mreinman wrote:nick buckets
???????
BRIGGS wrote:Knicks1969 wrote:BRIGGS wrote:I once liked Tyreke but I dont think he fits in here. Lance Stephenson--why do people keep saying his name--do his cousins post on here?
Why doesn't he fit BRIGGS???
Why T F would we want Lance Stephenson? He cant shoot the 3 he is an undisciplined basketball player and he has had character problems?????
I was referring to TE, not LS. You said you don't think he would fit in NY
Would you trade: KO, Seraphin, Calderon, and Early for Evans, Asik and a draft pick?
newyorker4ever wrote:nyk4ever wrote:they would never improve under a hack of a headcoach, like fisher 
Yeah you know what you're talking about cause clearly DW, LT, KP and Gallo haven't improved at all under Fisher. Hahahaha the things some of you say.
dude it was fucking sarcastic.
Tyreke is quite ball dominating and needs the ball on his hands "to be effective" and may not suit the triangle. But given the comparison is Lance, I choose Tyreke.
crzymdups wrote:Dear god. NEITHER.
Yeah. Pretty much. They both have huge drawbacks, bad contracts and worse personalities.
Desperate times call for desperate measures. CLippers are looking for a third team to trade Lance so they can acquire one of Isiah's Knicks former lottery pick (Frye); we need to improve our back court and Lance can help. We need to get in that deal
http://www.orlandopinstripedpost.com/201...
Knicks1969 wrote:Desperate times call for desperate measures. CLippers are looking for a third team to trade Lance so they can acquire one of Isiah's Knicks former lottery pick (Frye); we need to improve our back court and Lance can help. We need to get in that deal
http://www.orlandopinstripedpost.com/201...
Wojo reported that the Clippers are trying to complete a bigger deal that they would need Lance's salary slot for. Lance has a team option for next year so teams may take him as a salary dump. The potential bigger deal is pretty interesting. Other than Blake and Crawford, I haven't heard of any Clippers being dealt.
callmened wrote:um NEITHER!
Just Lance dude. I don't care what any of you think about Lance, he is far better than Jose. Time to bring born-ready back to NY
Knicks1969 wrote:callmened wrote:um NEITHER!
Just Lance dude. I don't care what any of you think about Lance, he is far better than Jose. Time to bring born-ready back to NY
they don't play the same position, so comparing them is kind of silly. what specifically makes lance better than jose?
I know Lance is probably a bad idea, but I admit to being fascinated with the idea of him turning around his career here.
I feel like Phil's good teams often had a headcase like Rodman or Artest and Lance could fill that role.
Also, his best season was under Brian Shaw in the pseudo-Triangle Indiana ran. Hire Shaw as Rambis's assistant and have him work with Lance.
I think Lance could be great here. He's a defensive stopper at the 2/3, a very good playmaker, a bully ball wing. We need a type like that
Knicks1969 wrote:callmened wrote:um NEITHER!
Just Lance dude. I don't care what any of you think about Lance, he is far better than Jose. Time to bring born-ready back to NY
listen IM BETTER than jose. doesnt mean we should pick up garbage like lance or the jimmer. lol
I don't know why buy I am intrigued by Stephenson if we would trade him for Jose or get him if he's been cut. Solid defender. Used to be able to play the point some or at least initiate offense. Maybe looking to resurrect career or new contract after season. His shot has turned awful though
nyk4ever wrote:Knicks1969 wrote:callmened wrote:um NEITHER!
Just Lance dude. I don't care what any of you think about Lance, he is far better than Jose. Time to bring born-ready back to NY
they don't play the same position, so comparing them is kind of silly. what specifically makes lance better than jose?
Versatility....lance can play three positions on the floor and can defend. Jose! Don't get me started
martin wrote:I don't know why buy I am intrigued by Stephenson if we would trade him for Jose or get him if he's been cut. Solid defender. Used to be able to play the point some or at least initiate offense. Maybe looking to resurrect career or new contract after season. His shot has turned awful though
+1 to all this
martin wrote:I don't know why buy I am intrigued by Stephenson if we would trade him for Jose or get him if he's been cut. Solid defender. Used to be able to play the point some or at least initiate offense. Maybe looking to resurrect career or new contract after season. His shot has turned awful though
Made pretty much the same exact post in the trade thread,totally agree with you. As long as he's virtually free, I'm down with taking a flier on lance
BRIGGS wrote:Knicks1969 wrote:BRIGGS wrote:I once liked Tyreke but I dont think he fits in here. Lance Stephenson--why do people keep saying his name--do his cousins post on here?
Why doesn't he fit BRIGGS???
Why T F would we want Lance Stephenson? He cant shoot the 3 he is an undisciplined basketball player and he has had character problems?????
That Phil Jackson can fix ...
I've been trying to make the case for Lance coming here since last summer. For some reason I see it working... I might be crazy...
crzymdups wrote:I've been trying to make the case for Lance coming here since last summer. For some reason I see it working... I might be crazy...
I agree. Also, Lance is only 25. Seems like e has been around forever. I think he is te ame age as Rautins was when the Knicks took him ahead of lance.
Some here want to give Jimmer and Rotten a chance, but not to the proven Lance who is one of NewYork's finest? We have a bunch of good guys on the roster now, We need a bad boy to spice things up
