They said it would be 3 years before KP can contribute. Turns out, it will be 3 years before Fisher can contribute. He's loyal to PJ and a safe choice, can't take that away from him.
teamsport72 wrote:They said it would be 3 years before KP can contribute. Turns out, it will be 3 years before Fisher can contribute. He's loyal to PJ and a safe choice, can't take that away from him.
I think Fisher gets next year to prove himself if Phil can give him a team that can win. If things don't work out this off season and Phil puts everything on hold for the following season then he'll get that season to prove himself. I don't think Phil has lost confidence in Fisher yet.
what is the point of this?
Still pushing for Thibs in the offseason. Fisher can move to the front office. BTW Thibs and not Jackson is the winningest coach in Bulls history, just saying
nyk4ever wrote:what is the point of this?
The point is some people feel hoodwinked and bamboozled by the fishy in-game coaching?
teamsport72 wrote:nyk4ever wrote:what is the point of this?
The point is some people feel hoodwinked and bamboozled by the fishy in-game coaching?
hoodwinked and bamboozled? bit egregious, no? doesn't make a whole lot of sense. for the most part, we have a young roster, as well as a young coach. there are bumps in the road when you have either, especially when you have both at the same time. if you feel hoodwinked and bamboozled by this then i guess no team should ever hire a rookie head coach. and please, spare me the steve kerr example. the warriors would be right where they are at if any one of us were coaching them.
Rookie wrote:Still pushing for Thibs in the offseason. Fisher can move to the front office. BTW Thibs and not Jackson is the winningest coach in Bulls history, just saying
Isn't Phil's regular season Bulls coaching winning percentage .738 and Thibs is .647 ?
teamsport72 wrote:They said it would be 3 years before KP can contribute. Turns out, it will be 3 years before Fisher can contribute. He's loyal to PJ and a safe choice, can't take that away from him.
Giving fisher's performance, I believe it might take that dude 5 years. Phil is not really helping this dude by not surrounding him with a former headcoach who Experience success in the NBA
newyorker4ever wrote:teamsport72 wrote:They said it would be 3 years before KP can contribute. Turns out, it will be 3 years before Fisher can contribute. He's loyal to PJ and a safe choice, can't take that away from him.
I think Fisher gets next year to prove himself if Phil can give him a team that can win. If things don't work out this off season and Phil puts everything on hold for the following season then he'll get that season to prove himself. I don't think Phil has lost confidence in Fisher yet.
Would you give him another year; specifically if Walton shows interest????
nyk4ever wrote:teamsport72 wrote:nyk4ever wrote:what is the point of this?
The point is some people feel hoodwinked and bamboozled by the fishy in-game coaching?
hoodwinked and bamboozled? bit egregious, no? doesn't make a whole lot of sense. for the most part, we have a young roster, as well as a young coach. there are bumps in the road when you have either, especially when you have both at the same time. if you feel hoodwinked and bamboozled by this then i guess no team should ever hire a rookie head coach. and please, spare me the steve kerr example. the warriors would be right where they are at if any one of us were coaching them.
Beyond me to answer any of this, too much, my friend.
teamsport72 wrote:nyk4ever wrote:teamsport72 wrote:nyk4ever wrote:what is the point of this?
The point is some people feel hoodwinked and bamboozled by the fishy in-game coaching?
hoodwinked and bamboozled? bit egregious, no? doesn't make a whole lot of sense. for the most part, we have a young roster, as well as a young coach. there are bumps in the road when you have either, especially when you have both at the same time. if you feel hoodwinked and bamboozled by this then i guess no team should ever hire a rookie head coach. and please, spare me the steve kerr example. the warriors would be right where they are at if any one of us were coaching them.
Beyond me to answer any of this, too much, my friend.
oh ok, i'll make sure to keep things at an elementary level for you from now on.
