Like why?
He should have signed here. Doesn't say what he got as far as salary though. If it's the minimum then that's just ridiculous
I'd rather have David Lee honestly.
Scola probably got a pretty decent salary in Brooklyn and all we can offer is the minimum.
Scola will play in Brooklyn. Here, we would hope not.
EnySpree wrote:Like why?He should have signed here. Doesn't say what he got as far as salary though. If it's the minimum then that's just ridiculous
Probably looking for a starting spot. His only real competition is Booker.
NYKBocker wrote:EnySpree wrote:Like why?He should have signed here. Doesn't say what he got as far as salary though. If it's the minimum then that's just ridiculous
Probably looking for a starting spot. His only real competition is Booker.
I guess you can respect that. He wants to play. Their team is really young
EnySpree wrote:NYKBocker wrote:EnySpree wrote:Like why?He should have signed here. Doesn't say what he got as far as salary though. If it's the minimum then that's just ridiculous
Probably looking for a starting spot. His only real competition is Booker.
I guess you can respect that. He wants to play. Their team is really young
Maybe the Nets just offered him more $$ than the Knicks and other teams could pay him?
newyorker4ever wrote:crzymdups wrote:I'd rather have David Lee honestly. Scola probably got a pretty decent salary in Brooklyn and all we can offer is the minimum.
+1
David Lee, if willing to take a vets minimum like Sasha, would be a decent addition.
We could really use a big who has some defensive abilities, though.
He's old but can still play some. Would have fit a need here but.. hopefully we can find a younger piece that does the same. Guess Nets signed him to fill some time until their next attempts to sign young talent. Think their attempts to get Johnson and Crabbe made sense, signing players to longer terms that offer less upsides doesnt
