The interview with RJ and Hart at the end of the game was so fascinating visually. RJ towered over Hart - always hanging his head down to be closer to Hart's level. The man plays much bigger than his size - he's like a 6'3" guy who has the presence of a 6'7" bully. Sort like Draymond or Barkley or Zion (ha!).
I'm really thrilled by this team's potential. The Randle injury is a tough break - but he has 4 days to get ready to at it again. He seemed well and in good spirits on the bench as well as the post-game farewells to the Cavs team.
The Cavs team just had an unfortunate bad matchup against the Knicks for a 50+ win team. Allen and Mobley are accustomed to being the tallest/longest/most athletic bigs on the floor. Certainly one of them should have a favorable match up. Yet the Knicks were one of the few teams in the league that has bigger/longer/stronger players that could match their athleticism, so their own version of bullyball was neutralized.
Then there was the back court: The Cavs bought into trading for the 6'1" Mitchell as their SG and had to deal with the consequences (albeit coming from a 44 win, 9th seed team last year!). The Knicks loaded up on athletic wing defenders. On the surface, Quickley had an oddly poor offensive series, but look a little deeper and he devoted the bulk of his energy to defense. His advanced defensive metrics were off the charts and played a big role in neutralizing the Cavs guards, particularly in game 3 onward.
Buying out Kevin Love late in the season ended up being a critical decision for the Cavs and they really paid for it. Instead of having a big man who could score from anywhere and take center defenders out of the paint to the 3pt line, the Knicks always seemed to have a 7 footer in the paint on D. (Love made it to the second round with the Heat, so we'll have a nice opportunity to thank him for sabotaging the franchise that so handsomely rewarded him!)
Anyway, great series win. There were 3 notable players on the Knicks:
* Brunson is a legit #1 option on offense. The Cavs didn't have any good answers. I think putting a taller defender on Brunson tends to put him on an iso mindset and with the effect of disrupting flow of the Knicks offense. Still, it isn't a bad choice to let Brunson do his work - he produces points in those circumstances!
* The redemption arc of RJ is a big deal - usually it gets harder for players the longer a series goes on as opponents figure them out. But instead, it looks like RJ figured out his defenders and found a way to get stronger as the series went on. That's not to diminish his contributions in the first two games - he had big steals and assists early on, plus was part of the gang of defenders keeping Mitchell and Garland at bay. He did his part making things difficult for two smaller, quicker players. RJ may not get enough credit for his contributions. The biggest thing to note was that he gave the team what they needed when they needed it.
* Mitch really dominated late in the series. It's almost like a switch went off and he realized what a physical advantage he had over his opponents, so long as the refs don't call tick tack fouls early! He dominated on D and rebounds. We've talked about it for years, but when he's right he's about as impactful as any big in the game. I initially considered calling out the Knicks two-headed center monster for giving the Cavs 48 minutes of strong effort. Hartenstein was great too and did everything he was supposed to.
Moving forward:
I'm a little worried about Randle's injury and whether he'll be ready for the next series. He seemed in good spirits as the game drew to a close. Grimes seemed to be celebrating and fist pumping like his shoulder didn't hurt either. :) I think we can beat the Heat without Randle/Grimes at 100%, but at the same time it makes our margin of error much smaller.