Knicks · Nets are getting Crabbe (page 1)

CrushAlot @ 7/25/2017 2:38 PM
Not sure if this as anything to do with N upcoming Melo deal.
NYKBocker @ 7/25/2017 2:49 PM
So they finally get their man. Crabbe owes the Nets for that huge contract. I wonder if this means that Lin is a goner.
smackeddog @ 7/25/2017 2:51 PM
I laugh at how the media said Tim Jr's contract was the worst of the off season and a huge overpay and how stupid we are, but they now say the nets acquiring Crabbe (worse player and higher contract) is a genius move.
CrushAlot @ 7/25/2017 2:52 PM
NYKBocker wrote:So they finally get their man. Crabbe owes the Nets for that huge contract. I wonder if this means that Lin is a goner.

The coach loves Lin. But he might bring something back that fits better with their timeline.
CrushAlot @ 7/25/2017 2:52 PM
martin @ 7/25/2017 2:52 PM
NYKBocker wrote:So they finally get their man. Crabbe owes the Nets for that huge contract. I wonder if this means that Lin is a goner.

Why would Lin be a goner?

fitzfarm @ 7/25/2017 2:53 PM
CrushAlot wrote:Not sure if this as anything to do with N upcoming Melo deal.

lol right when you think the knicks are like the jets, the nets always make me feel better.

crabbe is a awful player lol i can't believe this guy makes more then THJR.

smackeddog @ 7/25/2017 2:55 PM
Blazers have to have something else up their sleave, otherwise it's not great- they matched the contract last year, then ended up moving him for no assets and having to stretch the player they got back leaving a $3mil audience ear cap hit for 7 years
CrushAlot @ 7/25/2017 2:56 PM
smackeddog wrote:I laugh at how the media said Tim Jr's contract was the worst of the off season and a huge overpay and how stupid we are, but they now say the nets acquiring Crabbe (worse player and higher contract) is a genius move.

It definitely is biased coverage. The Knicks would be scorched if they made a trade like the Lakers did for Russell. The Nets dd move Nicholson's contact and Crabbe waived his trade kicker so this wasn't a horrible move for the nets. I like both Hardaway and Crabe as moves where a gm saw a guy he wanted and went and got him.
smackeddog @ 7/25/2017 2:57 PM
Ha ha, case point:

martin @ 7/25/2017 2:59 PM
smackeddog wrote:Blazers have to have something else up their sleave, otherwise it's not great- they matched the contract last year, then ended up moving him for no assets and having to stretch the player they got back leaving a $3mil audience ear cap hit for 7 years

NYKBocker @ 7/25/2017 3:02 PM
martin wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:So they finally get their man. Crabbe owes the Nets for that huge contract. I wonder if this means that Lin is a goner.

Why would Lin be a goner?


They need more parts and now they have 3 guards in Lin, Russell and Crabbe. Russell and Crabbe are big gets and Lin can bring them back a good player in another position.

I know I am going to get roasted for this but a trade for Lin and Whitehead for Lance Thomas and KOQ would benefit both teams. Lin can be the PG that can mentor Frank.

fitzfarm @ 7/25/2017 3:02 PM
smackeddog wrote:Ha ha, case point:

lol yea the knicks are awful to pay a better player in THJR less money then crabbe, but what a amazing move by the nets lol crabbe is a terrible player he is the definition of a one trick pony.

arkrud @ 7/25/2017 3:10 PM
NYKBocker wrote:
martin wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:So they finally get their man. Crabbe owes the Nets for that huge contract. I wonder if this means that Lin is a goner.

Why would Lin be a goner?


They need more parts and now they have 3 guards in Lin, Russell and Crabbe. Russell and Crabbe are big gets and Lin can bring them back a good player in another position.

I know I am going to get roasted for this but a trade for Lin and Whitehead for Lance Thomas and KOQ would benefit both teams. Lin can be the PG that can mentor Frank.

If Melo is gone this can be a possibility.
Some Lin haters will have a heart-attack

GoNyGoNyGo @ 7/25/2017 3:10 PM
This could be the precursor to a potential trade involving Melo, Houston and Portland. Who knows how it will shake out but perhaps this is the beginning.

The suspense is killing me!

Knickoftime @ 7/25/2017 3:12 PM
smackeddog wrote:Blazers have to have something else up their sleave, otherwise it's not great- they matched the contract last year, then ended up moving him for no assets and having to stretch the player they got back leaving a $3mil audience ear cap hit for 7 years

"Portland will see their current luxury tax bill drop from $48.3M to $4.4M"

$44m ... a year ... in their pockets isn't great?

smackeddog @ 7/25/2017 3:24 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Blazers have to have something else up their sleave, otherwise it's not great- they matched the contract last year, then ended up moving him for no assets and having to stretch the player they got back leaving a $3mil audience ear cap hit for 7 years

"Portland will see their current luxury tax bill drop from $48.3M to $4.4M"

$44m ... a year ... in their pockets isn't great?

My point is they could have accomplished that by not matching last offseason- now they have an extra $3mil for no gain. Unless they pull off a melo related deal with the rockets

martin @ 7/25/2017 3:25 PM
smackeddog wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Blazers have to have something else up their sleave, otherwise it's not great- they matched the contract last year, then ended up moving him for no assets and having to stretch the player they got back leaving a $3mil audience ear cap hit for 7 years

"Portland will see their current luxury tax bill drop from $48.3M to $4.4M"

$44m ... a year ... in their pockets isn't great?

My point is they could have accomplished that by not matching last offseason- now they have an extra $3mil for no gain. Unless they pull off a melo related deal with the rockets

So the net is they just swallowed a mistake for $21M?

EnySpree @ 7/25/2017 3:26 PM
How many shooting guards and small fwds do the Nets need?
MS @ 7/25/2017 3:31 PM
Wow not one draft pick. That's embarrassing.

He is a bench player and they just took on that contract. I guess they will do anything to save the embarrassment of handing over another 1 pick.

Knickoftime @ 7/25/2017 3:31 PM
smackeddog wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Blazers have to have something else up their sleave, otherwise it's not great- they matched the contract last year, then ended up moving him for no assets and having to stretch the player they got back leaving a $3mil audience ear cap hit for 7 years

"Portland will see their current luxury tax bill drop from $48.3M to $4.4M"

$44m ... a year ... in their pockets isn't great?

My point is they could have accomplished that by not matching last offseason- now they have an extra $3mil for no gain. Unless they pull off a melo related deal with the rockets

No, they made a terrible 2016 deal.

But a great 2017 one.

Page 1 of 3