Knicks · [GT 5/19/24 3:30PM ABC] R2G7 Knicks vs Pacers (page 12)
SergioNYK wrote:I still cannot believe we lost this series after being up 2-0 and 3-2 and got blown out at home in a Game 7.This will sting all summer.
If you say Mitch went down after game 1 and OG went down after game 2 and Brunson bang up his foot and Josh injured his ab it becomes more believable and stings less
Chandler wrote:Officiating sucked for sure whether JB getting no calls or Indy doing whatever it wanted especially after Carlisle hissy fitSuper reductionist but we were 2-0 with OG, 1-4 without (not counting game 7 as with OG).
Yeah I mean this is the story of the season is it not. We were a great team with an OG. Possibly an Elite team with OG and Randle. But - we were a .500 team during the run of games without Randle and OG. And we found ourselves with that roster in the playoffs. You can be a .500 team against the rest of the NBA, but if you're playing a playoff calendar team the record is going to be worse. And it was. The hope was to try and play 2-3 in the last 5 and get OG back and we went 1-4.
Game 3 was where the series was lost. There was an opportunity to steal that game and we ran out of gas. Lots of contributing factors to what hurt us there - bad offense, bad calls, bad luck - but ultimately not winning that one killed us as it bought time for the Pacers to understand how to exploit our depleted roster. In the end we didn't have the bodies to play with them except for one inspiring night at the garden.
Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/hoopmixonly/status/1792346093944201598?s=12
Click here to view the Tweet
martin wrote:It’s more glaring in hospital bobblehead’ish display versionJavascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/hoopmixonly/status/1792346093944201598?s=12
Click here to view the Tweet
Lets
not knock Indiana for being healthier. Health is an attribute that is as tangible as a jump shot. Every champ needs to get some luck. I wish em well. I recall when Atlanta with Tre Young beat us and they went on to the ECF, I think. Then they fell off the next season. I could see Indiana fall off next season as well. But for now, let em beat Boston.
SergioNYK wrote:I still cannot believe we lost this series after being up 2-0 and 3-2 and got blown out at home in a Game 7.This will sting all summer.
Why let it bother you for a day let alone all summer ? The Knicks players are over it already. They spending their loot on a vacation and probably popping champagne at a resort we could never dream of affording
Alpha1971 wrote:martin wrote:It’s more glaring in hospital bobblehead’ish display versionJavascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/hoopmixonly/status/1792346093944201598?s=12
Click here to view the TweetLets
not knock Indiana for being healthier. Health is an attribute that is as tangible as a jump shot. Every champ needs to get some luck. I wish em well. I recall when Atlanta with Tre Young beat us and they went on to the ECF, I think. Then they fell off the next season. I could see Indiana fall off next season as well. But for now, let em beat Boston.
No knock. They beat who was in front of them. But I will say a lot of players got hurt in the series they played. I didnt watch the Bucks series, but I watched a game where a game after Brunson hurt his foot, his defender stepped under him on a 3 in the first quarter and nothing was called. I'm watching alot of players get injured during Indy's run and at the very least raising an eye brow.
Watching game 7 I know the Knicks had more foul shots, but I would like to know how many favorable whistles that didn't result in foul shots went Indy's way.
Remember when Klay and Durant both broke enroute to its three peat?
Or how many times did a team with Chris Paul fail because he got hurt? Or James Harden?
Or Embiid.
You need good future sometimes to avoid a better team at full strength.
I saw DDV talking shit. I saw Miles Turner talking back. I saw Josh be very mouthy.
We took them to the brink when we were very much undermanned.
Lets not romanticize the notion that our knicks are total angels
Haliburton is obnoxious, but not dirty. He puts the ball in the basket and sets ups his mates. That he talks and won is really annoying.
I hope they annoy the crap out of Celtics and the Baaston fan base.
I'd rather lose to a fomitable foe then one than gets blown away in the next round. Maybe it validates our team just a bit.
Nalod wrote:The path to finals is often laden with luck. year after year teams get injuries and the path is broken. Some teams don't befall that and its magical.Remember when Klay and Durant both broke enroute to its three peat?
Or how many times did a team with Chris Paul fail because he got hurt? Or James Harden?
Or Embiid.
You need good future sometimes to avoid a better team at full strength.
I saw DDV talking shit. I saw Miles Turner talking back. I saw Josh be very mouthy.
We took them to the brink when we were very much undermanned.
Lets not romanticize the notion that our knicks are total angels
Haliburton is obnoxious, but not dirty. He puts the ball in the basket and sets ups his mates. That he talks and won is really annoying.I hope they annoy the crap out of Celtics and the Baaston fan base.
I'd rather lose to a fomitable foe then one than gets blown away in the next round. Maybe it validates our team just a bit.
Denver is the perfect example. 2 MVP seasons for Jokic were marred with injuries to his teammates and early playoff ousters. Then they finally get healthy and win the championship in the 3rd year of his peak prime. Boston was robbed of a chance to repeat with Pierce/KG because KG was hurt in year 2. This is basically the norm. Just like everything, eventually things even out. A year of this injury magnitude will likely be followed by some healthy runs.
I agree on the talking as well. We dished it out and got a little too cocky if we're being honest. Hart dissing Reggie in viral fashion and Donte calling them a soft team after going up 3-2. We gotta be able to take it if we're gonna dish it.
DLeethal wrote:Nalod wrote:The path to finals is often laden with luck. year after year teams get injuries and the path is broken. Some teams don't befall that and its magical.Remember when Klay and Durant both broke enroute to its three peat?
Or how many times did a team with Chris Paul fail because he got hurt? Or James Harden?
Or Embiid.
You need good future sometimes to avoid a better team at full strength.
I saw DDV talking shit. I saw Miles Turner talking back. I saw Josh be very mouthy.
We took them to the brink when we were very much undermanned.
Lets not romanticize the notion that our knicks are total angels
Haliburton is obnoxious, but not dirty. He puts the ball in the basket and sets ups his mates. That he talks and won is really annoying.I hope they annoy the crap out of Celtics and the Baaston fan base.
I'd rather lose to a fomitable foe then one than gets blown away in the next round. Maybe it validates our team just a bit.Denver is the perfect example. 2 MVP seasons for Jokic were marred with injuries to his teammates and early playoff ousters. Then they finally get healthy and win the championship in the 3rd year of his peak prime. Boston was robbed of a chance to repeat with Pierce/KG because KG was hurt in year 2. This is basically the norm. Just like everything, eventually things even out. A year of this injury magnitude will likely be followed by some healthy runs.
I agree on the talking as well. We dished it out and got a little too cocky if we're being honest. Hart dissing Reggie in viral fashion and Donte calling them a soft team after going up 3-2. We gotta be able to take it if we're gonna dish it.
"WE", im assuming a few fans here and there. I thought our guys were just fine and really did not think Indy was out of line. Not like we had Embiid or Dray slapping dudes testicles and talking shit.
The Reggie thing was fun and maybe Josh stepped over it a bit as it was during game time. No biggie either way.
Vs Philly we went after Embiid despite his bells palsey and knee pain. I'd expect Indy to go after our weaknesses and try to win.
Carlisle hissy fit after two games was between him and the league. We clocked them really good. I thought his praising of Thibs was quite telling and at the end of the the day he was doing his job and then gracious in winning complimented RECOGNIZING knicks injury deficiencies and the job he and the team did.
Not all might agree with this sentiment and prefer to be "bitter" but to each their own.
VDesai wrote:Chandler wrote:Officiating sucked for sure whether JB getting no calls or Indy doing whatever it wanted especially after Carlisle hissy fitSuper reductionist but we were 2-0 with OG, 1-4 without (not counting game 7 as with OG).
Yeah I mean this is the story of the season is it not. We were a great team with an OG. Possibly an Elite team with OG and Randle. But - we were a .500 team during the run of games without Randle and OG. And we found ourselves with that roster in the playoffs. You can be a .500 team against the rest of the NBA, but if you're playing a playoff calendar team the record is going to be worse. And it was. The hope was to try and play 2-3 in the last 5 and get OG back and we went 1-4.
Game 3 was where the series was lost. There was an opportunity to steal that game and we ran out of gas. Lots of contributing factors to what hurt us there - bad offense, bad calls, bad luck - but ultimately not winning that one killed us as it bought time for the Pacers to understand how to exploit our depleted roster. In the end we didn't have the bodies to play with them except for one inspiring night at the garden.
agree with all you say but i would add it was more than us not having the bodies. JB was harassed bullied and fouled sometimes for the full length of the court with no calls. Indiana came to the conclusion that they would throw 10 or 15 fouls his way if necessary but the refs swallowed their whistles. No other MVP-tier candidate has been treated this way even remotely. That wore him down and it hurt us as a team. Often we were playing offense with 8 seconds left. JJ and Doris (each with their own anti Knicks bias at points) were often saying they don't know what a foul is anymore because things were so out of whack
no one likes complaining about the refs and i think we all hoped we'd get past that but it was pretty ridiculous.
Chandler wrote:VDesai wrote:Chandler wrote:Officiating sucked for sure whether JB getting no calls or Indy doing whatever it wanted especially after Carlisle hissy fitSuper reductionist but we were 2-0 with OG, 1-4 without (not counting game 7 as with OG).
Yeah I mean this is the story of the season is it not. We were a great team with an OG. Possibly an Elite team with OG and Randle. But - we were a .500 team during the run of games without Randle and OG. And we found ourselves with that roster in the playoffs. You can be a .500 team against the rest of the NBA, but if you're playing a playoff calendar team the record is going to be worse. And it was. The hope was to try and play 2-3 in the last 5 and get OG back and we went 1-4.
Game 3 was where the series was lost. There was an opportunity to steal that game and we ran out of gas. Lots of contributing factors to what hurt us there - bad offense, bad calls, bad luck - but ultimately not winning that one killed us as it bought time for the Pacers to understand how to exploit our depleted roster. In the end we didn't have the bodies to play with them except for one inspiring night at the garden.
agree with all you say but i would add it was more than us not having the bodies. JB was harassed bullied and fouled sometimes for the full length of the court with no calls. Indiana came to the conclusion that they would throw 10 or 15 fouls his way if necessary but the refs swallowed their whistles. No other MVP-tier candidate has been treated this way even remotely. That wore him down and it hurt us as a team. Often we were playing offense with 8 seconds left. JJ and Doris (each with their own anti Knicks bias at points) were often saying they don't know what a foul is anymore because things were so out of whack
no one likes complaining about the refs and i think we all hoped we'd get past that but it was pretty ridiculous.
You sound worse than Carlisle did after game two.
No other MVP-Tier candidate ever been "Treated this way"? "That wore him down and it hurt us as a team.?
Indy smelled blood and went for the kill. We did it to Embiid and succeeded. Was it always fair? Not really.
Did Jalen get some calls also? You bet. Brunson perhaps try to hard to sell some of that contact? Looked good on TV.
I know your like the mostest of all super fan, but at any level are you objective in your pleas?
No one likes complaining about refs but there you are.
Carlisle drew your ire for advocating for his team. He is paid for it. Its his job.
He had video proof. You got yours?
Doris? Really?
Nalod wrote:Chandler wrote:VDesai wrote:Chandler wrote:Officiating sucked for sure whether JB getting no calls or Indy doing whatever it wanted especially after Carlisle hissy fitSuper reductionist but we were 2-0 with OG, 1-4 without (not counting game 7 as with OG).
Yeah I mean this is the story of the season is it not. We were a great team with an OG. Possibly an Elite team with OG and Randle. But - we were a .500 team during the run of games without Randle and OG. And we found ourselves with that roster in the playoffs. You can be a .500 team against the rest of the NBA, but if you're playing a playoff calendar team the record is going to be worse. And it was. The hope was to try and play 2-3 in the last 5 and get OG back and we went 1-4.
Game 3 was where the series was lost. There was an opportunity to steal that game and we ran out of gas. Lots of contributing factors to what hurt us there - bad offense, bad calls, bad luck - but ultimately not winning that one killed us as it bought time for the Pacers to understand how to exploit our depleted roster. In the end we didn't have the bodies to play with them except for one inspiring night at the garden.
agree with all you say but i would add it was more than us not having the bodies. JB was harassed bullied and fouled sometimes for the full length of the court with no calls. Indiana came to the conclusion that they would throw 10 or 15 fouls his way if necessary but the refs swallowed their whistles. No other MVP-tier candidate has been treated this way even remotely. That wore him down and it hurt us as a team. Often we were playing offense with 8 seconds left. JJ and Doris (each with their own anti Knicks bias at points) were often saying they don't know what a foul is anymore because things were so out of whack
no one likes complaining about the refs and i think we all hoped we'd get past that but it was pretty ridiculous.
You sound worse than Carlisle did after game two.
No other MVP-Tier candidate ever been "Treated this way"? "That wore him down and it hurt us as a team.?
Indy smelled blood and went for the kill. We did it to Embiid and succeeded. Was it always fair? Not really.
Did Jalen get some calls also? You bet. Brunson perhaps try to hard to sell some of that contact? Looked good on TV.
I know your like the mostest of all super fan, but at any level are you objective in your pleas?
No one likes complaining about refs but there you are.
Carlisle drew your ire for advocating for his team. He is paid for it. Its his job.
He had video proof. You got yours?
Doris? Really?
Embiid got a ton of FTs what are you talking about?
Are you seriously contending that JB was treated fairly; or that he got a fraction of the ref protection Embid did?
And if you didn't hear JJ and Doris each say this multiple times, that's on you. And any half-intelligent fan didn't need to hear it from them. He was fouled, bumped non-stop crossing over into dangerous territory at points by taking away his landing area.
You're allowed to think the refs didn't blow it at the end of game 3, but you'd be wrong, not enlightened.
Go on with your Socratic (yet illiterate) method of chiding us for not seeing things like you, questioning things like you. But also consider addressing the question to yourself -- maybe you're wrong, not us
and carlisle is a whiny bitch. what does paying for it have to do with anything. He was crying about a phantom double dribble being overturned. YOu going to say that was fine?
Did we try to take advantage of his pain? Of course we did. We won.
Im not trying to enlighten you, just point out your lack objectivity at times.
Refs miss calls but over a series do they get it about even?
A few punctual misses hardly makes anyone "Illiterate". Content matters. Objectively and facts matter.
Thank you for the compliment "Socratic". When I say I have more questions than answers your implying I am set on being "right" and should consider I am not? Really? Thats me saying I don't know, but some of your conclusions are not accurate or lack objectivity.
"Us"? Its not a blanket statement, there are views not personalities. I might agree with you on one post and not on another. Perhaps only one or two posters seem to get most of their stuff incorrect.
Dan Patrick railed ESPN broadcast of game 7 as being totally disrespectful to the Pacers. JJ and Doris gave major props to knicks efforts and not the excellence by the Pacers. They did of course point out it was a historically good shooting display in a game 7. Annoying as it is Halliburton smiling is taken as a "joy to play". Magic Johnson had that too. I respected him but did not like the clown act.
Homer in you thinks pacers should have been more humble given knicks injuries? I disagree. Despite knicks being shorthanded they came into MSG and won game 7. Its ok to disagree.
Rick Carlisle coached a team to a chip in Dallas. You see "Whiney Bitch", I see a guy doing his job. You see lack of humility on Dallas, but Carlisle flat out called Thibs "Best in business". The end of the series they all hugged it out and left it on the floor.
"Socratic", wow! Maybe Martin will let me change my name? "Citarcos"!
Nalod wrote:We defeated Philly despite Embiid's getting to the line. That was my point.
Did we try to take advantage of his pain? Of course we did. We won.
Im not trying to enlighten you, just point out your lack objectivity at times.
Refs miss calls but over a series do they get it about even?
A few punctual misses hardly makes anyone "Illiterate". Content matters. Objectively and facts matter.
Thank you for the compliment "Socratic". When I say I have more questions than answers your implying I am set on being "right" and should consider I am not? Really? Thats me saying I don't know, but some of your conclusions are not accurate or lack objectivity.
"Us"? Its not a blanket statement, there are views not personalities. I might agree with you on one post and not on another. Perhaps only one or two posters seem to get most of their stuff incorrect.
Dan Patrick railed ESPN broadcast of game 7 as being totally disrespectful to the Pacers. JJ and Doris gave major props to knicks efforts and not the excellence by the Pacers. They did of course point out it was a historically good shooting display in a game 7. Annoying as it is Halliburton smiling is taken as a "joy to play". Magic Johnson had that too. I respected him but did not like the clown act.
Homer in you thinks pacers should have been more humble given knicks injuries? I disagree. Despite knicks being shorthanded they came into MSG and won game 7. Its ok to disagree.Rick Carlisle coached a team to a chip in Dallas. You see "Whiney Bitch", I see a guy doing his job. You see lack of humility on Dallas, but Carlisle flat out called Thibs "Best in business". The end of the series they all hugged it out and left it on the floor.
"Socratic", wow! Maybe Martin will let me change my name? "Citarcos"!
if that was your point it was a dumb one. I'm saying objectively that JB got hosed. And your response is Embid got phantom calls and we still won. How is that even related -- it's the opposite.
i am not implying you're right. IN fact i think you're often wrong. WHat i'm saying is it's tiring to hear you constantly question people on the board whether they're thinking about things deep enough -- you know like you do. Except when you think deep, you come to the conclusion that because Embid went to the line a lot and we won, it's objectively correct that JB wasn't hosed.
Pacers should have been more humble. I'm not saying they shouldn't have been happy, but seriously wearing a Reggie sweatshirt with the choke sign when the Knicks were the exact opposite of choke. This just goes to show what i've been saying all along. YOu come to some conclusion that there's another side to the story, and the mere fact that there's another side makes it more worthy, and you're trying to enlighten us to that view. The reality is that sometime the other side really is the stupid side. Implying the Knicks choked is one of them. If you can't appreciate that maybe you should change your handle to "ymmud"
Anyway, I'm going to stop calling you out on this, but the lecturing tone from you is annoying especially when you're logic is weird
Chandler wrote:Nalod wrote:We defeated Philly despite Embiid's getting to the line. That was my point.
Did we try to take advantage of his pain? Of course we did. We won.
Im not trying to enlighten you, just point out your lack objectivity at times.
Refs miss calls but over a series do they get it about even?
A few punctual misses hardly makes anyone "Illiterate". Content matters. Objectively and facts matter.
Thank you for the compliment "Socratic". When I say I have more questions than answers your implying I am set on being "right" and should consider I am not? Really? Thats me saying I don't know, but some of your conclusions are not accurate or lack objectivity.
"Us"? Its not a blanket statement, there are views not personalities. I might agree with you on one post and not on another. Perhaps only one or two posters seem to get most of their stuff incorrect.
Dan Patrick railed ESPN broadcast of game 7 as being totally disrespectful to the Pacers. JJ and Doris gave major props to knicks efforts and not the excellence by the Pacers. They did of course point out it was a historically good shooting display in a game 7. Annoying as it is Halliburton smiling is taken as a "joy to play". Magic Johnson had that too. I respected him but did not like the clown act.
Homer in you thinks pacers should have been more humble given knicks injuries? I disagree. Despite knicks being shorthanded they came into MSG and won game 7. Its ok to disagree.Rick Carlisle coached a team to a chip in Dallas. You see "Whiney Bitch", I see a guy doing his job. You see lack of humility on Dallas, but Carlisle flat out called Thibs "Best in business". The end of the series they all hugged it out and left it on the floor.
"Socratic", wow! Maybe Martin will let me change my name? "Citarcos"!
if that was your point it was a dumb one. I'm saying objectively that JB got hosed. And your response is Embid got phantom calls and we still won. How is that even related -- it's the opposite.
i am not implying you're right. IN fact i think you're often wrong. WHat i'm saying is it's tiring to hear you constantly question people on the board whether they're thinking about things deep enough -- you know like you do. Except when you think deep, you come to the conclusion that because Embid went to the line a lot and we won, it's objectively correct that JB wasn't hosed.
Pacers should have been more humble. I'm not saying they shouldn't have been happy, but seriously wearing a Reggie sweatshirt with the choke sign when the Knicks were the exact opposite of choke. This just goes to show what i've been saying all along. YOu come to some conclusion that there's another side to the story, and the mere fact that there's another side makes it more worthy, and you're trying to enlighten us to that view. The reality is that sometime the other side really is the stupid side. Implying the Knicks choked is one of them. If you can't appreciate that maybe you should change your handle to "ymmud"
Anyway, I'm going to stop calling you out on this, but the lecturing tone from you is annoying especially when you're logic is weird
Haliburton wearing the choke sweatshirt about their just concluded series or a nod to Reggie back in the day.
You took it as knicks just choked the series?
Difference is you want to call me names, I comment on your content.
My logic is weird because you come from a "HomerCentric" side. Knicks get hosed, pacers should be Humble, and Carlisle is a whiney bitch. Things are unfair. They are. Your posts are whiney.
Bing Bong.
Nalod wrote:Chandler wrote:Nalod wrote:We defeated Philly despite Embiid's getting to the line. That was my point.
Did we try to take advantage of his pain? Of course we did. We won.
Im not trying to enlighten you, just point out your lack objectivity at times.
Refs miss calls but over a series do they get it about even?
A few punctual misses hardly makes anyone "Illiterate". Content matters. Objectively and facts matter.
Thank you for the compliment "Socratic". When I say I have more questions than answers your implying I am set on being "right" and should consider I am not? Really? Thats me saying I don't know, but some of your conclusions are not accurate or lack objectivity.
"Us"? Its not a blanket statement, there are views not personalities. I might agree with you on one post and not on another. Perhaps only one or two posters seem to get most of their stuff incorrect.
Dan Patrick railed ESPN broadcast of game 7 as being totally disrespectful to the Pacers. JJ and Doris gave major props to knicks efforts and not the excellence by the Pacers. They did of course point out it was a historically good shooting display in a game 7. Annoying as it is Halliburton smiling is taken as a "joy to play". Magic Johnson had that too. I respected him but did not like the clown act.
Homer in you thinks pacers should have been more humble given knicks injuries? I disagree. Despite knicks being shorthanded they came into MSG and won game 7. Its ok to disagree.Rick Carlisle coached a team to a chip in Dallas. You see "Whiney Bitch", I see a guy doing his job. You see lack of humility on Dallas, but Carlisle flat out called Thibs "Best in business". The end of the series they all hugged it out and left it on the floor.
"Socratic", wow! Maybe Martin will let me change my name? "Citarcos"!
if that was your point it was a dumb one. I'm saying objectively that JB got hosed. And your response is Embid got phantom calls and we still won. How is that even related -- it's the opposite.
i am not implying you're right. IN fact i think you're often wrong. WHat i'm saying is it's tiring to hear you constantly question people on the board whether they're thinking about things deep enough -- you know like you do. Except when you think deep, you come to the conclusion that because Embid went to the line a lot and we won, it's objectively correct that JB wasn't hosed.
Pacers should have been more humble. I'm not saying they shouldn't have been happy, but seriously wearing a Reggie sweatshirt with the choke sign when the Knicks were the exact opposite of choke. This just goes to show what i've been saying all along. YOu come to some conclusion that there's another side to the story, and the mere fact that there's another side makes it more worthy, and you're trying to enlighten us to that view. The reality is that sometime the other side really is the stupid side. Implying the Knicks choked is one of them. If you can't appreciate that maybe you should change your handle to "ymmud"
Anyway, I'm going to stop calling you out on this, but the lecturing tone from you is annoying especially when you're logic is weird
Haliburton wearing the choke sweatshirt about their just concluded series or a nod to Reggie back in the day.
You took it as knicks just choked the series?
Difference is you want to call me names, I comment on your content.
My logic is weird because you come from a "HomerCentric" side. Knicks get hosed, pacers should be Humble, and Carlisle is a whiney bitch. Things are unfair. They are. Your posts are whiney.
Bing Bong.
you took that differently, and you call yourself objective? hahaha
Chandler wrote:Nalod wrote:Chandler wrote:Nalod wrote:We defeated Philly despite Embiid's getting to the line. That was my point.
Did we try to take advantage of his pain? Of course we did. We won.
Im not trying to enlighten you, just point out your lack objectivity at times.
Refs miss calls but over a series do they get it about even?
A few punctual misses hardly makes anyone "Illiterate". Content matters. Objectively and facts matter.
Thank you for the compliment "Socratic". When I say I have more questions than answers your implying I am set on being "right" and should consider I am not? Really? Thats me saying I don't know, but some of your conclusions are not accurate or lack objectivity.
"Us"? Its not a blanket statement, there are views not personalities. I might agree with you on one post and not on another. Perhaps only one or two posters seem to get most of their stuff incorrect.
Dan Patrick railed ESPN broadcast of game 7 as being totally disrespectful to the Pacers. JJ and Doris gave major props to knicks efforts and not the excellence by the Pacers. They did of course point out it was a historically good shooting display in a game 7. Annoying as it is Halliburton smiling is taken as a "joy to play". Magic Johnson had that too. I respected him but did not like the clown act.
Homer in you thinks pacers should have been more humble given knicks injuries? I disagree. Despite knicks being shorthanded they came into MSG and won game 7. Its ok to disagree.Rick Carlisle coached a team to a chip in Dallas. You see "Whiney Bitch", I see a guy doing his job. You see lack of humility on Dallas, but Carlisle flat out called Thibs "Best in business". The end of the series they all hugged it out and left it on the floor.
"Socratic", wow! Maybe Martin will let me change my name? "Citarcos"!
if that was your point it was a dumb one. I'm saying objectively that JB got hosed. And your response is Embid got phantom calls and we still won. How is that even related -- it's the opposite.
i am not implying you're right. IN fact i think you're often wrong. WHat i'm saying is it's tiring to hear you constantly question people on the board whether they're thinking about things deep enough -- you know like you do. Except when you think deep, you come to the conclusion that because Embid went to the line a lot and we won, it's objectively correct that JB wasn't hosed.
Pacers should have been more humble. I'm not saying they shouldn't have been happy, but seriously wearing a Reggie sweatshirt with the choke sign when the Knicks were the exact opposite of choke. This just goes to show what i've been saying all along. YOu come to some conclusion that there's another side to the story, and the mere fact that there's another side makes it more worthy, and you're trying to enlighten us to that view. The reality is that sometime the other side really is the stupid side. Implying the Knicks choked is one of them. If you can't appreciate that maybe you should change your handle to "ymmud"
Anyway, I'm going to stop calling you out on this, but the lecturing tone from you is annoying especially when you're logic is weird
Haliburton wearing the choke sweatshirt about their just concluded series or a nod to Reggie back in the day.
You took it as knicks just choked the series?
Difference is you want to call me names, I comment on your content.
My logic is weird because you come from a "HomerCentric" side. Knicks get hosed, pacers should be Humble, and Carlisle is a whiney bitch. Things are unfair. They are. Your posts are whiney.
Bing Bong.you took that differently, and you call yourself objective? hahaha
That's kind of the definition of "Objective"
Nalod wrote:Chandler wrote:Nalod wrote:Chandler wrote:Nalod wrote:We defeated Philly despite Embiid's getting to the line. That was my point.
Did we try to take advantage of his pain? Of course we did. We won.
Im not trying to enlighten you, just point out your lack objectivity at times.
Refs miss calls but over a series do they get it about even?
A few punctual misses hardly makes anyone "Illiterate". Content matters. Objectively and facts matter.
Thank you for the compliment "Socratic". When I say I have more questions than answers your implying I am set on being "right" and should consider I am not? Really? Thats me saying I don't know, but some of your conclusions are not accurate or lack objectivity.
"Us"? Its not a blanket statement, there are views not personalities. I might agree with you on one post and not on another. Perhaps only one or two posters seem to get most of their stuff incorrect.
Dan Patrick railed ESPN broadcast of game 7 as being totally disrespectful to the Pacers. JJ and Doris gave major props to knicks efforts and not the excellence by the Pacers. They did of course point out it was a historically good shooting display in a game 7. Annoying as it is Halliburton smiling is taken as a "joy to play". Magic Johnson had that too. I respected him but did not like the clown act.
Homer in you thinks pacers should have been more humble given knicks injuries? I disagree. Despite knicks being shorthanded they came into MSG and won game 7. Its ok to disagree.Rick Carlisle coached a team to a chip in Dallas. You see "Whiney Bitch", I see a guy doing his job. You see lack of humility on Dallas, but Carlisle flat out called Thibs "Best in business". The end of the series they all hugged it out and left it on the floor.
"Socratic", wow! Maybe Martin will let me change my name? "Citarcos"!
if that was your point it was a dumb one. I'm saying objectively that JB got hosed. And your response is Embid got phantom calls and we still won. How is that even related -- it's the opposite.
i am not implying you're right. IN fact i think you're often wrong. WHat i'm saying is it's tiring to hear you constantly question people on the board whether they're thinking about things deep enough -- you know like you do. Except when you think deep, you come to the conclusion that because Embid went to the line a lot and we won, it's objectively correct that JB wasn't hosed.
Pacers should have been more humble. I'm not saying they shouldn't have been happy, but seriously wearing a Reggie sweatshirt with the choke sign when the Knicks were the exact opposite of choke. This just goes to show what i've been saying all along. YOu come to some conclusion that there's another side to the story, and the mere fact that there's another side makes it more worthy, and you're trying to enlighten us to that view. The reality is that sometime the other side really is the stupid side. Implying the Knicks choked is one of them. If you can't appreciate that maybe you should change your handle to "ymmud"
Anyway, I'm going to stop calling you out on this, but the lecturing tone from you is annoying especially when you're logic is weird
Haliburton wearing the choke sweatshirt about their just concluded series or a nod to Reggie back in the day.
You took it as knicks just choked the series?
Difference is you want to call me names, I comment on your content.
My logic is weird because you come from a "HomerCentric" side. Knicks get hosed, pacers should be Humble, and Carlisle is a whiney bitch. Things are unfair. They are. Your posts are whiney.
Bing Bong.you took that differently, and you call yourself objective? hahaha
That's kind of the definition of "Objective"
Say what? I'll go back to my illiterate comment and suggest you visit a dictionary
of all the reggie paraphernalia in the universe, haliburton chooses the one where reggie is giving the choke sign and you interpret that as him merely being supportive of reggie -- nothing more. I guess a reggie miller jersey or t shirt was unavailable
Nalod you're arguing a weak, dumb position
I love it. Hoping the Knicks can get closer to this.