I'll take Rubio at his salary over the both of them. Teague will cost at least $20 million per annum.
Hey may not play a lot because he's an 18 year old rookie playing the toughest position to adjust to in the NBA.
But why is he "shakey"?
Stay away from Rose. Teague is a better shooter, defender, passer, and more durable. He fits better with our young pieces. Rose is basically on his own island out there. We don't need that.
Knickoftime wrote:Hey may not play a lot because he's an 18 year old rookie playing the toughest position to adjust to in the NBA. But why is he "shakey"?
Yeah i don't get the shaky comment. Is it just because he has a sore knee?
Besides that one hiccup Rose had, he's been a pretty good company man. I'd take him back at the right contract. Don't want to overpay which you'll have to for Teague.
Sinix wrote:Besides that one hiccup Rose had, he's been a pretty good company man. I'd take him back at the right contract. Don't want to overpay which you'll have to for Teague.
Quality of his company man-ism aside, I'd say his defense is the reason not to bring Rose back.
Don't need another.
Neither. Go for Holiday or Mills. I would prefer to go with Baker/Randle/nitlikina.
If you need a vet, give Collison a 1 year deal. The idea is to give the young players as much time as possible so they can better as soon as possible.
A deal for Rubio would be the best. I am for Lee for Rubio.
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:Neither. Go for Holiday or Mills. I would prefer to go with Baker/Randle/nitlikina. If you need a vet, give Collison a 1 year deal. The idea is to give the young players as much time as possible so they can better as soon as possible.
A deal for Rubio would be the best. I am for Lee for Rubio.
A better overpay is for George Young who is a pretty good 2-way player. At least over Rose and Teague. However I totally agree with Mills. He's the defensive team first guy we really need as part of a culture change. I would much rather overpay for Mills (say 3/$45mm) than Teague or Rose, both of whom are prob in the $20-$25mm range.
Honestly I'd rather go for rondo simply because I think you could get him on a one or two year deal, which tides us on until Frank is ready.
reub wrote:I'll take Rubio at his salary over the both of them. Teague will cost at least $20 million per annum.
Rubio would be by far the best option- short contract, great attitude and should have the Euro connection with all our young players. However I just don't see why this would swap Rubio for rose
rose said he will take a pay cut to resign with the knicks, and I don't care if the sal cap is 200 mill, there's no way on earth anyone will give either more than 15 per, but I think rose was willing to sign for like 13mill
knicks1248 wrote:rose said he will take a pay cut to resign with the knicks, and I don't care if the sal cap is 200 mill, there's no way on earth anyone will give either more than 15 per, but I think rose was willing to sign for like 13mill
13mill too much.
reub wrote:I'll take Rubio at his salary over the both of them. Teague will cost at least $20 million per annum.
This!
Can't answer the poll unless I know how much and how many years Teague is likely to get.
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:Neither. Go for Holiday or Mills. I would prefer to go with Baker/Randle/nitlikina. If you need a vet, give Collison a 1 year deal. The idea is to give the young players as much time as possible so they can better as soon as possible.
A deal for Rubio would be the best. I am for Lee for Rubio.
Just heard Holiday is off the table. Resigning with N.O.
smackeddog wrote:reub wrote:I'll take Rubio at his salary over the both of them. Teague will cost at least $20 million per annum.
Rubio would be by far the best option- short contract, great attitude and should have the Euro connection with all our young players. However I just don't see why this would swap Rubio for rose
Yeah, I was anti-Rubio a few months ago but he is looking better and better as time goes by.
fishmike wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:Neither. Go for Holiday or Mills. I would prefer to go with Baker/Randle/nitlikina. If you need a vet, give Collison a 1 year deal. The idea is to give the young players as much time as possible so they can better as soon as possible.
A deal for Rubio would be the best. I am for Lee for Rubio.
A better overpay is for George Young who is a pretty good 2-way player. At least over Rose and Teague. However I totally agree with Mills. He's the defensive team first guy we really need as part of a culture change. I would much rather overpay for Mills (say 3/$45mm) than Teague or Rose, both of whom are prob in the $20-$25mm range.
Agree with this line of thinking. We need to give minutes to Frank, not start the season assuming he can't play, which is typical Kincks approach
Forget Rose. He's a net negative and left Porzingis open so many times my head almost exploded. Plus he won't come cheap anyway and his injury history reads like a horror movie. I really can't stand him. He can't shoot or play D. I agree that I'd take Rubio any day even though he can't shoot either (actually he's probably a worse shooter).
H1AND1 wrote:Forget Rose. He's a net negative and left Porzingis open so many times my head almost exploded. Plus he won't come cheap anyway and his injury history reads like a horror movie. I really can't stand him. He can't shoot or play D. I agree that I'd take Rubio any day even though he can't shoot either (actually he's probably a worse shooter).
THIS! 
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:Neither. Go for Holiday or Mills. I would prefer to go with Baker/Randle/nitlikina. If you need a vet, give Collison a 1 year deal. The idea is to give the young players as much time as possible so they can better as soon as possible.
A deal for Rubio would be the best. I am for Lee for Rubio.
Holiday getting $170 from Pelicans...that is not a typo. $170 million for Jrue Holiday. WTF
I'll take
