He looked pretty solid in that last game and filled up the box stats in his 19 minutes.
I think he's a solid back up, but there hasn't been much talks about his status.
knicks1248 wrote:He looked pretty solid in that last game and filled up the box stats in his 19 minutes.I think he's a solid back up, but there hasn't been much talks about his status.
Question, did anybody NOT look good in the last game?
Welpee wrote:knicks1248 wrote:He looked pretty solid in that last game and filled up the box stats in his 19 minutes.I think he's a solid back up, but there hasn't been much talks about his status.
Question, did anybody NOT look good in the last game?
Good point
But does that mean we can't judge anyone that played in that game
knicks1248 wrote:He looked pretty solid in that last game and filled up the box stats in his 19 minutes.I think he's a solid back up, but there hasn't been much talks about his status.
Looks at Rainman too scared to post cuz he knows we jump his lazy ass fictitious shit!
So you taking everyone’s tempeture so. You don’t look stupid now?
As mentioned, everyone looked good vs. cav’s. I did not watch him defend or move without th ball. He can shoot! Thats never been an issue. Question is defensive liability.
Nalod wrote:knicks1248 wrote:He looked pretty solid in that last game and filled up the box stats in his 19 minutes.I think he's a solid back up, but there hasn't been much talks about his status.
Looks at Rainman too scared to post cuz he knows we jump his lazy ass fictitious shit!
So you taking everyone’s tempeture so. You don’t look stupid now?
As mentioned, everyone looked good vs. cav’s. I did not watch him defend or move without th ball. He can shoot! Thats never been an issue. Question is defensive liability.
I pretty much have you on ignore, and barely read any of your response or post just so you know.
knicks1248 wrote:Welpee wrote:knicks1248 wrote:He looked pretty solid in that last game and filled up the box stats in his 19 minutes.I think he's a solid back up, but there hasn't been much talks about his status.
Question, did anybody NOT look good in the last game?
Good point
But does that mean we can't judge anyone that played in that game
That's why as much as I want to get excited about Quickley, I'm trying to temper my enthusiasm. The Cavs are horrible even at full strength, much less with half their roster not playing. So to me, yeah, you kinda can't judge anyone based on that game. Especially when we were up for 40+. That alone is a pretty good clue about the opposition.
knicks1248 wrote:Nalod wrote:knicks1248 wrote:He looked pretty solid in that last game and filled up the box stats in his 19 minutes.I think he's a solid back up, but there hasn't been much talks about his status.
Looks at Rainman too scared to post cuz he knows we jump his lazy ass fictitious shit!
So you taking everyone’s tempeture so. You don’t look stupid now?
As mentioned, everyone looked good vs. cav’s. I did not watch him defend or move without th ball. He can shoot! Thats never been an issue. Question is defensive liability.
I pretty much have you on ignore, and barely read any of your response or post just so you know.
You pretty much have everything you read on ignore.
