If he becomes available and the Celtics are willing to trade him to NY their divisional rival. You give them whatever they want.
Only because it’s lowkey a sport miracle
I imagine RJ would have to be playing like an all-star this season, for Boston to entertain the thought. He isnt. RJ is playing better, but I doubt well enough to make this trade doable.
BigRedDog wrote:Philc1 wrote:BigRedDog wrote:Boston isn't this dumb or cheap and they aren't trading with the Knicks.
Is that why they offered us Brown plus picks for Porzingis years ago?
That was before Brown was established and Porzingis was a rising star. But there was no way we were going to trade Porzingis there.
You need to be more direct.
For example, why would anyone with half a brain think that the KP trade scenario that didn’t actually get executed years ago is relevant and informative to anything that’ll happen today in a much different environment? It’s absurd.
BigRedDog wrote:Boston isn't this dumb or cheap and they aren't trading with the Knicks.
I’ve given many reasons in this thread and all you got is ‘they ain’t trading with the Knicks’?
BigRedDog wrote:Philc1 wrote:BigRedDog wrote:Boston isn't this dumb or cheap and they aren't trading with the Knicks.
Is that why they offered us Brown plus picks for Porzingis years ago?
That was before Brown was established and Porzingis was a rising star. But there was no way we were going to trade Porzingis there.
Phil was about to pull the trigger and Dolan unfortunately listened to the media and vetoed it
martin wrote:BigRedDog wrote:Philc1 wrote:BigRedDog wrote:Boston isn't this dumb or cheap and they aren't trading with the Knicks.
Is that why they offered us Brown plus picks for Porzingis years ago?
That was before Brown was established and Porzingis was a rising star. But there was no way we were going to trade Porzingis there.
You need to be more direct.
For example, why would anyone with half a brain think that the KP trade scenario that didn’t actually get executed years ago is relevant and informative to anything that’ll happen today in a much different environment? It’s absurd.
https://985thesportshub.com/2019/11/08/report-celtics-offered-jaylen-brown-for-kristaps-porzingis-in-2017/
https://celticswire.usatoday.com/2019/11/08/celtics-offered-jaylen-brown-first-round-pick-kristaps-porzingis-2016/
https://www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/2017/6/22/15856240/kristaps-porzingis-trade-knicks-celtics-nba-draft-2017
The Celtics and Knicks have been willing to talk trade before
Philc1 wrote:martin wrote:BigRedDog wrote:Philc1 wrote:BigRedDog wrote:Boston isn't this dumb or cheap and they aren't trading with the Knicks.
Is that why they offered us Brown plus picks for Porzingis years ago?
That was before Brown was established and Porzingis was a rising star. But there was no way we were going to trade Porzingis there.
You need to be more direct.
For example, why would anyone with half a brain think that the KP trade scenario that didn’t actually get executed years ago is relevant and informative to anything that’ll happen today in a much different environment? It’s absurd.
https://985thesportshub.com/2019/11/08/report-celtics-offered-jaylen-brown-for-kristaps-porzingis-in-2017/
https://celticswire.usatoday.com/2019/11/08/celtics-offered-jaylen-brown-first-round-pick-kristaps-porzingis-2016/
https://www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/2017/6/22/15856240/kristaps-porzingis-trade-knicks-celtics-nba-draft-2017
The Celtics and Knicks have been willing to talk trade before
So what? Has nothing to do with today.
Unless you are taking this literally, like the Celtics won’t trade with the Knicks ever, which is really a stupid assumption
How do you have a law degree?
