EwingsGlass wrote:ToddTT wrote:martin wrote:Oh this def going to happen
Hmmmm. Super interesting. I wonder why he would post that comment.
I assume he'll come off the bench for at least a couple of weeks. Even if he hoped to start.
He's absolutely right and I fucking love it. He can absolutely command a little more usage in the second unit and I think it would be a HUGE developmental step for him. LOVE the idea. I was a little worried he would take offense to being in the second unit, but it sounds like he sees it the way I do, at least. Love the possibilities here.
When Knicks FO paid him and put there faith in him. He said thank you for believing in me and that he'll do whatever it takes for the org. IHart is also one of his best friends and the supposedly talk everyday.
Mitch back before the end of the month?! Today is the 20th.
martin wrote:Mitch back before the end of the month?! Today is the 20th.
If Perk ever visits, he can have all the damn chips.
gah... didnt realize you posted all the Mitch stuff here.
This is so huge. Just because we go 15-2 or whatever w/ OG folks forgot whats an impact player Mitch is. Dude literally won us the Cle series. Bottom line is IHeart absolutely became a better player in Mitch's absence and showed his value in extended minutes. Having Mitch off the bench really changes the look of our team.
Should be a good listen. Hopefully Julius got some good news to share.
Can’t get enough of these updates.
martin wrote:LOVE IT
It's the most logically choice. While OG being out got majority of the attention. The difference IHart makes when is playing at full strength has been massive. Completely changes the outlook of the squad
This is whay I been asking for from Thibs for years. Movement makes the defense make mistakes in coverage. Please don't stop this if Randle comes back.
martin wrote:
I approve.
EAST W L PCT GB STRK L10 HOME AWAY PPG OPPG DIFF
-------- -- -- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
1 Boston 55 14 0.797 - W7 8-2 32-3 23-11 121.0 109.5 11.5
2 Milwaukee 45 25 0.643 10.5 W1 6-4 28-7 17-18 120.6 117.2 3.4
3 Cleveland 43 26 0.623 12 L1 4-6 22-14 21-12 113.4 109.4 4.0
4 Orlando 42 28 0.6 13.5 W5 8-2 25-9 17-19 110.9 108.8 2.1
5 New York 41 28 0.594 14 L1 6-4 22-13 19-15 111.9 108.0 3.9
6 Indiana 39 31 0.557 16.5 W1 5-5 21-15 18-16 122.8 120.7 2.1
7 Miami 38 31 0.551 17 W1 5-5 17-15 21-16 109.7 109.2 0.5
8 Philadelphia 38 31 0.551 17 L1 4-6 21-15 17-16 114.7 112.4 2.3
9 Chicago 34 36 0.486 21.5 L1 6-4 18-17 16-19 112.1 113.7 -1.6
10 Atlanta 30 39 0.435 25 L2 4-6 16-17 14-22 119.0 121.2 -2.2 11 Brooklyn 26 44 0.371 29.5 L5 2-8 16-19 10-25 111.4 114.0 -2.6
12 Toronto 23 46 0.333 32 L8 1-9 13-21 10-25 113.3 118.1 -4.8
13 Charlotte 17 52 0.246 38 L3 2-8 9-24 8-28 106.6 116.7 -10.1
14 Detroit 12 57 0.174 43 L4 3-7 7-29 5-28 111.6 120.1 -8.5
15 Washington 12 58 0.171 43.5 W1 3-7 5-28 7-30 113.8 123.9 -10.1
WEST W L PCT GB STRK L10 HOME AWAY PPG OPPG DIFF
-------- -- -- ----- ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----
1 Oklahoma City 48 20 0.706 - W3 7-3 28-7 20-13 120.7 113.0 7.7
2 Denver 49 21 0.7 - W2 8-2 28-6 21-15 114.7 110.1 4.6
3 Minnesota 47 22 0.681 1.5 L1 5-5 23-9 24-13 113.3 106.7 6.6
4 Los Angeles 43 25 0.632 5 W1 5-5 22-11 21-14 116.5 112.5 4.0
5 New Orleans 42 27 0.609 6.5 L1 7-3 20-13 22-14 115.8 110.9 4.9
6 Dallas 41 29 0.586 8 W3 7-3 22-15 19-14 118.6 117.0 1.6
7 Phoenix 41 29 0.586 8 W2 6-4 23-14 18-15 117.1 114.4 2.7
8 Sacramento 40 29 0.58 8.5 L1 6-4 20-13 20-16 117.9 116.5 1.4
9 Los Angeles 37 32 0.536 11.5 W1 6-4 25-12 12-20 117.5 117.6 -0.1
10 Golden State 36 32 0.529 12 W1 5-5 18-18 18-14 118.6 116.8 1.8
11 Houston 34 35 0.493 14.5 W7 9-1 24-11 10-24 113.8 112.6 1.2
12 Utah 29 41 0.414 20 L4 2-8 20-15 9-26 116.8 120.5 -3.7
13 Memphis 23 47 0.329 26 L4 3-7 8-27 15-20 106.0 112.8 -6.8
14 Portland 19 50 0.275 29.5 L4 2-8 11-25 8-25 107.6 115.8 -8.2
15 San Antonio 15 54 0.217 33.5 L1 4-6 8-25 7-29 112.3 119.7 -7.4
https://www.espn.com/nba/standings
I disagree. But maybe that’s what he was going for.
