martin wrote:
I have been impressed with Steve Novak and 34 year old Tyler Murray who fill in for Clyde and Breen.
Murray does the Radio which is a different type of art, but one that has groomed him.
He sounds and acts more mature than his 34 year age.
Martin's post from the game thread.
martin wrote:
I don't know what this us all about but I am in! What is H2O going to do? I hope it's shoot
some Trey Burke news......
https://fadeawayworld.net/nba-media/trey...I wish he elaborted on some rituals. Any knicks?
Trey was a guy that was there, had the talent, but shows how thin the margins can be. Often its the right coach and right team to get that contract/opportunity.
martin wrote:OK
Just shoot 1000 free throws every day. Put some arch, get a shooting coach, shoot underhand. In other words, figure it out man. Stop complaining, that's lame
ramtour420 wrote:martin wrote:OK
Just shoot 1000 free throws every day. Put some arch, get a shooting coach, shoot underhand. In other words, figure it out man. Stop complaining, that's lame
Reading Mitch’s tweets kills brain cells. I do not recommend it.
martin wrote:Oh yeah
The answer is Micheal Ray Richardson
martin wrote:Oh yeah
Under rated?? King was phenomenal but his career here was very short and if anything becuase of that he was a bit over rated?
Maybe guys like Guiren and Bellamy because of the era and they were not always successful.
Guys in the HOF are not really under rated but pehraps their contributions are?
Maybe Jerry Lucas a bit? Not great numbers but was there when it mattered making finals twice, winning one. THis when Reed was wearing down.
I mention King as he is revered as an all time great but he played only 203 games.
Made playoffs twice, three series, and won just one. Lost in 7 to eventual champs Boston in 1984 who won the chip that year.
He had a moment. It was a hell of a run. Maybe im wrong here?
McAdoo was here for 186 games and avg 26pts a game. Lead the league. Made playoffs one and one in first round. No moments, but just a blip. Had like a 3 year "Melo" like stint.
I like mention of Michael Ray. Some say he was nearly as good as Magic? Perhaps underated given the potential?
Nalod wrote:martin wrote:Oh yeah
Under rated?? King was phenomenal but his career here was very short and if anything becuase of that he was a bit over rated?
Maybe guys like Guiren and Bellamy because of the era and they were not always successful.
Guys in the HOF are not really under rated but pehraps their contributions are?
Maybe Jerry Lucas a bit? Not great numbers but was there when it mattered making finals twice, winning one. THis when Reed was wearing down.
I mention King as he is revered as an all time great but he played only 203 games.
Made playoffs twice, three series, and won just one. Lost in 7 to eventual champs Boston in 1984 who won the chip that year.
He had a moment. It was a hell of a run. Maybe im wrong here?
McAdoo was here for 186 games and avg 26pts a game. Lead the league. Made playoffs one and one in first round. No moments, but just a blip. Had like a 3 year "Melo" like stint.
I like mention of Michael Ray. Some say he was nearly as good as Magic? Perhaps underated given the potential?
Micheal Ray is basically unknown to under 40 age Knicks fans as an 80s player.
He was the most gifted PG in Knicks history whose career was cut short by drug problems.
But before he fell from grace he was the most electrifying player you could ever want to watch.
He had Kyrie handles and eyes in the back of his head. He could dime you from anywhere in the court.
He could find a lane in traffic the naked eye couldn't see and get to the rim and make it look easy.
He was an elite defender with size, strength, quicksilver reactions and great athleticism who could shut down top scorers.
He was a pickpocketing menace who led the league in steals.
In a nutshell, anytime the ball was in his hands you held your breath wondering what the hell he was going to do. He was a magician with the basketball. He could out-magic Magic Johnson.
