Knicks · Do you agree? w/Top 50 Knicks, in NYK History (Fall 2015 reprise/post)..has Ew,Clyde,Pearl,Melo,Reed,Debusschere (page 1)

Well

just an minor opinion, Only few players I have a prob.s with on this top 50 list is:
Don't agree with Rory Sparrow and Nate Robinson on this list at all, just a few cited

Neither Nate or Rory was Knicks long enough to make team impacts as far as improvements.
For example I think Nate perhaps at his position was good or better than Kenny 'Sky' Walker
however though BOTH won NBA slam dunk contests I think few Kenny Walker teams went to NBA playoffs
and Kenny isn't even on this list, which I have no problem with.

Thus Nate does not belong on list & I like Nate. Rory was decent PG few bad Knicks teams(1 playoffs? twice)

However Rory is on list & Bill Bradley isn't? I don't have big issue on Bradley but if he isn't on list
with Rory Sparrow making top 50, that's absurd! Bill could be there before Rory, longer tenure, 2 NBA Champ titles
& better NBA Career.

What do you think ? I don't have issue with where 1-10 has Patrick Ew, Clyde ahead of Melo, Reed, Steph & LJ.
Most of the list I agree with, is there some NY Knick great ? that is left out ?

http://hoopshype.com/2015/09/10/the-top-...

Admin .. (if this is a late 2015 Repost then please delete..if repeat, *searched but I didnt see)
thx you.
DJ

If Dollar Bill isn't on the list then the list is incomplete

EnySpree wrote:If Dollar Bill isn't on the list then the list is incomplete

Fully agree,
Dunno how Sparrow ; Nate makes list and
Dollar Bill does not?

Plus Bradley had star college power..other folks on lists
Do not
Pros or NCAA

in this listing, bill is #5. marbs is ahead of lucas though, that aint right.

There's a lot of players with really ordinary #s like 8 pts, 5 rbs. In the top part of the list, it gives too much weight to volume scoring. It still was interesting to look through. It brought back many memories.
I almost had a heart attack when I saw this: "35. Amare Stoudemire, 2010-present"
That must be a typo.

so many marginal players

So many marginal posters..........

mreinman wrote:so many marginal players

Yeah, that's what I was getting at. I guess we haven't had enough success for a list that's more than 10 or so.

Besides the Celtics and Lakers, how many marginal are on other teams "top 50" lists? We dont' look at those.
Some where Steve Mix is on a sixers list.
Also, different era, not all were high scoring.

Including Louie Orr in anything Top-Knicks-related should immediately trigger that web site to be shut down.

Could not find the clip of him almost killing himself on the the front of the rim on a breakaway dunk.