knicks1248 wrote:EnySpree wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Now it should get interesting with the coaching staff and the fate of Rambis.
Only if you are more concerned with drama than basketball.
drama and the knicks go hand and hand,like why only 3 yrs..
Holy crap you are just like the new york media people cause you always find something to try to make it look bad just like the media is already trying to do.
Got really horny when I read the breaking news...
newyorker4ever wrote:EnySpree wrote:Seems like Phil does have an end game because everyone is done at the same time. I really feel like hes sticking to a plan to win big during the course of his contract.
I think what his goal is is to leave this team in the best possible position he can and doesn't care if the winning happens while he's still here as long as their a team that's built to win for a long time and don't have a bunch of bad contracts and have all their draft picks.
How would you know if you build a winning team if they are not winning..if by yr 3 we are 3rd or 4th in the east, then you can say I put you guys on track, but if you leave with a (suppose good roster) as the 8th or 9 best team in the east..thats not winning
newyorker4ever wrote:knicks1248 wrote:EnySpree wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Now it should get interesting with the coaching staff and the fate of Rambis.
Only if you are more concerned with drama than basketball.
drama and the knicks go hand and hand,like why only 3 yrs..
Holy crap you are just like the new york media people cause you always find something to try to make it look bad just like the media is already trying to do.
I question why only 3 instead of 4 or 5, and you call that drama..smh, I'm sure there multiple reasons why, just a question..relax dude
knicks1248 wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:EnySpree wrote:Seems like Phil does have an end game because everyone is done at the same time. I really feel like hes sticking to a plan to win big during the course of his contract.
I think what his goal is is to leave this team in the best possible position he can and doesn't care if the winning happens while he's still here as long as their a team that's built to win for a long time and don't have a bunch of bad contracts and have all their draft picks.
How would you know if you build a winning team if they are not winning..if by yr 3 we are 3rd or 4th in the east, then you can say I put you guys on track, but if you leave with a (suppose good roster) as the 8th or 9 best team in the east..thats not winning
His goal is to do it. It hasn't been so yet but it's building. You are one of those fans that suck the life out of the rest of us. They suck until they don't. You don't care about the rebuild. You want it to go immediately to winning with no connection as to how it happened. Damn vampire
knicks1248 wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:knicks1248 wrote:EnySpree wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Now it should get interesting with the coaching staff and the fate of Rambis.
Only if you are more concerned with drama than basketball.
drama and the knicks go hand and hand,like why only 3 yrs..
Holy crap you are just like the new york media people cause you always find something to try to make it look bad just like the media is already trying to do.
I question why only 3 instead of 4 or 5, and you call that drama..smh, I'm sure there multiple reasons why, just a question..relax dude
My best guess would be because its the same exact length as Phil. I'm sire it will be asked at the PC
