Knicks · Free Agency Thread: Vertical is doing a live free agency show starting at 11:30 tonight (page 13)
Knickoftime@ 7/5/2016 1:49 PM
Cartman718 wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:Seth Curry is reportedly off the table. Mavs signed him. He was intriguing. Not sure why Phil passed on him. Not enough playmaking ability?
Because we got Brandon Jennings?
So if Rose is sitting a game out, who's gonna back up Jennings?
Someone not currently signed to a contract.
Could have been Seth. I wanna know why Phil didn't want him.
I wanna know how you know he didn't?
Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/nypost_berman/status/750178294860054528
He's obviously saying that Seth Curry is not as good as Steph Curry but who's arguing that. He's saying he's not worth the sign, which is fine. I just wanna know why Phil thought so
You don't know that he didn't. It was a throwaway joke by Berman based on the fact Knicks signed jennings and Curry signed elsewhere.
He isn'r reporting Jackson had no interest. How would be know that?
Cartman718@ 7/5/2016 1:57 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:Seth Curry is reportedly off the table. Mavs signed him. He was intriguing. Not sure why Phil passed on him. Not enough playmaking ability?
Because we got Brandon Jennings?
So if Rose is sitting a game out, who's gonna back up Jennings?
Someone not currently signed to a contract.
Could have been Seth. I wanna know why Phil didn't want him.
I wanna know how you know he didn't?
Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/nypost_berman/status/750178294860054528
He's obviously saying that Seth Curry is not as good as Steph Curry but who's arguing that. He's saying he's not worth the sign, which is fine. I just wanna know why Phil thought so
You don't know that he didn't. It was a throwaway joke by Berman based on the fact Knicks signed jennings and Curry signed elsewhere.
He isn'r reporting Jackson had no interest. How would be know that?
Lol isn't that his job to know what Knicks mgmt. all this b
Cartman718@ 7/5/2016 1:59 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:Seth Curry is reportedly off the table. Mavs signed him. He was intriguing. Not sure why Phil passed on him. Not enough playmaking ability?
Because we got Brandon Jennings?
So if Rose is sitting a game out, who's gonna back up Jennings?
Someone not currently signed to a contract.
Could have been Seth. I wanna know why Phil didn't want him.
I wanna know how you know he didn't?
Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/nypost_berman/status/750178294860054528
He's obviously saying that Seth Curry is not as good as Steph Curry but who's arguing that. He's saying he's not worth the sign, which is fine. I just wanna know why Phil thought so
You don't know that he didn't. It was a throwaway joke by Berman based on the fact Knicks signed jennings and Curry signed elsewhere.
He isn'r reporting Jackson had no interest. How would be know that?
Lol isn't that his job to know what Knicks mgmt are talking about like any other reporters
Knickoftime@ 7/5/2016 2:01 PM
Cartman718 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:Seth Curry is reportedly off the table. Mavs signed him. He was intriguing. Not sure why Phil passed on him. Not enough playmaking ability?
Because we got Brandon Jennings?
So if Rose is sitting a game out, who's gonna back up Jennings?
Someone not currently signed to a contract.
Could have been Seth. I wanna know why Phil didn't want him.
I wanna know how you know he didn't?
Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/nypost_berman/status/750178294860054528
He's obviously saying that Seth Curry is not as good as Steph Curry but who's arguing that. He's saying he's not worth the sign, which is fine. I just wanna know why Phil thought so
You don't know that he didn't. It was a throwaway joke by Berman based on the fact Knicks signed jennings and Curry signed elsewhere.
He isn'r reporting Jackson had no interest. How would be know that?
Lol isn't that his job to know what Knicks mgmt. all this b
Right, because Knicks management called him and told him they weren't interested in a random player with no connection with the team.
That's what happened.
crzymdups@ 7/5/2016 2:12 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:Seth Curry is reportedly off the table. Mavs signed him. He was intriguing. Not sure why Phil passed on him. Not enough playmaking ability?
Because we got Brandon Jennings?
So if Rose is sitting a game out, who's gonna back up Jennings?
Someone not currently signed to a contract.
Could have been Seth. I wanna know why Phil didn't want him.
I wanna know how you know he didn't?
Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/nypost_berman/status/750178294860054528
He's obviously saying that Seth Curry is not as good as Steph Curry but who's arguing that. He's saying he's not worth the sign, which is fine. I just wanna know why Phil thought so
You don't know that he didn't. It was a throwaway joke by Berman based on the fact Knicks signed jennings and Curry signed elsewhere.
He isn'r reporting Jackson had no interest. How would be know that?
Lol isn't that his job to know what Knicks mgmt. all this b
Right, because Knicks management called him and told him they weren't interested in a random player with no connection with the team.
That's what happened.
You do realize reporters have sources, right?
He stated in an earlier tweet that we has told the Knicks had no interest.
Obviously it doesn't matter all that much, but I don't think it's worth striking a crappy tone with someone here. Berman says he was told the Knicks weren't interested in Curry. That could be an agent, could be someone with the Knicks, any number of people could have knowledge that the Knicks didn't reach out to Seth Curry and then told Berman.
Not sure what the huffiness is about in this situation. Berman directly said this. So either he's lying for absolutely no reason... or someone told him the Knicks weren't interested in Seth Curry, as he said.
Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/NYPost_Berman/status/750172485686091776
Cartman718 wrote:Seth Curry is reportedly off the table. Mavs signed him. He was intriguing. Not sure why Phil passed on him. Not enough playmaking ability?
Because we got Brandon Jennings?
So if Rose is sitting a game out, who's gonna back up Jennings?
Someone not currently signed to a contract.
Could have been Seth. I wanna know why Phil didn't want him.
I wanna know how you know he didn't?
Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/nypost_berman/status/750178294860054528
He's obviously saying that Seth Curry is not as good as Steph Curry but who's arguing that. He's saying he's not worth the sign, which is fine. I just wanna know why Phil thought so
You don't know that he didn't. It was a throwaway joke by Berman based on the fact Knicks signed jennings and Curry signed elsewhere.
He isn'r reporting Jackson had no interest. How would be know that?
Lol isn't that his job to know what Knicks mgmt. all this b
Right, because Knicks management called him and told him they weren't interested in a random player with no connection with the team.
That's what happened.
You do realize reporters have sources, right?
He stated in an earlier tweet that we has told the Knicks had no interest.
Obviously it doesn't matter all that much, but I don't think it's worth striking a crappy tone with someone here. Berman says he was told the Knicks weren't interested in Curry. That could be an agent, could be someone with the Knicks, any number of people could have knowledge that the Knicks didn't reach out to Seth Curry and then told Berman.
Not sure what the huffiness is about in this situation. Berman directly said this. So either he's lying for absolutely no reason... or someone told him the Knicks weren't interested in Seth Curry, as he said.
Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/NYPost_Berman/status/750172485686091776
I do like the job Phil has done this offseason. Don't get me wrong. Knickoftime may not like me questioning lack of signing Seth Curry. Especially since he was available at such a low price.
But there were some moves I didn't completely agree with. Like the 4th year for Noah or the Lance Thomas salary or the Seth Curry lack of signing. Noah's signing can be considered "palatable" if we believe he truly was instrumental in the Courtney Lee signing but even there we didn't really get a deal. We got him at Arron afflalo's current price tag.
NYKBocker@ 7/5/2016 3:03 PM
Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://twitter.com/TheVertical/status/750356316900786176
