SA end this on Thursday.
Clippers only made ONE 3pt shot (Spurs made 11) in the whole game and their bench was outscored by 31pts !!!
Geico. Commercial- "when you play the spurs in the playoffs you 're going to lose. It's what you do"
yellowboy90 wrote:BigDaddyG wrote:DeAndre Jordan just cost the Clippers the series.
I wouldn't put It on him since the ball was going to miss anyway
After watching It again it might have went in on it's own. That's a heartbreaker
i know deandre jordan is a good defender, great dunker and nice defender but hes SUCH a liability on the free throw line. and as we saw, the mental mistakes he makes can cost a team. this was a team effort and i wont say that deandre lost the game for them but the spurs knew to EXPLOIT his weaknesses. Thats why i would never give him a max contract
callmened wrote:i know deandre jordan is a good defender, great dunker and nice defender but hes SUCH a liability on the free throw line. and as we saw, the mental mistakes he makes can cost a team. this was a team effort and i wont say that deandre lost the game for them but the spurs knew to EXPLOIT his weaknesses. Thats why i would never give him a max contract
I mean shaq shot 58% from the ft line and mange to win 4 rings. Here's a few other thing to think about, jamal is avg close to 30 minutes and is shooting 17% from the land of 3, thats 4 for 26 and 35% fg overall. Docs rotation has been very woodson like too.
This Spurs team is just one of the best teams of all time. They had no business winning that game. Duncan is incredible. I feel like he could play until he's 45. His block on Griffin. Man.
Spurs were the best team in the regular season against the Warriors, if both teams can get to the WCF.
That graphic looks about right. I like the Clippers and they are clearly a top five team right now but . . . I'd guess the Spurs are about twice as likely to beat Golden State. And, I'd pick the Spurs, at maybe 60/40 to beat Golden State if everyone is health. However, by the time the Spurs play GS (assuming they make it past Memphis), I'll be surprised if the Spurs aren't missing at least one starter to injury.
I feel bad for KLove...I wanted to see him in the ECF and maybe the Finals..Just to get a chance to redeem himself as a player..Out 4-6 months after surgery..I won't mind taking a shot at him at the right price in the off season...Get well soon!!
Portland offensive possessions are just awful..Aldrige, Liliard, Batum all taking horrible shots..Have to be the coaching..
The Trailblazers body language and effort levels are terrible. Only a few of them even look like they care.
holfresh wrote:Portland offensive possessions are just awful..Aldrige, Liliard, Batum all taking horrible shots..Had to be the coaching..
Just really lazy and don't give a damn.
holfresh wrote:Portland offensive possessions are just awful..Aldrige, Liliard, Batum all taking horrible shots..Have to be the coaching..
this is the same coach that they had last year?
could it be the player? If aldridge can just jack em up then why can the rest of us just jack em up?
If your star plays smart/takes smart shots then its easier to get the team to buy in.
Aldridge takes stupid shots. Lets not blame the coach for a veteran taking so many stupid shots.
Wow. Bulls up by 32. Just tuned why did Gianni's get tossed.
CrushAlot wrote:Wow. Bulls up by 32. Just tuned why did Gianni's get tossed.
He did an NFL style body blow to Dunleavy..Knocked him out out bounds doing it..Ran up court to do it after Dunleavy pushed him down on the other end..
Ot: crush do you have playlater with playon? IF so, are those products worth it?
yellowboy90 wrote:Ot: crush do you have playlater with playon? IF so, are those products worth it?
I don't have play later. I didn't think play later was worth it. I did pay an extra $5.00 for hd. I do like playon. For basketball ball streams is a lot better. But playon is a lot like Netflix in that there is a huge library of on demand content. Also, if you get it you might be able to stream the fight on Saturday. You can add third party plugins. The two I recommend for sports are Coolsports and VIP Sports. Another perk to playon is you can watch the free version of Hulu on your tv.
What happens to the Clippers if they get bumped in the first round?..Probably nothing..
CrushAlot wrote:yellowboy90 wrote:Ot: crush do you have playlater with playon? IF so, are those products worth it?
I don't have play later. I didn't think play later was worth it. I did pay an extra $5.00 for hd. I do like playon. For basketball ball streams is a lot better. But playon is a lot like Netflix in that there is a huge library of on demand content. Also, if you get it you might be able to stream the fight on Saturday. You can add third party plugins. The two I recommend for sports are Coolsports and VIP Sports. Another perk to playon is you can watch the free version of Hulu on your tv.
Okay, Playlater was what had me intrigued because I read that playon was spotty. It's nice to see another good opinion for playon. They have a special for $50 lifetime subscription for both so I'm probably going to take it. I am in the process of cutting the cord and I think it might be worth it. I think I am going to go to the amazon fire and install kodi on it. I see that it doesn't say playon is compatible with firetv but there may be a way to sideload it some how. Regardless I still have a roku 1 to use playon with.
Anyway, playlater intrigues me because there are some videos on youtube, Netflix, Hulu, and etc that go in and out of rotation.
Thanks for the info, I really appreciate it. I'll likely get Ballstreams next season so thanks for telling me(and the board) about that too.
