yeah i saw. $17.5 mill. talented big on offense
Will cost the thunder $40mil this year including luxury tax, though if they match, they may be able to shift novak and another players salary.
this dudes number went from d league to nba star in a matter of months
smackeddog wrote:Will cost the thunder $40mil this year including luxury tax, though if they match, they may be able to shift novak and another players salary.
We could use a TPE for a 2016 #1st round draft pick and just release the players. 5mm+ for late 1st rounder is fair.
BRIGGS wrote:smackeddog wrote:Will cost the thunder $. 40mil this year including luxury tax, though if they match, they may be able to shift novak and another players salary.
We could use a TPE for a 2016 #1st round draft pick and just release the players. 5mm+ for late 1st rounder is fair.
2016 to Philly, 2018 to Utah. both picks protected 1-15. They do however have a couple of extra 2nd round picks. We would then only have the 2.8M exception left to add a player
BRIGGS wrote:smackeddog wrote:Will cost the thunder $40mil this year including luxury tax, though if they match, they may be able to shift novak and another players salary.
We could use a TPE for a 2016 #1st round draft pick and just release the players. 5mm+ for late 1st rounder is fair.
I don't think we have room under the cap to do that - we have the exception and then a bit extra - not sure they can be combined.
I think we are pretty much down - I'd expect our cash is being saved for players from last year (Shved), SL players that make the team & any incidentals out of training camp where a player on another squad gets released.
Rookie wrote:BRIGGS wrote:smackeddog wrote:Will cost the thunder $. 40mil this year including luxury tax, though if they match, they may be able to shift novak and another players salary.
We could use a TPE for a 2016 #1st round draft pick and just release the players. 5mm+ for late 1st rounder is fair.
2016 to Philly, 2018 to Utah. both picks protected 1-15. They do however have a couple of extra 2nd round picks. We would then only have the 2.8M exception left to add a player
Id take a 2020 1st round pick(1-15) + 2 2seconds. It just gives us future arsenal.
BRIGGS wrote:Rookie wrote:BRIGGS wrote:smackeddog wrote:Will cost the thunder $. 40mil this year including luxury tax, though if they match, they may be able to shift novak and another players salary.
We could use a TPE for a 2016 #1st round draft pick and just release the players. 5mm+ for late 1st rounder is fair.
2016 to Philly, 2018 to Utah. both picks protected 1-15. They do however have a couple of extra 2nd round picks. We would then only have the 2.8M exception left to add a player
Id take a 2020 1st round pick(1-15) + 2 2seconds. It just gives us future arsenal.
sure lets going ahead and fantasy pillage another team.
That signing just made Jax look alot smarter locking up Lopez
meloanyk wrote:That signing just made Jax look alot smarter locking up Lopez
The team that dumped Lopez was the team who signed Kanter. Lopez wasnt very good last year and was worse down the stretch. Maybe new location will help pump him back up but my guess is Portland has much more info on Lopez than we do.
BRIGGS wrote:meloanyk wrote:That signing just made Jax look alot smarter locking up Lopez
The team that dumped Lopez was the team who signed Kanter. Lopez wasnt very good last year and was worse down the stretch. Maybe new location will help pump him back up but my guess is Portland has much more info on Lopez than we do.
Lopez had a WS48 last year of .150.
That is very very good.
mreinman wrote:BRIGGS wrote:meloanyk wrote:That signing just made Jax look alot smarter locking up Lopez
The team that dumped Lopez was the team who signed Kanter. Lopez wasnt very good last year and was worse down the stretch. Maybe new location will help pump him back up but my guess is Portland has much more info on Lopez than we do.
Lopez had a WS48 last year of .150.
That is very very good.
Id say OKC and the Portland Trailblazers are pretty well run teams compared to the Knicks.
I would happily take Steve Novak back if they toss in a pick.
BRIGGS wrote:mreinman wrote:BRIGGS wrote:meloanyk wrote:That signing just made Jax look alot smarter locking up Lopez
The team that dumped Lopez was the team who signed Kanter. Lopez wasnt very good last year and was worse down the stretch. Maybe new location will help pump him back up but my guess is Portland has much more info on Lopez than we do.
Lopez had a WS48 last year of .150.
That is very very good.
Id say OKC and the Portland Trailblazers are pretty well run teams compared to the Knicks.
OKC is the team that gave up Harden which was one of the worst NBA move in many many years and Portland (who is well run) just lost Aldridge and are not in great shape.
Are you saying that Lopez must not be that good if Portland chose not to retain him? I think that we did possibly over pay for him but we had no choice and that Portland is looking to change things up.
Lopez is a very good player who actually plays team ball and defends very well. It was a very good get by Phil.
mreinman wrote:BRIGGS wrote:meloanyk wrote:That signing just made Jax look alot smarter locking up Lopez
The team that dumped Lopez was the team who signed Kanter. Lopez wasnt very good last year and was worse down the stretch. Maybe new location will help pump him back up but my guess is Portland has much more info on Lopez than we do.
Lopez had a WS48 last year of .150.
That is very very good.
.176 in 2014 which was 19th best in entire league. Good sign by Phil
name me one player that we have close to
Lilliard
Wesley Matthews
Battum
Aldridge
Lopez was the WORST player in that starting lineup but some posters will take the WIN SHARE LIST and run with it...
This is where I have to agree with Sir Charle's thoughts on advanced stats
Affalo was put in the SL and WAS HORRIBLE....
On OKC, willing to pay up for Kanter but not for James Harden, yeah, there were posters here that thought that OKC won in the trade when it happened...
RonRon wrote:name me one player that we have close toLilliard
Wesley Matthews
Battum
Aldridge
Lopez was the WORST player in that starting lineup but some posters will take the WIN SHARE LIST and run with it...
This is where I have to agree with Sir Charle's thoughts on advanced stats
Affalo was put in the SL and WAS HORRIBLE....
On OKC, willing to pay up for Kanter but not for James Harden, yeah, there were posters here that thought that OKC won in the trade when it happened...
who was those players before Lopez went to Portland anyone, anyone?
mreinman wrote:BRIGGS wrote:mreinman wrote:BRIGGS wrote:meloanyk wrote:That signing just made Jax look alot smarter locking up Lopez
The team that dumped Lopez was the team who signed Kanter. Lopez wasnt very good last year and was worse down the stretch. Maybe new location will help pump him back up but my guess is Portland has much more info on Lopez than we do.
Lopez had a WS48 last year of .150.
That is very very good.
Id say OKC and the Portland Trailblazers are pretty well run teams compared to the Knicks.
OKC is the team that gave up Harden which was one of the worst NBA move in many many years and Portland (who is well run) just lost Aldridge and are not in great shape.
Are you saying that Lopez must not be that good if Portland chose not to retain him? I think that we did possibly over pay for him but we had no choice and that Portland is looking to change things up.
Lopez is a very good player who actually plays team ball and defends very well. It was a very good get by Phil.
Really? Have you actually looked at the Blazer roster recently?
http://www.nba.com/blazers/roster
I'd take that team over what the Knicks all day. They have a lot of young promising talent that you cannot even begin to compare to this roster.
RonRon wrote:name me one player that we have close toLilliard
Wesley Matthews
Battum
Aldridge
Lopez was the WORST player in that starting lineup but some posters will take the WIN SHARE LIST and run with it...
This is where I have to agree with Sir Charle's thoughts on advanced stats
Affalo was put in the SL and WAS HORRIBLE....
On OKC, willing to pay up for Kanter but not for James Harden, yeah, there were posters here that thought that OKC won in the trade when it happened...
you want to agree with Barkley on advanced stats because you both don't know much about them so its easier to just not deal with it while every team is extremely invested and bought in.
all the players that are getting paid happen to all pretty much be high advanced stat players. Inefficient eye candy players don't fly anymore.
Time to get with the future.
