Knicks · Knicks against the world!:2023 FIBA World Cup (page 3)

Alpha1971 @ 8/11/2023 2:41 AM
IQ should start. I mean if Mitchell can do it then I Q can with Brunson. That extra ball handler will help RJ and Mitch score more efficiently. Then the bench with DDV, HEart, Hart, and Grimes becomes more lethal. IQ plays refense defense well so it's worth a try. Team will be small but fast and hard to guard. Should be fun. Plus starting IQ may raise his trade value where if he is traded we can trade him for a bigger wing. Similar to how Haliburton got traded for Sabobis. No need to add picks to trade for a young combo guard to get a similar young wing.
martin @ 8/11/2023 7:36 AM
Alpha1971 wrote:IQ should start. I mean if Mitchell can do it then I Q can with Brunson. That extra ball handler will help RJ and Mitch score more efficiently. Then the bench with DDV, HEart, Hart, and Grimes becomes more lethal. IQ plays refense defense well so it's worth a try. Team will be small but fast and hard to guard. Should be fun. Plus starting IQ may raise his trade value where if he is traded we can trade him for a bigger wing. Similar to how Haliburton got traded for Sabobis. No need to add picks to trade for a young combo guard to get a similar young wing.

IQ plays off-ball team defense very well. His man defense is no where near where Grimes is.

For me, I don't quite understand the call for IQ to start over Grimes, there seems to be so much team benefit for IQ to come off bench to space out his PG minutes with Brunson.

Doesn't mean IQ doesn't deserve to start in a different type situation but all the calls for IQ to start as a Knicks with the current roster seems short sighted to me.

What is better for the team?

Nalod @ 8/11/2023 7:54 AM
Rookie wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
LivingLegend wrote:
martin wrote:

Zero assists for RJ - remember thinking we were getting a PG like wing who would rack up assists but that was an uninformed conclusion on my part.

RJ might have the green light to get buckets. But thats why I like the idea of IQ at the 2, to help keep the ball moving as another distributor on the court. I dont see RJ getting benched.

TBH, Im hoping that this tournament helps Brunson become a better distributor. We know he can get buckets.

Man I thought Brunson showed he is an elite distributor against Puerto Rico, it took one game to see what he can do with better players around him.

I took one game vs Puerto Rico. Not an NBA team.

How many minutes did RJ Play?
How many shots were missed were he could have earned the assist?
Anyone see the game or just the highlight?
And He avgs about 3 assists a game in the NBA. RJ is a finisher. WE liked Playoff RJ. LEts hope that was the floor going forward.
The more RJ is threat to score, the more defense has to come to him and thats when his playmaking is judged. FIBA teams with little experience with each other don’t have good team defense/switch especially early on.
How did Canada get down so much so early? Germany get hot? Canada cold? Too much passing?
This is what tune up games are for.

EwingPSD @ 8/11/2023 9:09 AM
martin wrote:
Alpha1971 wrote:IQ should start. I mean if Mitchell can do it then I Q can with Brunson. That extra ball handler will help RJ and Mitch score more efficiently. Then the bench with DDV, HEart, Hart, and Grimes becomes more lethal. IQ plays refense defense well so it's worth a try. Team will be small but fast and hard to guard. Should be fun. Plus starting IQ may raise his trade value where if he is traded we can trade him for a bigger wing. Similar to how Haliburton got traded for Sabobis. No need to add picks to trade for a young combo guard to get a similar young wing.

IQ plays off-ball team defense very well. His man defense is no where near where Grimes is.

For me, I don't quite understand the call for IQ to start over Grimes, there seems to be so much team benefit for IQ to come off bench to space out his PG minutes with Brunson.

Doesn't mean IQ doesn't deserve to start in a different type situation but all the calls for IQ to start as a Knicks with the current roster seems short sighted to me.

What is better for the team?

IQ has really struggled as a lead guard without a clear 1st option on the floor. He's played really well with Brunson and is the only player who always has a positive +/- with Randle. If he comes off the bench I think it would be best for the team if either Brunson or Randle was the starter that was subbed for early so they could play with IQ and the bench. I actually think what is best for the team on paper is a starting lineup with both IQ and Grimes and no Barrett. That's not the type of change Thibs goes for though.

Rookie @ 8/11/2023 10:59 AM
Nalod wrote:
Rookie wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
LivingLegend wrote:
martin wrote:

Zero assists for RJ - remember thinking we were getting a PG like wing who would rack up assists but that was an uninformed conclusion on my part.

RJ might have the green light to get buckets. But thats why I like the idea of IQ at the 2, to help keep the ball moving as another distributor on the court. I dont see RJ getting benched.

TBH, Im hoping that this tournament helps Brunson become a better distributor. We know he can get buckets.

Man I thought Brunson showed he is an elite distributor against Puerto Rico, it took one game to see what he can do with better players around him.

I took one game vs Puerto Rico. Not an NBA team.

How many minutes did RJ Play?
How many shots were missed were he could have earned the assist?
Anyone see the game or just the highlight?
And He avgs about 3 assists a game in the NBA. RJ is a finisher. WE liked Playoff RJ. LEts hope that was the floor going forward.
The more RJ is threat to score, the more defense has to come to him and thats when his playmaking is judged. FIBA teams with little experience with each other don’t have good team defense/switch especially early on.
How did Canada get down so much so early? Germany get hot? Canada cold? Too much passing?
This is what tune up games are for.

Did you watch the game? Brunson was slick as hell threading passes. He was playing distributer and didn't really try and score that much until after it was a blowout.

I looked for RJ's game but didn't see that it was televised anywhere. Just looking at the box score and highlights I saw the saw old RJ pounding the ball into dust. When I see he was 5-10 from the field I automatically assume that he missed 5 of 10 contested layups since he doesn't shoot from the midrange. Same old head down decision making. He also looks very slow. Basically he looked like the same RJ from the regular season, you know, where he decides what he is going to do when he gets the ball and doesn't read the floor at all. You know he isn't ever going to pass the ball and so does the defense. That's 5 missed layups against what you have already said is not an NBA team.

Canada is a favorite in the tournament right behind Team USA. Canada should meet team USA at some point. RJ is going to get torched on D by Ingram and JJJ is going treat his lunch at the rim. Canada better hope that his 3pt shot is working, but I actually like that RJ only took (4) 3 point shots in that game. He shouldn't be a volume shooter

In closing, I was excited about RJ when I thought he was slimming down but the idea of RJ as a bruising wing who can't shoot next to Randle really sucks. How is he going to stay in front of athletic wings on D? If he wants to be a PF he should get Obi minutes and not share the floor with Randle. It's a bad fit, not enough spacing.

Oh crap, how did I turn this into an RJ rant? Oops

Nalod @ 8/11/2023 12:38 PM
Rookie wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Rookie wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
LivingLegend wrote:
martin wrote:

Zero assists for RJ - remember thinking we were getting a PG like wing who would rack up assists but that was an uninformed conclusion on my part.

RJ might have the green light to get buckets. But thats why I like the idea of IQ at the 2, to help keep the ball moving as another distributor on the court. I dont see RJ getting benched.

TBH, Im hoping that this tournament helps Brunson become a better distributor. We know he can get buckets.

Man I thought Brunson showed he is an elite distributor against Puerto Rico, it took one game to see what he can do with better players around him.

I took one game vs Puerto Rico. Not an NBA team.

How many minutes did RJ Play?
How many shots were missed were he could have earned the assist?
Anyone see the game or just the highlight?
And He avgs about 3 assists a game in the NBA. RJ is a finisher. WE liked Playoff RJ. LEts hope that was the floor going forward.
The more RJ is threat to score, the more defense has to come to him and thats when his playmaking is judged. FIBA teams with little experience with each other don’t have good team defense/switch especially early on.
How did Canada get down so much so early? Germany get hot? Canada cold? Too much passing?
This is what tune up games are for.

Did you watch the game? Brunson was slick as hell threading passes. He was playing distributer and didn't really try and score that much until after it was a blowout.

I looked for RJ's game but didn't see that it was televised anywhere. Just looking at the box score and highlights I saw the saw old RJ pounding the ball into dust. When I see he was 5-10 from the field I automatically assume that he missed 5 of 10 contested layups since he doesn't shoot from the midrange. Same old head down decision making. He also looks very slow. Basically he looked like the same RJ from the regular season, you know, where he decides what he is going to do when he gets the ball and doesn't read the floor at all. You know he isn't ever going to pass the ball and so does the defense. That's 5 missed layups against what you have already said is not an NBA team.

Canada is a favorite in the tournament right behind Team USA. Canada should meet team USA at some point. RJ is going to get torched on D by Ingram and JJJ is going treat his lunch at the rim. Canada better hope that his 3pt shot is working, but I actually like that RJ only took (4) 3 point shots in that game. He shouldn't be a volume shooter

In closing, I was excited about RJ when I thought he was slimming down but the idea of RJ as a bruising wing who can't shoot next to Randle really sucks. How is he going to stay in front of athletic wings on D? If he wants to be a PF he should get Obi minutes and not share the floor with Randle. It's a bad fit, not enough spacing.

Oh crap, how did I turn this into an RJ rant? Oops

I did not see the Canada game which is why I was asking.
And you answered it, but you did not see it either.
No problem on the rant. but you took the Highlights and extrapolated it and his career into a big indictment of hate.
I suppose you thought he'd lose a few LBs and be Sean Elliott? Rudy Gay? is the 3rd pick expectation a thing? its where Jordan was drafted.
In my book RJ is what he is despite the draft spot. The kid to me just has to up his deep Shooting % to about 36-38% and grab one more board a game.
He is our 3rd option. But Im not going to convince anyone nor you to me until the games are played. He has to show it.
I doubt he'll change much but evolve as he goes.

Rookie @ 8/11/2023 2:26 PM
Nalod wrote:
Rookie wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Rookie wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
LivingLegend wrote:
martin wrote:

Zero assists for RJ - remember thinking we were getting a PG like wing who would rack up assists but that was an uninformed conclusion on my part.

RJ might have the green light to get buckets. But thats why I like the idea of IQ at the 2, to help keep the ball moving as another distributor on the court. I dont see RJ getting benched.

TBH, Im hoping that this tournament helps Brunson become a better distributor. We know he can get buckets.

Man I thought Brunson showed he is an elite distributor against Puerto Rico, it took one game to see what he can do with better players around him.

I took one game vs Puerto Rico. Not an NBA team.

How many minutes did RJ Play?
How many shots were missed were he could have earned the assist?
Anyone see the game or just the highlight?
And He avgs about 3 assists a game in the NBA. RJ is a finisher. WE liked Playoff RJ. LEts hope that was the floor going forward.
The more RJ is threat to score, the more defense has to come to him and thats when his playmaking is judged. FIBA teams with little experience with each other don’t have good team defense/switch especially early on.
How did Canada get down so much so early? Germany get hot? Canada cold? Too much passing?
This is what tune up games are for.

Did you watch the game? Brunson was slick as hell threading passes. He was playing distributer and didn't really try and score that much until after it was a blowout.

I looked for RJ's game but didn't see that it was televised anywhere. Just looking at the box score and highlights I saw the saw old RJ pounding the ball into dust. When I see he was 5-10 from the field I automatically assume that he missed 5 of 10 contested layups since he doesn't shoot from the midrange. Same old head down decision making. He also looks very slow. Basically he looked like the same RJ from the regular season, you know, where he decides what he is going to do when he gets the ball and doesn't read the floor at all. You know he isn't ever going to pass the ball and so does the defense. That's 5 missed layups against what you have already said is not an NBA team.

Canada is a favorite in the tournament right behind Team USA. Canada should meet team USA at some point. RJ is going to get torched on D by Ingram and JJJ is going treat his lunch at the rim. Canada better hope that his 3pt shot is working, but I actually like that RJ only took (4) 3 point shots in that game. He shouldn't be a volume shooter

In closing, I was excited about RJ when I thought he was slimming down but the idea of RJ as a bruising wing who can't shoot next to Randle really sucks. How is he going to stay in front of athletic wings on D? If he wants to be a PF he should get Obi minutes and not share the floor with Randle. It's a bad fit, not enough spacing.

Oh crap, how did I turn this into an RJ rant? Oops

I did not see the Canada game which is why I was asking.
And you answered it, but you did not see it either.
No problem on the rant. but you took the Highlights and extrapolated it and his career into a big indictment of hate.
I suppose you thought he'd lose a few LBs and be Sean Elliott? Rudy Gay? is the 3rd pick expectation a thing? its where Jordan was drafted.
In my book RJ is what he is despite the draft spot. The kid to me just has to up his deep Shooting % to about 36-38% and grab one more board a game.
He is our 3rd option. But Im not going to convince anyone nor you to me until the games are played. He has to show it.
I doubt he'll change much but evolve as he goes.

Anyway my point was this - why doesn't Brunson pass more to his Knicks teammates? If you look at the numbers, there is a better chance of something good happening then if he passes the ball to Mitch, RJ or Randle.

Just a quick look. If Brunson passes to RJ he will turn the ball over 2.2 times a game. He is going to miss a 3pt shot 69% of the time. He is going to miss a lay up 57% of the time and he rarely passes the ball - 2.8 asst's per game - and this is on volume shooting. I would rather pass to JJJ, Ingram or Edwards.

RJ needs to develop an old man pull up mid range game.

Nalod @ 8/11/2023 2:50 PM
Rookie wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Rookie wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Rookie wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
LivingLegend wrote:
martin wrote:

Zero assists for RJ - remember thinking we were getting a PG like wing who would rack up assists but that was an uninformed conclusion on my part.

RJ might have the green light to get buckets. But thats why I like the idea of IQ at the 2, to help keep the ball moving as another distributor on the court. I dont see RJ getting benched.

TBH, Im hoping that this tournament helps Brunson become a better distributor. We know he can get buckets.

Man I thought Brunson showed he is an elite distributor against Puerto Rico, it took one game to see what he can do with better players around him.

I took one game vs Puerto Rico. Not an NBA team.

How many minutes did RJ Play?
How many shots were missed were he could have earned the assist?
Anyone see the game or just the highlight?
And He avgs about 3 assists a game in the NBA. RJ is a finisher. WE liked Playoff RJ. LEts hope that was the floor going forward.
The more RJ is threat to score, the more defense has to come to him and thats when his playmaking is judged. FIBA teams with little experience with each other don’t have good team defense/switch especially early on.
How did Canada get down so much so early? Germany get hot? Canada cold? Too much passing?
This is what tune up games are for.

Did you watch the game? Brunson was slick as hell threading passes. He was playing distributer and didn't really try and score that much until after it was a blowout.

I looked for RJ's game but didn't see that it was televised anywhere. Just looking at the box score and highlights I saw the saw old RJ pounding the ball into dust. When I see he was 5-10 from the field I automatically assume that he missed 5 of 10 contested layups since he doesn't shoot from the midrange. Same old head down decision making. He also looks very slow. Basically he looked like the same RJ from the regular season, you know, where he decides what he is going to do when he gets the ball and doesn't read the floor at all. You know he isn't ever going to pass the ball and so does the defense. That's 5 missed layups against what you have already said is not an NBA team.

Canada is a favorite in the tournament right behind Team USA. Canada should meet team USA at some point. RJ is going to get torched on D by Ingram and JJJ is going treat his lunch at the rim. Canada better hope that his 3pt shot is working, but I actually like that RJ only took (4) 3 point shots in that game. He shouldn't be a volume shooter

In closing, I was excited about RJ when I thought he was slimming down but the idea of RJ as a bruising wing who can't shoot next to Randle really sucks. How is he going to stay in front of athletic wings on D? If he wants to be a PF he should get Obi minutes and not share the floor with Randle. It's a bad fit, not enough spacing.

Oh crap, how did I turn this into an RJ rant? Oops

I did not see the Canada game which is why I was asking.
And you answered it, but you did not see it either.
No problem on the rant. but you took the Highlights and extrapolated it and his career into a big indictment of hate.
I suppose you thought he'd lose a few LBs and be Sean Elliott? Rudy Gay? is the 3rd pick expectation a thing? its where Jordan was drafted.
In my book RJ is what he is despite the draft spot. The kid to me just has to up his deep Shooting % to about 36-38% and grab one more board a game.
He is our 3rd option. But Im not going to convince anyone nor you to me until the games are played. He has to show it.
I doubt he'll change much but evolve as he goes.

Anyway my point was this - why doesn't Brunson pass more to his Knicks teammates? If you look at the numbers, there is a better chance of something good happening then if he passes the ball to Mitch, RJ or Randle.

Just a quick look. If Brunson passes to RJ he will turn the ball over 2.2 times a game. He is going to miss a 3pt shot 69% of the time. He is going to miss a lay up 57% of the time and he rarely passes the ball - 2.8 asst's per game - and this is on volume shooting. I would rather pass to JJJ, Ingram or Edwards.

RJ needs to develop an old man pull up mid range game.

Id rather pass it to Evan Fornier for that matter!!!

martin @ 8/11/2023 3:40 PM
Rookie wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Rookie wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Rookie wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
LivingLegend wrote:
martin wrote:

Zero assists for RJ - remember thinking we were getting a PG like wing who would rack up assists but that was an uninformed conclusion on my part.

RJ might have the green light to get buckets. But thats why I like the idea of IQ at the 2, to help keep the ball moving as another distributor on the court. I dont see RJ getting benched.

TBH, Im hoping that this tournament helps Brunson become a better distributor. We know he can get buckets.

Man I thought Brunson showed he is an elite distributor against Puerto Rico, it took one game to see what he can do with better players around him.

I took one game vs Puerto Rico. Not an NBA team.

How many minutes did RJ Play?
How many shots were missed were he could have earned the assist?
Anyone see the game or just the highlight?
And He avgs about 3 assists a game in the NBA. RJ is a finisher. WE liked Playoff RJ. LEts hope that was the floor going forward.
The more RJ is threat to score, the more defense has to come to him and thats when his playmaking is judged. FIBA teams with little experience with each other don’t have good team defense/switch especially early on.
How did Canada get down so much so early? Germany get hot? Canada cold? Too much passing?
This is what tune up games are for.

Did you watch the game? Brunson was slick as hell threading passes. He was playing distributer and didn't really try and score that much until after it was a blowout.

I looked for RJ's game but didn't see that it was televised anywhere. Just looking at the box score and highlights I saw the saw old RJ pounding the ball into dust. When I see he was 5-10 from the field I automatically assume that he missed 5 of 10 contested layups since he doesn't shoot from the midrange. Same old head down decision making. He also looks very slow. Basically he looked like the same RJ from the regular season, you know, where he decides what he is going to do when he gets the ball and doesn't read the floor at all. You know he isn't ever going to pass the ball and so does the defense. That's 5 missed layups against what you have already said is not an NBA team.

Canada is a favorite in the tournament right behind Team USA. Canada should meet team USA at some point. RJ is going to get torched on D by Ingram and JJJ is going treat his lunch at the rim. Canada better hope that his 3pt shot is working, but I actually like that RJ only took (4) 3 point shots in that game. He shouldn't be a volume shooter

In closing, I was excited about RJ when I thought he was slimming down but the idea of RJ as a bruising wing who can't shoot next to Randle really sucks. How is he going to stay in front of athletic wings on D? If he wants to be a PF he should get Obi minutes and not share the floor with Randle. It's a bad fit, not enough spacing.

Oh crap, how did I turn this into an RJ rant? Oops

I did not see the Canada game which is why I was asking.
And you answered it, but you did not see it either.
No problem on the rant. but you took the Highlights and extrapolated it and his career into a big indictment of hate.
I suppose you thought he'd lose a few LBs and be Sean Elliott? Rudy Gay? is the 3rd pick expectation a thing? its where Jordan was drafted.
In my book RJ is what he is despite the draft spot. The kid to me just has to up his deep Shooting % to about 36-38% and grab one more board a game.
He is our 3rd option. But Im not going to convince anyone nor you to me until the games are played. He has to show it.
I doubt he'll change much but evolve as he goes.

Anyway my point was this - why doesn't Brunson pass more to his Knicks teammates? If you look at the numbers, there is a better chance of something good happening then if he passes the ball to Mitch, RJ or Randle.

Just a quick look. If Brunson passes to RJ he will turn the ball over 2.2 times a game. He is going to miss a 3pt shot 69% of the time. He is going to miss a lay up 57% of the time and he rarely passes the ball - 2.8 asst's per game - and this is on volume shooting. I would rather pass to JJJ, Ingram or Edwards.

RJ needs to develop an old man pull up mid range game.

I thought we would have seen more of a distributor from Jalen this past year. I think there definitely is an adjustment period for Brunson - first time starting full time with the ball in his hands. It's not new but it's a big step up in role full time now that Doncic doesn't dominate everything.

Also, his teammates are still learning too. Mitch is pretty one-dimentinonal, Randle is so high usage and ISO heavy and not for nothing so has been RJ - both guys will need to and have adjusted their roles, slowly. Grimes spending more time on the defensive side of things first and then 3point outlet instead of a movement player.

For me, I think it's just been an adjustment for whole team. I'd expect more from Brunson this year; he has firmly established himself as a deadly scorer and now he can bait defenses with that AND his teammates will now also understand where to be and go while he does his thing. Young team, both in age and in know how offensively.

Nalod @ 8/11/2023 3:59 PM

Team assists? Golden State 1st. Knicks tied for last with Rockets.
Stands to reason our guys don't stat well in this department.

Offensive rebounding? 3rd. I imagine we get points off that and no assists tabulated.

I'd say with Josh and Isiah really coming on strong at seasons end, as did RJ one can say the last 10 games looked different than the first.
As it stands now a roster mostly the same from last year we could see a very nice continence towards 50+ wins.

I agree, we work so damn hard for shots (iso) but evidently we good at it!

fishmike @ 8/11/2023 4:57 PM
Nalod wrote:
Team assists? Golden State 1st. Knicks tied for last with Rockets.
Stands to reason our guys don't stat well in this department.

Offensive rebounding? 3rd. I imagine we get points off that and no assists tabulated.

I'd say with Josh and Isiah really coming on strong at seasons end, as did RJ one can say the last 10 games looked different than the first.
As it stands now a roster mostly the same from last year we could see a very nice continence towards 50+ wins.

I agree, we work so damn hard for shots (iso) but evidently we good at it!

https://www.nba.com/stats/teams/isolatio...
Yup... very good at it. Like 4th best in the NBA good at it (and BK stats reflect KD, etc)
Nalod @ 8/12/2023 9:23 AM
fishmike wrote:
Nalod wrote:
Team assists? Golden State 1st. Knicks tied for last with Rockets.
Stands to reason our guys don't stat well in this department.

Offensive rebounding? 3rd. I imagine we get points off that and no assists tabulated.

I'd say with Josh and Isiah really coming on strong at seasons end, as did RJ one can say the last 10 games looked different than the first.
As it stands now a roster mostly the same from last year we could see a very nice continence towards 50+ wins.

I agree, we work so damn hard for shots (iso) but evidently we good at it!

https://www.nba.com/stats/teams/isolatio...
Yup... very good at it. Like 4th best in the NBA good at it (and BK stats reflect KD, etc)

Good catch. I reckon it does not make sense to move away from strengths even if its ugly at times.
Not to say to say this is the path to a chip but its the path to contention and well suited for crunch time success.

At some point we either surge internally over the next two years or unforseen trade happens that push the timeline. Visibly we are not contending any time soon as we sit in August of 2023.
Knicks are fundamentally doing many roster things right. The money, the contract lengths, and we have assets to trade.

BigDaddyG @ 8/12/2023 10:01 AM
BigDaddyG @ 8/12/2023 10:15 AM
martin @ 8/12/2023 10:34 AM
No one is surprised

Rookie @ 8/12/2023 10:50 AM
martin wrote:No one is surprised

I'm shocked............that it's not his groin

Nalod @ 8/12/2023 11:24 AM
This guy either has a malformed muscle mass in his lower body or he is not putting in the work to stay pliable.
Hope he gets with a physiologist and figures this out. Hammy's are bad news. The higher the worse it is. Tear that off the bone and your likely done at the pro level.
Always rooting for frank. Few players make their mark on defense. I get his lack of confidence on Offense and we vilified him for it. For one of him there are dozens of "Triers" who can put the ball in the hoop but won't do the other things and play the right way. His crime was being picked 8th. Hope he can sort his body out and stick.
Perhaps we'd be all over McBride if he was taken high in the first round. But he is an underdog 2nd rounder and has a cool nick name. Fact is Miles was not highly touted out of high school and not introduced as the 18 year old Wunderkind from frane like frank was. "Deuce" had a break out in his sophomore season and was viewd as a 1st rounder if he stayed one more year. He came out knowing he was going to sit and develop. Macri interviewed his coach two years ago and it was a neat over view on the kid, his family, and status as a player. He too needs to get his offense going or this window will close soon. Second round players don't get the same money.
martin @ 8/12/2023 3:10 PM
martin @ 8/12/2023 4:58 PM
Oh yeah

Clean @ 8/12/2023 5:18 PM
martin @ 8/13/2023 4:29 PM
NICE!!!!

Page 3 of 16
Back to Knicks Forum
2024 © UltimateKnicks.com