Rookie wrote:RJ: hey coach I’m shooting 0% from 3
Thibs: well let’s get to back in there for crunch time
When RJ and Hartenstein are in the game we're playing three on five when we have the ball.
Thibs seriously needs to answer some questions on that sub. It literally lost us the game
Williams 40’ from the basket
RJ: I should foul him
As much as I like Brunson, SGA is the best player in the building.
WP76 wrote:As much as I like Brunson, SGA is the best player in the building.
Who did we draft over him again?
I’m so glad we beat the Bucks on Christmas.
I’m going to just forget this game ever happened.
Thanks RJ and Thibs!
I mean what the F is up with Thibs continuing to put RJ back in for IQ down the stretch.
IQ was red hot, playing well and when subbed in RJ was 3-12, 0-6 with 4 TO's.
RJ moving like a blanking sea turtle out of water.
ToddTT wrote:
This would be good substitution for IQ
BigDaddyG wrote:ToddTT wrote:[instagram]https://www.instagram.com/p/Cz9zrQyR4O1/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=YzZhZTZiNWI3Nw==[/instagram]
Healthy Midwestern girl.
[Instagram]https://www.instagram.com/p/CxgIN7-x-mU/?img_index=1[/Instagram]
Yea Todd
RJ with 5 field goals, and 5 turnovers. Sweet.
BigDaddyG wrote:WP76 wrote:As much as I like Brunson, SGA is the best player in the building.
Who did we draft over him again?
I just threw up a little in my mouth.
TheMTL wrote:Why did IQ get subbed out. And of course, it all goes to hell not even 1 minute later
I don't get it --- Thibs has some nerve when he does this. I'm be so embarrassed to make that move - perplexing.
BigDaddyG wrote:Rookie wrote:Que scrub #1 for a career high
Williams no scrub. I'd trade him for RJ straight up.
Yeah Williams is very good and he absolutely destroyed the RJ match up tonight --- had to check if RJ was wearing Herman Munster sneakers.
ToddTT wrote:Holmgren’s legs look impossibly thin.If he can stay healthy and add some weight, he’s going to be a problem for a long time.
Yes - toothpick thin and look ready to snap at slightest breeze but KD kind of similar and still cooking.
I haven't seen game yet... Grimes with only 11 minutes?
WP76 wrote:Rookie wrote:RJ: hey coach I’m shooting 0% from 3
Thibs: well let’s get to back in there for crunch time
When RJ and Hartenstein are in the game we're playing three on five when we have the ball.
Don't put Hartenstein in that sentence dude was only + in +/- tonight and can at least screen and pass unlike Mitchy.
LivingLegend wrote:ToddTT wrote:Holmgren’s legs look impossibly thin.If he can stay healthy and add some weight, he’s going to be a problem for a long time.
Yes - toothpick thin and look ready to snap at slightest breeze but KD kind of similar and still cooking.
Imagine how much he would've crapped on iHart if he had a stack of pancakes before the game.
ToddTT wrote:RJ with 5 field goals, and 5 turnovers. Sweet.
Really hoping we could maybe convince Hawks on RJ/Grimes (maybe Fournier) for Murray/Hunter package.
Keep IQ -- we get 3 guys who can get in the lane under control (Brunson/Murray/IQ) - replace RJ with someone who can defend a sign post.
martin wrote:I haven't seen game yet... Grimes with only 11 minutes?
I mean - he's kind of like a mouse and his D has slipped significantly IMO. Big chested strong legged kid and little to no physicality in his D any longer so Thibs is throwing minutes elsewhere.
Now just maybe there is stuff going on with trades -- ex. limiting Grimes/IQ minutes if they are involved or flip side trying act like RJ should be closing games.
BigDaddyG wrote:LivingLegend wrote:ToddTT wrote:Holmgren’s legs look impossibly thin.If he can stay healthy and add some weight, he’s going to be a problem for a long time.
Yes - toothpick thin and look ready to snap at slightest breeze but KD kind of similar and still cooking.
Imagine how much he would've crapped on iHart if he had a stack of pancakes before the game.
I mean - I thought we handled Holmgren and even Shea decently but we let the SF go for +35 without barely a miss.
Williams with 36 was +19 points over his 17 per game season avg.