No need to move up. With Doncic, Ayton, Jackson, Bagley, Bamba, Young, Carter, Porter, and Bridges being the top 9, just take the guy who is left at #9. It's all preference at this point where these guys rank, none in that 6-9 range are rated particularly higher than the other.
Knixkik wrote:No need to move up. With Doncic, Ayton, Jackson, Bagley, Bamba, Young, Carter, Porter, and Bridges being the top 9, just take the guy who is left at #9. It's all preference at this point where these guys rank, none in that 6-9 range are rated particularly higher than the other.
I would not take Young.. but I am probably in the minority here. Otherwise I agree... totally. Do your homework and take who you like at 9
fishmike wrote:Knixkik wrote:No need to move up. With Doncic, Ayton, Jackson, Bagley, Bamba, Young, Carter, Porter, and Bridges being the top 9, just take the guy who is left at #9. It's all preference at this point where these guys rank, none in that 6-9 range are rated particularly higher than the other.
I would not take Young.. but I am probably in the minority here. Otherwise I agree... totally. Do your homework and take who you like at 9
i agree fish. Preferably i want one of those forwards but if we had to choose a guard i would choose sexton because he is a two way player
Posted this tweet on the draft thread, too...
Though I had heard the reports were OK...now you see something like this.
Can we assume that the Knicks were one of the teams which examined him in some way...or at least saw a detailed medical report on him?
[Tweet]https://twitter.com/GoodmanHoops/status/1009430720035639296[/tweet]
Players like Porter belong in a separate draft category altogether; Schroedinger's Draft - a free extra pick any team can make on a player who may or may not be a player after you sign the contract.
