Alpha1971 wrote:martin wrote:What kind of faux Knicks inspired leopard print is Rebecca wearing?
What's Mc Nutt wearing
Thats the right question to be asking.
Whine all you want you whining bastards but we have the best record in the first 28 since 2017.
Thibs hopefully stays away from Randle Iso. Not like we were not scoring all game without it.
Randle 31/13/7
JB 30/7
RJ 22 and 57% from 3pt
Clean wrote:Alpha1971 wrote:martin wrote:What kind of faux Knicks inspired leopard print is Rebecca wearing?
What's Mc Nutt wearing
Thats the right question to be asking.
Girl fills out her jeans.
Dang, Knicks fans are probably confused by this streak lol
HofstraBBall wrote:Too bad Clean missed the end of the game and overtime. Best Knick win ever. Lol
Lol
What a clutch win by the Knicks. Knicks were poised through out the game and got a well deserved win. Standout performances by everyone. They got to bring the same effort next game. Two wins here in Chicago by the Knicks could really shake things up for the Bulls. Especially with recent winning streaks by Houston and Orlando, Bulls now could still tank for Wembanyama.
GustavBahler wrote:Brunson got us through OT. Grimes is finding his stroke.I shouldnt want to see Randle traded after putting up numbers like he just did. But I do. Still closes games like he's throwing them. WTF was holding the ball for the entire shot clock, and going one on 3 to close regulation?
This is the kind of stuff that will kill a playoff run. And Randle does it way too much.
The thing is you have to mix things up. Have some motion. If it is just plain ISO for the whole second half it won't work vs good teams. I would not mind much if they did others things first then ended with ISO Randle or at least disguise the ISO Randle with movement beforehand to get him in good position or to catch teams off guard.
HofstraBBall wrote:Whine all you want you whining bastards but we have the best record in the first 28 since 2017. Thibs hopefully stays away from Randle Iso. Not like we were not scoring all game without it.
Randle 31/13/7
JB 30/7
RJ 22 and 57% from 3pt
Team has shot dreadfully from 3 all year, imagine if the numbers come up to league average for RJ and the others ? Not calling for 35 percent just 33 cause man lots our shooters stink so far
BigRedDog wrote:Can't anyone set picks? Just one on one offense
I read your posts - every single one negative, complaining whining. Knicks pull out a tough one on the road in OT and then you have nothing to say. Amazing.
HofstraBBall wrote:Whine all you want you whining bastards but we have the best record in the first 28 since 2017. Thibs hopefully stays away from Randle Iso. Not like we were not scoring all game without it.
Randle 31/13/7
JB 30/7
RJ 22 and 57% from 3pt
I don’t know if Thibs said “Randle do iso 10 times in a row including a 24 second violation to end the regulation” or Randle just chose to do it but I’m still fire Thibs and trade Randle.
It was a good win but it doesn’t change how I feel about those two. We’ve seen this before and we’ve seen the wheels fall off of this before too.
What was the tech for at the end. I couldn’t make it out.
KnickDanger wrote:BigRedDog wrote:Can't anyone set picks? Just one on one offense
I read your posts - every single one negative, complaining whining. Knicks pull out a tough one on the road in OT and then you have nothing to say. Amazing.
Is it negative if it is the truth? Until I stopped watching every single play was ISO Randle. I guess you can't really call it one on one when we all know the double is coming once his back is turned.
GustavBahler wrote:Brunson got us through OT. Grimes is finding his stroke.I shouldnt want to see Randle traded after putting up numbers like he just did. But I do. Still closes games like he's throwing them. WTF was holding the ball for the entire shot clock, and going one on 3 to close regulation?
This is the kind of stuff that will kill a playoff run. And Randle does it way too much.
You must not have watched the game. Williams was the only one on him for last shot. I do agree that there should have been much less Iso. But you are assuming it did not come from the coach. That has been a common fan complaint at the end of games for the last 30 years. So not sure why you are blaming Randle specifically. Imo, JB needs to be the one creating at end of games.
Randle did have the two pass outs that led to Grimes big threes in overtime. He also broke up the out of bounds pass to Williams in final play. So there is that.
martin wrote:Dang, Knicks fans are probably confused by this streak lol
Thought Berman retired. Can you answer if 1248 was Berman? Or am I am asshole for outing him.
A win is a win. This one took some guts and resilience
HofstraBBall wrote:GustavBahler wrote:Brunson got us through OT. Grimes is finding his stroke.I shouldnt want to see Randle traded after putting up numbers like he just did. But I do. Still closes games like he's throwing them. WTF was holding the ball for the entire shot clock, and going one on 3 to close regulation?
This is the kind of stuff that will kill a playoff run. And Randle does it way too much.
You must not have watched the game. Williams was the only one on him for last shot. I do agree that there should have been much less Iso. But you are assuming it did not come from the coach. That has been a common fan complaint at the end of games for the last 30 years. So not sure why you are blaming Randle specifically. Imo, JB needs to be the one creating at end of games.
Randle did have the two pass outs that led to Grimes big threes in im overtime. He also broke up the out of bounds pass to Williams in final play. So there is that.
He had triple coverage before getting the ball out to Grimes how got the lucky bounce. Things rolling in the Knicks favor, but Randle was definitely holding the ball in triple coverage with a minute on the clock.
Clean wrote:KnickDanger wrote:BigRedDog wrote:Can't anyone set picks? Just one on one offense
I read your posts - every single one negative, complaining whining. Knicks pull out a tough one on the road in OT and then you have nothing to say. Amazing.
Is it negative if it is the truth? Until I stopped watching every single play was ISO Randle. I guess you can't really call it one on one when we all know the double is coming once his back is turned.
Yes, if every post is a complaint but no mention of what went well - like winning - then it’s negative. Leaving out the whole story, in fact most of the story, is not “the truth.”
But I see some here seem to only get off on the negative. I find that weird.
KnickDanger wrote:Clean wrote:KnickDanger wrote:BigRedDog wrote:Can't anyone set picks? Just one on one offense
I read your posts - every single one negative, complaining whining. Knicks pull out a tough one on the road in OT and then you have nothing to say. Amazing.
Is it negative if it is the truth? Until I stopped watching every single play was ISO Randle. I guess you can't really call it one on one when we all know the double is coming once his back is turned.
Yes, if every post is a complaint but no mention of what went well - like winning - then it’s negative. Leaving out the whole story, in fact most of the story, is not “the truth.”But I see some here seem to only get off on the negative. I find that weird.
KD is right. You only post negative, you are the NY Post.
wargames wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:Whine all you want you whining bastards but we have the best record in the first 28 since 2017. Thibs hopefully stays away from Randle Iso. Not like we were not scoring all game without it.
Randle 31/13/7
JB 30/7
RJ 22 and 57% from 3pt
I don’t know if Thibs said “Randle do iso 10 times in a row including a 24 second violation to end the regulation” or Randle just chose to do it but I’m still fire Thibs and trade Randle.
It was a good win but it doesn’t change how I feel about those two. We’ve seen this before and we’ve seen the wheels fall off of this before too.
Would you say that you have seen it since 1980's?
It's called the NBA. I do hate the iso play but that is what this league is. Maybe do what I do which is watch college basketball for enjoyment and Knicks to break TVs.
EwingsGlass wrote:martin wrote:Dang, Knicks fans are probably confused by this streak lol
Thought Berman retired. Can you answer if 1248 was Berman? Or am I am asshole for outing him.
He’s been talking trash for a few days. I think he might come back or is just a fan of trolling the Knicks.
EwingsGlass wrote:KnickDanger wrote:Clean wrote:KnickDanger wrote:BigRedDog wrote:Can't anyone set picks? Just one on one offense
I read your posts - every single one negative, complaining whining. Knicks pull out a tough one on the road in OT and then you have nothing to say. Amazing.
Is it negative if it is the truth? Until I stopped watching every single play was ISO Randle. I guess you can't really call it one on one when we all know the double is coming once his back is turned.
Yes, if every post is a complaint but no mention of what went well - like winning - then it’s negative. Leaving out the whole story, in fact most of the story, is not “the truth.”But I see some here seem to only get off on the negative. I find that weird.
KD is right. You only post negative, you are the NY Post.
I only post negative? or BigRedDog? I been pretty positive since they went with the young guards.
