How does this play out? Is it a coin flip, based on their play against one another ? 8th could be nice and increases the possibility of getting in top 3 considerably.
I think bulls have tiebreaker
ekstarks94 wrote:I think bulls have tiebreaker
Bulls have won 3/4 against the knicks.
In case of a tie the ping pong balls are split evenly. They do do a coin flip to determine the default order in the case that neither team jumps up in the lottery.
Head to head does not matter.
why would any knick fan want pick 8, when that spot has a history of producing marginal NBA talent
knicks1248 wrote:why would any knick fan want pick 8, when that spot has a history of producing marginal NBA talent
As opposed to pick #9? Are you asking this seriously?
martin wrote:knicks1248 wrote:why would any knick fan want pick 8, when that spot has a history of producing marginal NBA talent
As opposed to pick #9? Are you asking this seriously?
in the last 10 yrs the #9 has produce (to name a few) derozen, Drummond, kemba, burke, Gordon haywood noah
while the #8 pick hasn't produce a single all star in over 10+ yrs.
Yes I'm very serious
THank you for the additional Signature fodder.
Can't make this shyt up.
knicks1248 wrote:martin wrote:knicks1248 wrote:why would any knick fan want pick 8, when that spot has a history of producing marginal NBA talent
As opposed to pick #9? Are you asking this seriously?
in the last 10 yrs the #9 has produce (to name a few) derozen, Drummond, kemba, burke, Gordon haywood noah
while the #8 pick hasn't produce a single all star in over 10+ yrs.
Yes I'm very serious
I don't know what to add here but your reasoning is off
martin wrote:knicks1248 wrote:martin wrote:knicks1248 wrote:why would any knick fan want pick 8, when that spot has a history of producing marginal NBA talent
As opposed to pick #9? Are you asking this seriously?
in the last 10 yrs the #9 has produce (to name a few) derozen, Drummond, kemba, burke, Gordon haywood noah
while the #8 pick hasn't produce a single all star in over 10+ yrs.
Yes I'm very serious
I don't know what to add here but your reasoning is off
Your the moderater, you are kind.
Your speechless. There are not words that are kind.
But im not. Its just flat out dumb.
Nalod wrote:martin wrote:knicks1248 wrote:martin wrote:knicks1248 wrote:why would any knick fan want pick 8, when that spot has a history of producing marginal NBA talent
As opposed to pick #9? Are you asking this seriously?
in the last 10 yrs the #9 has produce (to name a few) derozen, Drummond, kemba, burke, Gordon haywood noah
while the #8 pick hasn't produce a single all star in over 10+ yrs.
Yes I'm very serious
I don't know what to add here but your reasoning is off
Your the moderater, you are kind.
Your speechless. There are not words that are kind.
But im not. Its just flat out dumb.
pretty much what I was gonna initially write
martin wrote:Nalod wrote:martin wrote:knicks1248 wrote:martin wrote:knicks1248 wrote:why would any knick fan want pick 8, when that spot has a history of producing marginal NBA talent
As opposed to pick #9? Are you asking this seriously?
in the last 10 yrs the #9 has produce (to name a few) derozen, Drummond, kemba, burke, Gordon haywood noah
while the #8 pick hasn't produce a single all star in over 10+ yrs.
Yes I'm very serious
I don't know what to add here but your reasoning is off
Your the moderater, you are kind.
Your speechless. There are not words that are kind.
But im not. Its just flat out dumb.
pretty much what I was gonna initially write
Yes, but we are here to protect your neutral stance.
knicks1248 wrote:martin wrote:knicks1248 wrote:why would any knick fan want pick 8, when that spot has a history of producing marginal NBA talent
As opposed to pick #9? Are you asking this seriously?
in the last 10 yrs the #9 has produce (to name a few) derozen, Drummond, kemba, burke, Gordon haywood noah
while the #8 pick hasn't produce a single all star in over 10+ yrs.
Yes I'm very serious
Doesn't work like this, bro...
You are basically saying that one draft slot has some kind of magic predictive power...It just doesn't work like that.
Apart from being able to have a greater choice, the issue is # 8 carries with it - a significantly higher possibility of entering the top 3.
Paris907 wrote:Apart from being able to have a greater choice, the issue is # 8 carries with it - a significantly higher possibility of entering the top 3.
Which in itself is ridiculous the weighting is all messed up and doesn't take into account win totals. Should a 22 win team really have a 40% better chance at the top 3 than a 27 win team, is there that much of a talent gap?
martin wrote:I don't know what to add here but your reasoning is off
I believe they call it superstition.
