Knicks · Frank haters can suck it (page 45)

fwk00 @ 5/15/2022 9:02 PM
Panos wrote:I don't think the point was ever that he couldn't play defense. It was that he was thoroughly ineffective on the other side of the ball in any kind of role. His playmaking was so bad people wanted him in as a SF. Which he's not. He doesn't have any reliable offensive facet to his game.

Looks like phx has no reliable offense.

blkexec @ 5/15/2022 9:12 PM
Where’s the bullock thread when you need one. Give that man his flowers now. Y’all see his defense on booker? And guess what, it’s during the playoffs.
ToddTT @ 5/15/2022 9:37 PM
blkexec wrote:Where’s the bullock thread when you need one. Give that man his flowers now. Y’all see his defense on booker? And guess what, it’s during the playoffs.

Bullock had the impossible task of guarding Trae without being able to breathe on him.

Losing Bullock sucked.

fwk00 @ 5/15/2022 10:38 PM
Hardaway, Bullock, and Frankie are getting rings this year.
jskinny35 @ 5/15/2022 10:50 PM
fwk00 wrote:Hardaway, Bullock, and Frankie are getting rings this year.

If Mavs win you have to also add Trey Burke and Theo Pinson. That's a compiled starting Knicks lineup from the past few years... Just glad they didn't keep KP there or it would sting even more. Go Warriors!

Jmpasq @ 5/16/2022 6:29 AM
jskinny35 wrote:
fwk00 wrote:Hardaway, Bullock, and Frankie are getting rings this year.

If Mavs win you have to also add Trey Burke and Theo Pinson. That's a compiled starting Knicks lineup from the past few years... Just glad they didn't keep KP there or it would sting even more. Go Warriors!

If they had KP they would of lost.

Vmart @ 5/16/2022 8:01 AM
jskinny35 wrote:
fwk00 wrote:Hardaway, Bullock, and Frankie are getting rings this year.

If Mavs win you have to also add Trey Burke and Theo Pinson. That's a compiled starting Knicks lineup from the past few years... Just glad they didn't keep KP there or it would sting even more. Go Warriors!

Why would you not want our past guys to win? The Knicks didn’t believe in them and didn’t trust them to be long term piece. That’s not in the players. This is the second team the Knicks have helped win in the playoffs. There was the Cleveland Knicks and now Dallas Knicks.

Marv @ 5/16/2022 8:21 AM
Vmart wrote:
jskinny35 wrote:
fwk00 wrote:Hardaway, Bullock, and Frankie are getting rings this year.

If Mavs win you have to also add Trey Burke and Theo Pinson. That's a compiled starting Knicks lineup from the past few years... Just glad they didn't keep KP there or it would sting even more. Go Warriors!

Why would you not want our past guys to win? The Knicks didn’t believe in them and didn’t trust them to be long term piece. That’s not in the players. This is the second team the Knicks have helped win in the playoffs. There was the Cleveland Knicks and now Dallas Knicks.

dallas hasn't exactly won a ring yet.

and there isn't a single one of those guys i'd want back. except theo of course

martin @ 5/16/2022 8:24 AM
I think Frank has solidified his role in the NBA: Not a full time rotational player but a minimum wage, 14-15th roster slot type who does spot isolation defensive work against wings. This is what he is good for, if healthy
BigDaddyG @ 5/16/2022 8:28 AM
Marv wrote:
Vmart wrote:
jskinny35 wrote:
fwk00 wrote:Hardaway, Bullock, and Frankie are getting rings this year.

If Mavs win you have to also add Trey Burke and Theo Pinson. That's a compiled starting Knicks lineup from the past few years... Just glad they didn't keep KP there or it would sting even more. Go Warriors!

Why would you not want our past guys to win? The Knicks didn’t believe in them and didn’t trust them to be long term piece. That’s not in the players. This is the second team the Knicks have helped win in the playoffs. There was the Cleveland Knicks and now Dallas Knicks.

dallas hasn't exactly won a ring yet.

and there isn't a single one of those guys i'd want back. except theo of course

I wouldn't mind Reggie in a bench role. Fun fact, Brunson shot a higher fg percentage from 2 point range than KP for the Mavericks this year.

franco12 @ 5/16/2022 8:39 AM
BigDaddyG wrote:
Marv wrote:
Vmart wrote:
jskinny35 wrote:
fwk00 wrote:Hardaway, Bullock, and Frankie are getting rings this year.

If Mavs win you have to also add Trey Burke and Theo Pinson. That's a compiled starting Knicks lineup from the past few years... Just glad they didn't keep KP there or it would sting even more. Go Warriors!

Why would you not want our past guys to win? The Knicks didn’t believe in them and didn’t trust them to be long term piece. That’s not in the players. This is the second team the Knicks have helped win in the playoffs. There was the Cleveland Knicks and now Dallas Knicks.

dallas hasn't exactly won a ring yet.

and there isn't a single one of those guys i'd want back. except theo of course

I wouldn't mind Reggie in a bench role. Fun fact, Brunson shot a higher fg percentage from 2 point range than KP for the Mavericks this year.

all those stupid fade aways he takes over guys a foot shorter than him when he posts up.

Vmart @ 5/16/2022 9:14 AM
Marv wrote:
Vmart wrote:
jskinny35 wrote:
fwk00 wrote:Hardaway, Bullock, and Frankie are getting rings this year.

If Mavs win you have to also add Trey Burke and Theo Pinson. That's a compiled starting Knicks lineup from the past few years... Just glad they didn't keep KP there or it would sting even more. Go Warriors!

Why would you not want our past guys to win? The Knicks didn’t believe in them and didn’t trust them to be long term piece. That’s not in the players. This is the second team the Knicks have helped win in the playoffs. There was the Cleveland Knicks and now Dallas Knicks.

dallas hasn't exactly won a ring yet.

and there isn't a single one of those guys i'd want back. except theo of course

I said helped win in the playoffs. No mention of ring.

HofstraBBall @ 5/16/2022 12:05 PM
Vmart wrote:
Marv wrote:
Vmart wrote:
jskinny35 wrote:
fwk00 wrote:Hardaway, Bullock, and Frankie are getting rings this year.

If Mavs win you have to also add Trey Burke and Theo Pinson. That's a compiled starting Knicks lineup from the past few years... Just glad they didn't keep KP there or it would sting even more. Go Warriors!

Why would you not want our past guys to win? The Knicks didn’t believe in them and didn’t trust them to be long term piece. That’s not in the players. This is the second team the Knicks have helped win in the playoffs. There was the Cleveland Knicks and now Dallas Knicks.

dallas hasn't exactly won a ring yet.

and there isn't a single one of those guys i'd want back. except theo of course

I said helped win in the playoffs. No mention of ring.

So all we need is Luka?

jrodmc @ 5/16/2022 12:24 PM
Jmpasq wrote:
jskinny35 wrote:
fwk00 wrote:Hardaway, Bullock, and Frankie are getting rings this year.

If Mavs win you have to also add Trey Burke and Theo Pinson. That's a compiled starting Knicks lineup from the past few years... Just glad they didn't keep KP there or it would sting even more. Go Warriors!

If they had KP they would of lost.

If they had kept KP they would have not made the playoffs. Washington probably would have, though.

jrodmc @ 5/16/2022 12:25 PM
HofstraBBall wrote:
Vmart wrote:
Marv wrote:
Vmart wrote:
jskinny35 wrote:
fwk00 wrote:Hardaway, Bullock, and Frankie are getting rings this year.

If Mavs win you have to also add Trey Burke and Theo Pinson. That's a compiled starting Knicks lineup from the past few years... Just glad they didn't keep KP there or it would sting even more. Go Warriors!

Why would you not want our past guys to win? The Knicks didn’t believe in them and didn’t trust them to be long term piece. That’s not in the players. This is the second team the Knicks have helped win in the playoffs. There was the Cleveland Knicks and now Dallas Knicks.

dallas hasn't exactly won a ring yet.

and there isn't a single one of those guys i'd want back. except theo of course

I said helped win in the playoffs. No mention of ring.

So all we need is Luka?

Yeah, and all the Cleveland Knicks needed was some flopper named LeQ.

fwk00 @ 5/16/2022 12:29 PM
HofstraBBall wrote:
Vmart wrote:
Marv wrote:
Vmart wrote:
jskinny35 wrote:
fwk00 wrote:Hardaway, Bullock, and Frankie are getting rings this year.

If Mavs win you have to also add Trey Burke and Theo Pinson. That's a compiled starting Knicks lineup from the past few years... Just glad they didn't keep KP there or it would sting even more. Go Warriors!

Why would you not want our past guys to win? The Knicks didn’t believe in them and didn’t trust them to be long term piece. That’s not in the players. This is the second team the Knicks have helped win in the playoffs. There was the Cleveland Knicks and now Dallas Knicks.

dallas hasn't exactly won a ring yet.

and there isn't a single one of those guys i'd want back. except theo of course

I said helped win in the playoffs. No mention of ring.

So all we need is Luka?

Well it looks like the magic team building formula has changed. Don't need no stinkin' "big three". One consistent euro and five ex-knicks and you're good to go.

Lebron is next year's CP3 sad sack.

Vmart @ 5/16/2022 6:36 PM
HofstraBBall wrote:
Vmart wrote:
Marv wrote:
Vmart wrote:
jskinny35 wrote:
fwk00 wrote:Hardaway, Bullock, and Frankie are getting rings this year.

If Mavs win you have to also add Trey Burke and Theo Pinson. That's a compiled starting Knicks lineup from the past few years... Just glad they didn't keep KP there or it would sting even more. Go Warriors!

Why would you not want our past guys to win? The Knicks didn’t believe in them and didn’t trust them to be long term piece. That’s not in the players. This is the second team the Knicks have helped win in the playoffs. There was the Cleveland Knicks and now Dallas Knicks.

dallas hasn't exactly won a ring yet.

and there isn't a single one of those guys i'd want back. except theo of course

I said helped win in the playoffs. No mention of ring.

So all we need is Luka?

We made the playoffs last year. We needed to be patient.

fishmike @ 5/17/2022 8:59 AM
martin wrote:I think Frank has solidified his role in the NBA: Not a full time rotational player but a minimum wage, 14-15th roster slot type who does spot isolation defensive work against wings. This is what he is good for, if healthy
he's good at that... always way. Still have to hide him on offense. Dude played 10mpg, over 7 games he had 12 points, 13 fouls and 6 TOs while shooting 36%

He's 23... if he can become a marginal offensive player he will be in the NBA for a long time. At this point I expect him to have Patty Mills type career

Of Mitchell/Monk/Frank/Smith only Donovan turned out to be worth the pick. Lottery luck is tough sometimes

Vmart @ 5/17/2022 9:15 AM
fishmike wrote:
martin wrote:I think Frank has solidified his role in the NBA: Not a full time rotational player but a minimum wage, 14-15th roster slot type who does spot isolation defensive work against wings. This is what he is good for, if healthy
he's good at that... always way. Still have to hide him on offense. Dude played 10mpg, over 7 games he had 12 points, 13 fouls and 6 TOs while shooting 36%

He's 23... if he can become a marginal offensive player he will be in the NBA for a long time. At this point I expect him to have Patty Mills type career

Of Mitchell/Monk/Frank/Smith only Donovan turned out to be worth the pick. Lottery luck is tough sometimes

Just imagine Mitchell if drafted by the Knicks. He would have turned out as a role player.

jrodmc @ 5/17/2022 9:26 AM
fishmike wrote:
martin wrote:I think Frank has solidified his role in the NBA: Not a full time rotational player but a minimum wage, 14-15th roster slot type who does spot isolation defensive work against wings. This is what he is good for, if healthy
he's good at that... always way. Still have to hide him on offense. Dude played 10mpg, over 7 games he had 12 points, 13 fouls and 6 TOs while shooting 36%

He's 23... if he can become a marginal offensive player he will be in the NBA for a long time. At this point I expect him to have Patty Mills type career

Of Mitchell/Monk/Frank/Smith only Donovan turned out to be worth the pick. Lottery luck is tough sometimes

So Frankie can play 12 minutes of stellar defense and the Mavs lose by 30.
Or Frankie can play 12 minutes of stellar defense and the Mavs win by 30.

Either way, Frankie wins!
If for no other reason, Frankie's sheer existence validates the possible true net-worthlessness of a Brunson.

And there is no such thing as luck.

fishmike @ 5/17/2022 10:46 AM
Vmart wrote:
fishmike wrote:
martin wrote:I think Frank has solidified his role in the NBA: Not a full time rotational player but a minimum wage, 14-15th roster slot type who does spot isolation defensive work against wings. This is what he is good for, if healthy
he's good at that... always way. Still have to hide him on offense. Dude played 10mpg, over 7 games he had 12 points, 13 fouls and 6 TOs while shooting 36%

He's 23... if he can become a marginal offensive player he will be in the NBA for a long time. At this point I expect him to have Patty Mills type career

Of Mitchell/Monk/Frank/Smith only Donovan turned out to be worth the pick. Lottery luck is tough sometimes

Just imagine Mitchell if drafted by the Knicks. He would have turned out as a role player.

ray of phucking sunshine
Page 45 of 48