he had a good stretch before getting hurt. Looked well worth the $$.
Moving forward he must become consistent! Just liek KP and the team. Harden is good almost every night...same with all the great ones.
He has the skills and desire...needs the mental...should see sports psychologist.
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:he had a good stretch before getting hurt. Looked well worth the $$.
Moving forward he must become consistent! Just liek KP and the team. Harden is good almost every night...same with all the great ones.
He has the skills and desire...needs the mental...should see sports psychologist.
tHJ has been up and down his entire career..I remember watching him in the NCAA tourney, lights out in the first 2 rounds, was horrible in the elite 8 and final 4..
GoNyGoNyGo wrote:he had a good stretch before getting hurt. Looked well worth the $$.
Moving forward he must become consistent! Just liek KP and the team. Harden is good almost every night...same with all the great ones.
He has the skills and desire...needs the mental...should see sports psychologist.
That's the problem....you are putting him in a class where he doesn't belong.
THjr. he is more in the Matthews, Crabbe, Fournier, Bazemore group
Anybody else trying very hard not to remember Chuck Knoblauch? Worst case scenario yes, but damn, Timmy's shooting numbers are reminiscent of a guy who couldn't get out of his own head.
I've never seen such a thing in the nba before- a streaky player who goes through a cold spell! I wonder how some of you survived John Starks...
It's a cold spell only if it isn't the norm. It's more accurate to say to my was on a hit streak when he was shooting respectably.
I think his best position going forward next year is 6th man. If hes hot let him stay in--if not bench him
A 70 million dollar 6th Man. Looks like that could be the going rate anyway, although right now, we're paying him Paul George money...
BRIGGS wrote:I think his best position going forward next year is 6th man. If hes hot let him stay in--if not bench him
Yes, plus his defense is barely average (at best). I'm a long proponent for THJr off the bench on a mature Knicks team.
jrodmc wrote:A 70 million dollar 6th Man. Looks like that could be the going rate anyway, although right now, we're paying him Paul George money...
Welcome to the cba, it’s likely the only way you can get a restricted FA. I’d rather pay restricted FAs like Tim Jr that kind of money, than blow it on old vets like Noah.
Under this cba you use the draft to acquire your franchise level talent and you use free agency for your role players and sixth men
Hardaway lighting it up tonight.
This is what happens. Can't judge guys game by game. Hardaway will win games and lose games with his shooting. Just need to deal with it. Dude is lighting it up like it's no ones business. He can win games singlehandedly with this type of stuff. That matters when we are a fringe playoff team and healthy.
SupremeCommander wrote:he's having a brutal 3rd
It's one thing to declare this a bad contract based on a bad stretch of a handful of games, but are we really going to start breaking him down by quarter too?
Knixkik wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:he's having a brutal 3rd
It's one thing to declare this a bad contract based on a bad stretch of a handful of games, but are we really going to start breaking him down by quarter too?
So I guess you take away that first q and he's on I e heckuva bad stretch. He was back to clank in the 2 nd half.
Wtf wa that clank????? Gave it away and gave up on the play??? He killed all the good flow in the 2 nd half
Knixkik wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:he's having a brutal 3rd
It's one thing to declare this a bad contract based on a bad stretch of a handful of games, but are we really going to start breaking him down by quarter too?
he's had one good half over the past eight games. am I the one evaluating off a small sample size or are you?
SupremeCommander wrote:Knixkik wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:he's having a brutal 3rd
It's one thing to declare this a bad contract based on a bad stretch of a handful of games, but are we really going to start breaking him down by quarter too?
he's had one good half over the past eight games. am I the one evaluating off a small sample size or are you?
I will judge him on the season.
When it mattered, two bonehead turnovers.
Knixkik wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:Knixkik wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:he's having a brutal 3rd
It's one thing to declare this a bad contract based on a bad stretch of a handful of games, but are we really going to start breaking him down by quarter too?
he's had one good half over the past eight games. am I the one evaluating off a small sample size or are you?
I will judge him on the season.
nice backpedal
Knixkik wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:Knixkik wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:he's having a brutal 3rd
It's one thing to declare this a bad contract based on a bad stretch of a handful of games, but are we really going to start breaking him down by quarter too?
he's had one good half over the past eight games. am I the one evaluating off a small sample size or are you?
I will judge him on the season.
40 % fg and 30 % 3pt. Mediocre D, nothing special on rebounds and assists.
