BigDaddyG wrote:martin wrote:
We all know P Diddy is being stashed. I don't want to give anyone Frank PTSD, but he is only 18.
Looks like this kid can actually shoot though. Frank was horrendous offensively.
martin wrote:
Sheesh… Mikal lookin’ redundant.
My lack of interest in the 2024 draft class has just been validated. I feel totally vindicated for my laziness. Good job me
martin wrote:
I wonder if Fili lasts to 38
The fact that we are still in cap saving mode is proof they are giving Hart the most they can possible. That and OG waiting for after the trade to finalize his deal is all the proof you need IHart is still in the equation. Cap god is working for that money.
martin wrote:
Enrique Freeman!
I like this - Knicks are out of rotation spots and need to save vs the cap
Dadiet has upside and can be stashed.
ToddTT wrote:martin wrote:
Sheesh… Mikal lookin’ redundant.
From the Athletic's final mock.
30. Boston Celtics
Pacôme Dadiet | 6-8 wing | 18 years old | Ratiopharm Ulm
Dadiet has been a fast riser over the last few weeks as he’s been in the United States working out for NBA teams for the first time. A 6-foot-8 wing with legitimate scoring instincts and a smooth touch at 18 years old, Dadiet has teams excited about what he could be in the future if things go right with his development moving forward.He’ll go somewhere in the No. 20 to 35 range, in all likelihood. League sources have also pegged the Bucks as an option for Dadiet as well.
Knicks not picking a center tells me Ihart is still a possibility.
Knew I shouldn't have bothered researching any of these prospects!
Sucks but I get it. It's all about having as much money available for Hartenstein. Expecting more draft and stash type selections tomorrow.
But Dadiet cannot be as bad as Ntilikina, can he? 
SergioNYK wrote:Knew I shouldn't have bothered researching any of these prospects! Sucks but I get it. It's all about having as much money available for Hartenstein. Expecting more draft and stash type selections tomorrow.
But Dadiet cannot be as bad as Ntilikina, can he?
I don't think so. But even if is, I don't think most fans would've had a problem with Frank if he was draft 26 instead of 8.
BigDaddyG wrote:ToddTT wrote:martin wrote:
Sheesh… Mikal lookin’ redundant.
From the Athletic's final mock.
30. Boston Celtics
Pacôme Dadiet | 6-8 wing | 18 years old | Ratiopharm Ulm
Dadiet has been a fast riser over the last few weeks as he’s been in the United States working out for NBA teams for the first time. A 6-foot-8 wing with legitimate scoring instincts and a smooth touch at 18 years old, Dadiet has teams excited about what he could be in the future if things go right with his development moving forward.He’ll go somewhere in the No. 20 to 35 range, in all likelihood. League sources have also pegged the Bucks as an option for Dadiet as well.
Ringer compared him to Michael Finley.
SergioNYK wrote:Knew I shouldn't have bothered researching any of these prospects! Sucks but I get it. It's all about having as much money available for Hartenstein. Expecting more draft and stash type selections tomorrow.
But Dadiet cannot be as bad as Ntilikina, can he?
Bet you are a blast at parties? Find some joy, my man. We got a new baby boy!
EwingsGlass wrote:SergioNYK wrote:Knew I shouldn't have bothered researching any of these prospects! Sucks but I get it. It's all about having as much money available for Hartenstein. Expecting more draft and stash type selections tomorrow.
But Dadiet cannot be as bad as Ntilikina, can he?
Bet you are a blast at parties? Find some joy, my man. We got a new baby boy!
I just wanted some excitement tonight but I'm not down or anything. Reading Dadiet might not necessarily be a stash and his tape is impressive. Would be nice to have a wing learn from Hart, Mikal and Hart.
Something I don't understand. If the point of tonight was to save money why did we not trade the 25th pick and draft with the 26th? We would have saved some more cap space.
Clean wrote:Something I don't understand. If the point of tonight was to save money why did we not trade the 25th pick and draft with the 26th? We would have saved some more cap space.
I think they had to actually make the NYK pick to comply with Stepien rule.
EwingsGlass wrote:Clean wrote:Something I don't understand. If the point of tonight was to save money why did we not trade the 25th pick and draft with the 26th? We would have saved some more cap space.
I think they had to actually make the NYK pick to comply with Stepien rule.
Makes sense. How long donyhe Knicks need to keep his righys before he's moved?
EwingsGlass wrote:Clean wrote:Something I don't understand. If the point of tonight was to save money why did we not trade the 25th pick and draft with the 26th? We would have saved some more cap space.
I think they had to actually make the NYK pick to comply with Stepien rule.
OK, that makes sense. Thanks for rthe help.
BigDaddyG wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:Clean wrote:Something I don't understand. If the point of tonight was to save money why did we not trade the 25th pick and draft with the 26th? We would have saved some more cap space.
I think they had to actually make the NYK pick to comply with Stepien rule.
Makes sense. How long donyhe Knicks need to keep his righys before he's moved?
Literally just have to make the pick.
