Was Woody that bad here? He's prob a good fit. Feed Boogie and get the rest of em to play defense. If the team sucks its on the GM.
The problem is they won't be able to attract top-tier coach. They will have to funnel through the mike woodsons and vinny del negros of the world. Guys who have a lot of experience but not the top coaching candidates. For that, i would just take a chance on a young guy who can hopefully grow into the position like Brad Stevens is doing. Phoenix might not be so bad off with Earl Watson. Think outside of the box a little instead of just hiring these guys who have bounced around for years with moderate success.
Woodson was a very good coach.
crzymdups wrote:Woodson was a very good coach.
That's why he can't hold a head coaching job and will spend most of his career as a assistant.
Im sure most fans say that about us, the past 16 years have been brutal
Poor poor Sacramento fans? I'm pretty sure they've had much more success recently than the Knicks in this century alone.
Their Rick Adelman teams with C-Webb, Divac, Stojakovic, and Bibby pushed the Lakers to the limit game 7 in the Western Conference Finals in 2002.
Stupid post, we've been the laughing stock for the whole 21st century.
ChuckBuck wrote:Poor poor Sacramento fans? I'm pretty sure they've had much more success recently than the Knicks in this century alone.Their Rick Adelman teams with C-Webb, Divac, Stojakovic, and Bibby pushed the Lakers to the limit game 7 in the Western Conference Finals in 2002.
Stupid post, we've been the laughing stock for the whole 21st century.
i love the knicks but some people act like we are a world class organization. Believe me id love to have a reputation like the spurs, it just simply isnt reality. Back in the 90s we were a world class organization but its been a lot of years and a lot of bonehead decisions
StarksEwing1 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Poor poor Sacramento fans? I'm pretty sure they've had much more success recently than the Knicks in this century alone.Their Rick Adelman teams with C-Webb, Divac, Stojakovic, and Bibby pushed the Lakers to the limit game 7 in the Western Conference Finals in 2002.
Stupid post, we've been the laughing stock for the whole 21st century.
i love the knicks but some people act like we are a world class organization. Believe me id love to have a reputation like the spurs, it just simply isnt reality. Back in the 90s we were a world class organization but its been a lot of years and a lot of bonehead decisions
Seems more like he is making fun of Woodson (who is a solid coach) rather then him making fun of the Kings org. I doubt he would care about the Kings coaching situation other then the fact that Woodson use to coach us and him not being a fan.
newyorknewyork wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Poor poor Sacramento fans? I'm pretty sure they've had much more success recently than the Knicks in this century alone.Their Rick Adelman teams with C-Webb, Divac, Stojakovic, and Bibby pushed the Lakers to the limit game 7 in the Western Conference Finals in 2002.
Stupid post, we've been the laughing stock for the whole 21st century.
i love the knicks but some people act like we are a world class organization. Believe me id love to have a reputation like the spurs, it just simply isnt reality. Back in the 90s we were a world class organization but its been a lot of years and a lot of bonehead decisions
Seems more like he is making fun of Woodson (who is a solid coach) rather then him making fun of the Kings org. I doubt he would care about the Kings coaching situation other then the fact that Woodson use to coach us and him not being a fan.
What's the point of making fun of an average to mediocre coach that got shyt canned by a dysfunctional organization in the Knicks? Is that supposed to prop us up or something, because really it's the opposite effect.
ChuckBuck wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Poor poor Sacramento fans? I'm pretty sure they've had much more success recently than the Knicks in this century alone.Their Rick Adelman teams with C-Webb, Divac, Stojakovic, and Bibby pushed the Lakers to the limit game 7 in the Western Conference Finals in 2002.
Stupid post, we've been the laughing stock for the whole 21st century.
i love the knicks but some people act like we are a world class organization. Believe me id love to have a reputation like the spurs, it just simply isnt reality. Back in the 90s we were a world class organization but its been a lot of years and a lot of bonehead decisions
Seems more like he is making fun of Woodson (who is a solid coach) rather then him making fun of the Kings org. I doubt he would care about the Kings coaching situation other then the fact that Woodson use to coach us and him not being a fan.
What's the point of making fun of an average to mediocre coach that got shyt canned by a dysfunctional organization in the Knicks? Is that supposed to prop us up or something, because really it's the opposite effect.
Don't know he hasn't replied in the thread he created yet. But the odds are very high that he randomly stumbled on the Mike Woodson news through one of the various blogs he follows. Then felt the desire to crack a light hearted joke about the news he stumbled on. Which would make sense of him not really engaging in the thread afterward. As he never really took it seriously.
Woodson also wasn't shit canned. His contract expired and Phil didnt retain him probably due to desiring Kerr.
newyorknewyork wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Poor poor Sacramento fans? I'm pretty sure they've had much more success recently than the Knicks in this century alone.Their Rick Adelman teams with C-Webb, Divac, Stojakovic, and Bibby pushed the Lakers to the limit game 7 in the Western Conference Finals in 2002.
Stupid post, we've been the laughing stock for the whole 21st century.
i love the knicks but some people act like we are a world class organization. Believe me id love to have a reputation like the spurs, it just simply isnt reality. Back in the 90s we were a world class organization but its been a lot of years and a lot of bonehead decisions
Seems more like he is making fun of Woodson (who is a solid coach) rather then him making fun of the Kings org. I doubt he would care about the Kings coaching situation other then the fact that Woodson use to coach us and him not being a fan.
What's the point of making fun of an average to mediocre coach that got shyt canned by a dysfunctional organization in the Knicks? Is that supposed to prop us up or something, because really it's the opposite effect.
Don't know he hasn't replied in the thread he created yet. But the odds are very high that he randomly stumbled on the Mike Woodson news through one of the various blogs he follows. Then felt the desire to crack a light hearted joke about the news he stumbled on. Which would make sense of him not really engaging in the thread afterward. As he never really took it seriously.
Woodson also wasn't shit canned. His contract expired and Phil didnt retain him probably due to desiring Kerr.
Says shit canned right here. There was no expiration, it was a "see ya later, don't let the door hit your ass on the way out" type ordeal.
http://espn.go.com/new-york/nba/story/_/...
ChuckBuck wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:ChuckBuck wrote:Poor poor Sacramento fans? I'm pretty sure they've had much more success recently than the Knicks in this century alone.Their Rick Adelman teams with C-Webb, Divac, Stojakovic, and Bibby pushed the Lakers to the limit game 7 in the Western Conference Finals in 2002.
Stupid post, we've been the laughing stock for the whole 21st century.
i love the knicks but some people act like we are a world class organization. Believe me id love to have a reputation like the spurs, it just simply isnt reality. Back in the 90s we were a world class organization but its been a lot of years and a lot of bonehead decisions
Seems more like he is making fun of Woodson (who is a solid coach) rather then him making fun of the Kings org. I doubt he would care about the Kings coaching situation other then the fact that Woodson use to coach us and him not being a fan.
What's the point of making fun of an average to mediocre coach that got shyt canned by a dysfunctional organization in the Knicks? Is that supposed to prop us up or something, because really it's the opposite effect.
Don't know he hasn't replied in the thread he created yet. But the odds are very high that he randomly stumbled on the Mike Woodson news through one of the various blogs he follows. Then felt the desire to crack a light hearted joke about the news he stumbled on. Which would make sense of him not really engaging in the thread afterward. As he never really took it seriously.
Woodson also wasn't shit canned. His contract expired and Phil didnt retain him probably due to desiring Kerr.
Says shit canned right here. There was no expiration, it was a "see ya later, don't let the door hit your ass on the way out" type ordeal.
http://espn.go.com/new-york/nba/story/_/...
Yea your right he had one more year. Though he was let go for the same reasons that Thibbs won't be brought in.
newyorker4ever wrote:crzymdups wrote:Woodson was a very good coach.
That's why he can't hold a head coaching job and will spend most of his career as a assistant.
He got Bargnani'd
