Knicks · What you giving up for Mikal? (page 6)
The only thing would make sense is swapping for Randle. Not sure I love that but could get behind it if it happened.
DLeethal wrote:I just don't see how Mikal makes sense with all the guys who have earned solid mins on this roster. I think our roster has proven capable of being elite. Don't want to see DDV or Hart dwindled down to 15 mpg. Would rather fill in the gaps with quality depth, some youngins, and maybe find a spot for an elite bench weapon.he doesnt especially when you factor cost. Knicks dont need him, they just need to be healthy
DLeethal wrote:I just don't see how Mikal makes sense with all the guys who have earned solid mins on this roster. I think our roster has proven capable of being elite. Don't want to see DDV or Hart dwindled down to 15 mpg. Would rather fill in the gaps with quality depth, some youngins, and maybe find a spot for an elite bench weapon. He's a 3 that would be playing the 2 and DDV and his elite quick release volume 3 shooting would be downgraded in a huge way.The only thing would make sense is swapping for Randle. Not sure I love that but could get behind it if it happened.
the min would be there. Jhart and DDV probably get cut to 26 and 22mpg ish... but this is of course not factoring injuries. and heck with OG we could probably see Randle at the 5 in spurts which we did see the brief times we had a full roster, which would open up even more minutes at the Forward spots.
I think with a guy like Mikal you could keep Randle and OG around 32mpg and really preserve them more. Even Brunson can probably go down a bit to 33/34...
Randle/OG - 32/16
OG/Jhart/Mikal - 16/26/6
Mikal/DDV - 26/22
Brunson/Deuce or Rokas - 35/13
Bridges is the most durable guy on in the league and is on a much better contract. Do we honestly think OG can stay healthy throughout the playoffs?
It’s something to think about. When OG plays he’s fantastic, but elbow and then a hamstring in year one. You don’t want a situation like Paul George and Kawaii.
nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:I just don't see how Mikal makes sense with all the guys who have earned solid mins on this roster. I think our roster has proven capable of being elite. Don't want to see DDV or Hart dwindled down to 15 mpg. Would rather fill in the gaps with quality depth, some youngins, and maybe find a spot for an elite bench weapon. He's a 3 that would be playing the 2 and DDV and his elite quick release volume 3 shooting would be downgraded in a huge way.The only thing would make sense is swapping for Randle. Not sure I love that but could get behind it if it happened.
the min would be there. Jhart and DDV probably get cut to 26 and 22mpg ish... but this is of course not factoring injuries. and heck with OG we could probably see Randle at the 5 in spurts which we did see the brief times we had a full roster, which would open up even more minutes at the Forward spots.
I think with a guy like Mikal you could keep Randle and OG around 32mpg and really preserve them more. Even Brunson can probably go down a bit to 33/34...
Randle/OG - 32/16
OG/Jhart/Mikal - 16/26/6
Mikal/DDV - 26/22
Brunson/Deuce or Rokas - 35/13
I guess. I mean I can definitely see us overcompensating on depth after what happened this year. And if there is any way to get the guys to all sacrifice minutes it's to do it for their college teammates.
Part of me thinks if you give Thibs that roster he would mostly want to play Brunson - DDV/Hart - Mikal - OG - iHart though. Like if were gonna go for this why not just trade Randle and try to get Finney Smith back in the process?
DLeethal wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:I just don't see how Mikal makes sense with all the guys who have earned solid mins on this roster. I think our roster has proven capable of being elite. Don't want to see DDV or Hart dwindled down to 15 mpg. Would rather fill in the gaps with quality depth, some youngins, and maybe find a spot for an elite bench weapon. He's a 3 that would be playing the 2 and DDV and his elite quick release volume 3 shooting would be downgraded in a huge way.The only thing would make sense is swapping for Randle. Not sure I love that but could get behind it if it happened.
the min would be there. Jhart and DDV probably get cut to 26 and 22mpg ish... but this is of course not factoring injuries. and heck with OG we could probably see Randle at the 5 in spurts which we did see the brief times we had a full roster, which would open up even more minutes at the Forward spots.
I think with a guy like Mikal you could keep Randle and OG around 32mpg and really preserve them more. Even Brunson can probably go down a bit to 33/34...
Randle/OG - 32/16
OG/Jhart/Mikal - 16/26/6
Mikal/DDV - 26/22
Brunson/Deuce or Rokas - 35/13I guess. I mean I can definitely see us overcompensating on depth after what happened this year. And if there is any way to get the guys to all sacrifice minutes it's to do it for their college teammates.
Part of me thinks if you give Thibs that roster he would mostly want to play Brunson - DDV/Hart - Mikal - OG - iHart though. Like if were gonna go for this why not just trade Randle and try to get Finney Smith back in the process?
I mean it definitely makes letting Randle go even more of a possibility, but I do think the best course is stick with Randle for the last 2 years of his deal and see if he forces your hand at resigning him. if he doesn't, a guy like Mikal could definitely step in and we'd have the depth to absorb Rand;e's loss.
I mean if he walks at age 32 it might not be the worst thing.
DLeethal wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:I just don't see how Mikal makes sense with all the guys who have earned solid mins on this roster. I think our roster has proven capable of being elite. Don't want to see DDV or Hart dwindled down to 15 mpg. Would rather fill in the gaps with quality depth, some youngins, and maybe find a spot for an elite bench weapon. He's a 3 that would be playing the 2 and DDV and his elite quick release volume 3 shooting would be downgraded in a huge way.The only thing would make sense is swapping for Randle. Not sure I love that but could get behind it if it happened.
the min would be there. Jhart and DDV probably get cut to 26 and 22mpg ish... but this is of course not factoring injuries. and heck with OG we could probably see Randle at the 5 in spurts which we did see the brief times we had a full roster, which would open up even more minutes at the Forward spots.
I think with a guy like Mikal you could keep Randle and OG around 32mpg and really preserve them more. Even Brunson can probably go down a bit to 33/34...
Randle/OG - 32/16
OG/Jhart/Mikal - 16/26/6
Mikal/DDV - 26/22
Brunson/Deuce or Rokas - 35/13I guess. I mean I can definitely see us overcompensating on depth after what happened this year. And if there is any way to get the guys to all sacrifice minutes it's to do it for their college teammates.
Part of me thinks if you give Thibs that roster he would mostly want to play Brunson - DDV/Hart - Mikal - OG - iHart though. Like if were gonna go for this why not just trade Randle and try to get Finney Smith back in the process?
Thibs has never signalled that he doesn’t love Randle. To the contrary, Thibs has shown that he is 100% invested in developing Randle to reach his maximum potential. Randle is in his prime. A 100% bought in Randle is a force to be reckoned with and Thibs and the FO know this. Randle on his meds is a total beast.
nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:I just don't see how Mikal makes sense with all the guys who have earned solid mins on this roster. I think our roster has proven capable of being elite. Don't want to see DDV or Hart dwindled down to 15 mpg. Would rather fill in the gaps with quality depth, some youngins, and maybe find a spot for an elite bench weapon. He's a 3 that would be playing the 2 and DDV and his elite quick release volume 3 shooting would be downgraded in a huge way.The only thing would make sense is swapping for Randle. Not sure I love that but could get behind it if it happened.
the min would be there. Jhart and DDV probably get cut to 26 and 22mpg ish... but this is of course not factoring injuries. and heck with OG we could probably see Randle at the 5 in spurts which we did see the brief times we had a full roster, which would open up even more minutes at the Forward spots.
I think with a guy like Mikal you could keep Randle and OG around 32mpg and really preserve them more. Even Brunson can probably go down a bit to 33/34...
Randle/OG - 32/16
OG/Jhart/Mikal - 16/26/6
Mikal/DDV - 26/22
Brunson/Deuce or Rokas - 35/13I guess. I mean I can definitely see us overcompensating on depth after what happened this year. And if there is any way to get the guys to all sacrifice minutes it's to do it for their college teammates.
Part of me thinks if you give Thibs that roster he would mostly want to play Brunson - DDV/Hart - Mikal - OG - iHart though. Like if were gonna go for this why not just trade Randle and try to get Finney Smith back in the process?
I mean it definitely makes letting Randle go even more of a possibility, but I do think the best course is stick with Randle for the last 2 years of his deal and see if he forces your hand at resigning him. if he doesn't, a guy like Mikal could definitely step in and we'd have the depth to absorb Rand;e's loss.
I mean if he walks at age 32 it might not be the worst thing.
You guys are nuts to even think about those scenarios that would never ever even come close to taking place.
Legit nuts
martin wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:I just don't see how Mikal makes sense with all the guys who have earned solid mins on this roster. I think our roster has proven capable of being elite. Don't want to see DDV or Hart dwindled down to 15 mpg. Would rather fill in the gaps with quality depth, some youngins, and maybe find a spot for an elite bench weapon. He's a 3 that would be playing the 2 and DDV and his elite quick release volume 3 shooting would be downgraded in a huge way.The only thing would make sense is swapping for Randle. Not sure I love that but could get behind it if it happened.
the min would be there. Jhart and DDV probably get cut to 26 and 22mpg ish... but this is of course not factoring injuries. and heck with OG we could probably see Randle at the 5 in spurts which we did see the brief times we had a full roster, which would open up even more minutes at the Forward spots.
I think with a guy like Mikal you could keep Randle and OG around 32mpg and really preserve them more. Even Brunson can probably go down a bit to 33/34...
Randle/OG - 32/16
OG/Jhart/Mikal - 16/26/6
Mikal/DDV - 26/22
Brunson/Deuce or Rokas - 35/13I guess. I mean I can definitely see us overcompensating on depth after what happened this year. And if there is any way to get the guys to all sacrifice minutes it's to do it for their college teammates.
Part of me thinks if you give Thibs that roster he would mostly want to play Brunson - DDV/Hart - Mikal - OG - iHart though. Like if were gonna go for this why not just trade Randle and try to get Finney Smith back in the process?
I mean it definitely makes letting Randle go even more of a possibility, but I do think the best course is stick with Randle for the last 2 years of his deal and see if he forces your hand at resigning him. if he doesn't, a guy like Mikal could definitely step in and we'd have the depth to absorb Rand;e's loss.
I mean if he walks at age 32 it might not be the worst thing.
You guys are nuts to even think about those scenarios that would never ever even come close to taking place.
Legit nuts
Randle has been injured the past 2 playoffs, he'll have alot of miles on him. I don't think it's nuts at all to suggest that we don't give him a mega contract 2 seasons from now when he's turning 32. Sometimes there are tough decisions made and its better to get let a guy walk a year too early then a year too late.
He's elligible for an ext this offseason so if we don't give it to him I think that would be pretty telling.
nycericanguy wrote:martin wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:I just don't see how Mikal makes sense with all the guys who have earned solid mins on this roster. I think our roster has proven capable of being elite. Don't want to see DDV or Hart dwindled down to 15 mpg. Would rather fill in the gaps with quality depth, some youngins, and maybe find a spot for an elite bench weapon. He's a 3 that would be playing the 2 and DDV and his elite quick release volume 3 shooting would be downgraded in a huge way.The only thing would make sense is swapping for Randle. Not sure I love that but could get behind it if it happened.
the min would be there. Jhart and DDV probably get cut to 26 and 22mpg ish... but this is of course not factoring injuries. and heck with OG we could probably see Randle at the 5 in spurts which we did see the brief times we had a full roster, which would open up even more minutes at the Forward spots.
I think with a guy like Mikal you could keep Randle and OG around 32mpg and really preserve them more. Even Brunson can probably go down a bit to 33/34...
Randle/OG - 32/16
OG/Jhart/Mikal - 16/26/6
Mikal/DDV - 26/22
Brunson/Deuce or Rokas - 35/13I guess. I mean I can definitely see us overcompensating on depth after what happened this year. And if there is any way to get the guys to all sacrifice minutes it's to do it for their college teammates.
Part of me thinks if you give Thibs that roster he would mostly want to play Brunson - DDV/Hart - Mikal - OG - iHart though. Like if were gonna go for this why not just trade Randle and try to get Finney Smith back in the process?
I mean it definitely makes letting Randle go even more of a possibility, but I do think the best course is stick with Randle for the last 2 years of his deal and see if he forces your hand at resigning him. if he doesn't, a guy like Mikal could definitely step in and we'd have the depth to absorb Rand;e's loss.
I mean if he walks at age 32 it might not be the worst thing.
You guys are nuts to even think about those scenarios that would never ever even come close to taking place.
Legit nuts
Randle has been injured the past 2 playoffs, he'll have alot of miles on him. I don't think it's nuts at all to suggest that we don't give him a mega contract 2 seasons from now when he's turning 32. Sometimes there are tough decisions made and its better to get let a guy walk a year too early then a year too late.
He's elligible for an ext this offseason so if we don't give it to him I think that would be pretty telling.
It's failure to think in terms of letting an all NBA player *walk*. Period. All the injuries included. Including the injuries that really have nothing to do with a player having wear and tear where you should know better.
This is silly talk.
Randle is nowhere near the Chandler Parsons or KP territory.
Randle is 29.5yo today and he is not walking at 32. You would need to fire several layers of FO types who made that type of decision.
martin wrote:nycericanguy wrote:martin wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:I just don't see how Mikal makes sense with all the guys who have earned solid mins on this roster. I think our roster has proven capable of being elite. Don't want to see DDV or Hart dwindled down to 15 mpg. Would rather fill in the gaps with quality depth, some youngins, and maybe find a spot for an elite bench weapon. He's a 3 that would be playing the 2 and DDV and his elite quick release volume 3 shooting would be downgraded in a huge way.The only thing would make sense is swapping for Randle. Not sure I love that but could get behind it if it happened.
the min would be there. Jhart and DDV probably get cut to 26 and 22mpg ish... but this is of course not factoring injuries. and heck with OG we could probably see Randle at the 5 in spurts which we did see the brief times we had a full roster, which would open up even more minutes at the Forward spots.
I think with a guy like Mikal you could keep Randle and OG around 32mpg and really preserve them more. Even Brunson can probably go down a bit to 33/34...
Randle/OG - 32/16
OG/Jhart/Mikal - 16/26/6
Mikal/DDV - 26/22
Brunson/Deuce or Rokas - 35/13I guess. I mean I can definitely see us overcompensating on depth after what happened this year. And if there is any way to get the guys to all sacrifice minutes it's to do it for their college teammates.
Part of me thinks if you give Thibs that roster he would mostly want to play Brunson - DDV/Hart - Mikal - OG - iHart though. Like if were gonna go for this why not just trade Randle and try to get Finney Smith back in the process?
I mean it definitely makes letting Randle go even more of a possibility, but I do think the best course is stick with Randle for the last 2 years of his deal and see if he forces your hand at resigning him. if he doesn't, a guy like Mikal could definitely step in and we'd have the depth to absorb Rand;e's loss.
I mean if he walks at age 32 it might not be the worst thing.
You guys are nuts to even think about those scenarios that would never ever even come close to taking place.
Legit nuts
Randle has been injured the past 2 playoffs, he'll have alot of miles on him. I don't think it's nuts at all to suggest that we don't give him a mega contract 2 seasons from now when he's turning 32. Sometimes there are tough decisions made and its better to get let a guy walk a year too early then a year too late.
He's elligible for an ext this offseason so if we don't give it to him I think that would be pretty telling.
It's failure to think in terms of letting an all NBA player *walk*. Period. All the injuries included. Including the injuries that really have nothing to do with a player having wear and tear where you should know better.
This is silly talk.
Randle is nowhere near the Chandler Parsons or KP territory.
Randle is 29.5yo today and he is not walking at 32. You would need to fire several layers of FO types who made that type of decision.
Randle has never been a guy that is highly valued around the league, otherwise we'd probably have traded him already. I can see a scenario where we make a run with him these next 2 years and then let him walk, because sometimes letting a guy walk is better than taking $40m worth of mediocre player contracts.
No one said he was Parsons or KP btw... that's irrelevant. Just saying if you sign him to a mega deal at 32 you are very likely signing him for his declining years after already having gotten his best years.
nycericanguy wrote:martin wrote:nycericanguy wrote:martin wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:I just don't see how Mikal makes sense with all the guys who have earned solid mins on this roster. I think our roster has proven capable of being elite. Don't want to see DDV or Hart dwindled down to 15 mpg. Would rather fill in the gaps with quality depth, some youngins, and maybe find a spot for an elite bench weapon. He's a 3 that would be playing the 2 and DDV and his elite quick release volume 3 shooting would be downgraded in a huge way.The only thing would make sense is swapping for Randle. Not sure I love that but could get behind it if it happened.
the min would be there. Jhart and DDV probably get cut to 26 and 22mpg ish... but this is of course not factoring injuries. and heck with OG we could probably see Randle at the 5 in spurts which we did see the brief times we had a full roster, which would open up even more minutes at the Forward spots.
I think with a guy like Mikal you could keep Randle and OG around 32mpg and really preserve them more. Even Brunson can probably go down a bit to 33/34...
Randle/OG - 32/16
OG/Jhart/Mikal - 16/26/6
Mikal/DDV - 26/22
Brunson/Deuce or Rokas - 35/13I guess. I mean I can definitely see us overcompensating on depth after what happened this year. And if there is any way to get the guys to all sacrifice minutes it's to do it for their college teammates.
Part of me thinks if you give Thibs that roster he would mostly want to play Brunson - DDV/Hart - Mikal - OG - iHart though. Like if were gonna go for this why not just trade Randle and try to get Finney Smith back in the process?
I mean it definitely makes letting Randle go even more of a possibility, but I do think the best course is stick with Randle for the last 2 years of his deal and see if he forces your hand at resigning him. if he doesn't, a guy like Mikal could definitely step in and we'd have the depth to absorb Rand;e's loss.
I mean if he walks at age 32 it might not be the worst thing.
You guys are nuts to even think about those scenarios that would never ever even come close to taking place.
Legit nuts
Randle has been injured the past 2 playoffs, he'll have alot of miles on him. I don't think it's nuts at all to suggest that we don't give him a mega contract 2 seasons from now when he's turning 32. Sometimes there are tough decisions made and its better to get let a guy walk a year too early then a year too late.
He's elligible for an ext this offseason so if we don't give it to him I think that would be pretty telling.
It's failure to think in terms of letting an all NBA player *walk*. Period. All the injuries included. Including the injuries that really have nothing to do with a player having wear and tear where you should know better.
This is silly talk.
Randle is nowhere near the Chandler Parsons or KP territory.
Randle is 29.5yo today and he is not walking at 32. You would need to fire several layers of FO types who made that type of decision.
Randle has never been a guy that is highly valued around the league, otherwise we'd probably have traded him already. I can see a scenario where we make a run with him these next 2 years and then let him walk, because sometimes letting a guy walk is better than taking $40m worth of mediocre player contracts.
No one said he was Parsons or KP btw... that's irrelevant. Just saying if you sign him to a mega deal at 32 you are very likely signing him for his declining years after already having gotten his best years.
What? That does not make sense. Switch in any player name and read that sentence out loud and then think in terms of an infinite circle whose logic is build on itself only.
Randle has not been traded cause was too busy being the centerpiece we built and developed other players around. Duh.
martin wrote:nycericanguy wrote:martin wrote:nycericanguy wrote:martin wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:I just don't see how Mikal makes sense with all the guys who have earned solid mins on this roster. I think our roster has proven capable of being elite. Don't want to see DDV or Hart dwindled down to 15 mpg. Would rather fill in the gaps with quality depth, some youngins, and maybe find a spot for an elite bench weapon. He's a 3 that would be playing the 2 and DDV and his elite quick release volume 3 shooting would be downgraded in a huge way.The only thing would make sense is swapping for Randle. Not sure I love that but could get behind it if it happened.
the min would be there. Jhart and DDV probably get cut to 26 and 22mpg ish... but this is of course not factoring injuries. and heck with OG we could probably see Randle at the 5 in spurts which we did see the brief times we had a full roster, which would open up even more minutes at the Forward spots.
I think with a guy like Mikal you could keep Randle and OG around 32mpg and really preserve them more. Even Brunson can probably go down a bit to 33/34...
Randle/OG - 32/16
OG/Jhart/Mikal - 16/26/6
Mikal/DDV - 26/22
Brunson/Deuce or Rokas - 35/13I guess. I mean I can definitely see us overcompensating on depth after what happened this year. And if there is any way to get the guys to all sacrifice minutes it's to do it for their college teammates.
Part of me thinks if you give Thibs that roster he would mostly want to play Brunson - DDV/Hart - Mikal - OG - iHart though. Like if were gonna go for this why not just trade Randle and try to get Finney Smith back in the process?
I mean it definitely makes letting Randle go even more of a possibility, but I do think the best course is stick with Randle for the last 2 years of his deal and see if he forces your hand at resigning him. if he doesn't, a guy like Mikal could definitely step in and we'd have the depth to absorb Rand;e's loss.
I mean if he walks at age 32 it might not be the worst thing.
You guys are nuts to even think about those scenarios that would never ever even come close to taking place.
Legit nuts
Randle has been injured the past 2 playoffs, he'll have alot of miles on him. I don't think it's nuts at all to suggest that we don't give him a mega contract 2 seasons from now when he's turning 32. Sometimes there are tough decisions made and its better to get let a guy walk a year too early then a year too late.
He's elligible for an ext this offseason so if we don't give it to him I think that would be pretty telling.
It's failure to think in terms of letting an all NBA player *walk*. Period. All the injuries included. Including the injuries that really have nothing to do with a player having wear and tear where you should know better.
This is silly talk.
Randle is nowhere near the Chandler Parsons or KP territory.
Randle is 29.5yo today and he is not walking at 32. You would need to fire several layers of FO types who made that type of decision.
Randle has never been a guy that is highly valued around the league, otherwise we'd probably have traded him already. I can see a scenario where we make a run with him these next 2 years and then let him walk, because sometimes letting a guy walk is better than taking $40m worth of mediocre player contracts.
No one said he was Parsons or KP btw... that's irrelevant. Just saying if you sign him to a mega deal at 32 you are very likely signing him for his declining years after already having gotten his best years.
What? That does not make sense. Switch in any player name and read that sentence out loud and then think in terms of an infinite circle whose logic is build on itself only.
come on, Randle was on the block or available many times over the years according to reports. When has there ever been any reported interest in Randle in all these trades we tried to make or made?
You think he'd still be here if Utah wanted him for DM? Or if TOR wanted him for OG?
Numerous beat writers have always said Randle has more value to the knicks than other teams.
Even going back to his FA days, NOLA signed him for the MLE, then we signed him for MUCH less than max. Right or wrong he's just never seemed to be coveted as a true all star.
nycericanguy wrote:martin wrote:nycericanguy wrote:martin wrote:nycericanguy wrote:martin wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:I just don't see how Mikal makes sense with all the guys who have earned solid mins on this roster. I think our roster has proven capable of being elite. Don't want to see DDV or Hart dwindled down to 15 mpg. Would rather fill in the gaps with quality depth, some youngins, and maybe find a spot for an elite bench weapon. He's a 3 that would be playing the 2 and DDV and his elite quick release volume 3 shooting would be downgraded in a huge way.The only thing would make sense is swapping for Randle. Not sure I love that but could get behind it if it happened.
the min would be there. Jhart and DDV probably get cut to 26 and 22mpg ish... but this is of course not factoring injuries. and heck with OG we could probably see Randle at the 5 in spurts which we did see the brief times we had a full roster, which would open up even more minutes at the Forward spots.
I think with a guy like Mikal you could keep Randle and OG around 32mpg and really preserve them more. Even Brunson can probably go down a bit to 33/34...
Randle/OG - 32/16
OG/Jhart/Mikal - 16/26/6
Mikal/DDV - 26/22
Brunson/Deuce or Rokas - 35/13I guess. I mean I can definitely see us overcompensating on depth after what happened this year. And if there is any way to get the guys to all sacrifice minutes it's to do it for their college teammates.
Part of me thinks if you give Thibs that roster he would mostly want to play Brunson - DDV/Hart - Mikal - OG - iHart though. Like if were gonna go for this why not just trade Randle and try to get Finney Smith back in the process?
I mean it definitely makes letting Randle go even more of a possibility, but I do think the best course is stick with Randle for the last 2 years of his deal and see if he forces your hand at resigning him. if he doesn't, a guy like Mikal could definitely step in and we'd have the depth to absorb Rand;e's loss.
I mean if he walks at age 32 it might not be the worst thing.
You guys are nuts to even think about those scenarios that would never ever even come close to taking place.
Legit nuts
Randle has been injured the past 2 playoffs, he'll have alot of miles on him. I don't think it's nuts at all to suggest that we don't give him a mega contract 2 seasons from now when he's turning 32. Sometimes there are tough decisions made and its better to get let a guy walk a year too early then a year too late.
He's elligible for an ext this offseason so if we don't give it to him I think that would be pretty telling.
It's failure to think in terms of letting an all NBA player *walk*. Period. All the injuries included. Including the injuries that really have nothing to do with a player having wear and tear where you should know better.
This is silly talk.
Randle is nowhere near the Chandler Parsons or KP territory.
Randle is 29.5yo today and he is not walking at 32. You would need to fire several layers of FO types who made that type of decision.
Randle has never been a guy that is highly valued around the league, otherwise we'd probably have traded him already. I can see a scenario where we make a run with him these next 2 years and then let him walk, because sometimes letting a guy walk is better than taking $40m worth of mediocre player contracts.
No one said he was Parsons or KP btw... that's irrelevant. Just saying if you sign him to a mega deal at 32 you are very likely signing him for his declining years after already having gotten his best years.
What? That does not make sense. Switch in any player name and read that sentence out loud and then think in terms of an infinite circle whose logic is build on itself only.
come on, Randle was on the block or available many times over the years according to reports. When has there ever been any reported interest in Randle in all these trades we tried to make or made?
You think he'd still be here if Utah wanted him for DM? Or if TOR wanted him for OG?
Numerous beat writers have always said Randle has more value to the knicks than other teams.
Even going back to his FA days, NOLA signed him for the MLE, then we signed him for MUCH less than max. Right or wrong he's just never seemed to be coveted as a true all star.
Reports do not make FO decisions. You read reports and believe them whole heartedly to the point of making decisions on them. Do not be a click baiter.
Knicks FO has never wavered on Randle. Randle is a fucking all nba type and he is not walking.
Being offered to utah was not quite "on the block". Being shopped is on the block to me.
If Giannis is available and Bucks wants Randle as part of a package, perhaps you do that.
Otherwise you stay with him.
As for being let go to walk in Laker land and NOLA he never achieved all star or All NBA prior to being with Thibs as a knick. He has improved about every year and was killing it this season after a rusty start.
As for depth, DDV was off the bench to start the season. the Two Harts were off the bench. Thats three guys that became starters by seasons end.
You also had IQ!!!! WE had great depth!!! Next year all things being the same (It won't be) You still have one of Mitch or Isiah, Josh, Deuce and Bojan.
See how things shake out!
Rookie wrote:DLeethal wrote:nycericanguy wrote:DLeethal wrote:I just don't see how Mikal makes sense with all the guys who have earned solid mins on this roster. I think our roster has proven capable of being elite. Don't want to see DDV or Hart dwindled down to 15 mpg. Would rather fill in the gaps with quality depth, some youngins, and maybe find a spot for an elite bench weapon. He's a 3 that would be playing the 2 and DDV and his elite quick release volume 3 shooting would be downgraded in a huge way.The only thing would make sense is swapping for Randle. Not sure I love that but could get behind it if it happened.
the min would be there. Jhart and DDV probably get cut to 26 and 22mpg ish... but this is of course not factoring injuries. and heck with OG we could probably see Randle at the 5 in spurts which we did see the brief times we had a full roster, which would open up even more minutes at the Forward spots.
I think with a guy like Mikal you could keep Randle and OG around 32mpg and really preserve them more. Even Brunson can probably go down a bit to 33/34...
Randle/OG - 32/16
OG/Jhart/Mikal - 16/26/6
Mikal/DDV - 26/22
Brunson/Deuce or Rokas - 35/13I guess. I mean I can definitely see us overcompensating on depth after what happened this year. And if there is any way to get the guys to all sacrifice minutes it's to do it for their college teammates.
Part of me thinks if you give Thibs that roster he would mostly want to play Brunson - DDV/Hart - Mikal - OG - iHart though. Like if were gonna go for this why not just trade Randle and try to get Finney Smith back in the process?
Thibs has never signalled that he doesn’t love Randle. To the contrary, Thibs has shown that he is 100% invested in developing Randle to reach his maximum potential. Randle is in his prime. A 100% bought in Randle is a force to be reckoned with and Thibs and the FO know this. Randle on his meds is a total beast.
Thibs has never signaled he doesn't love any of these guys. Just saying with all of those guys on the same roster, wouldn't be crazy for Thibs to lean towards the crazy defense and shooting. Not saying Randle wouldn't get his mins, but would Thibs start to favor the Hart/Mikal/OG lineup to finish? He's had Hart finish games since he's been here no matter who's been on the team.
Nalod wrote:If I might, Both of you are sort of correct. Randle is not highly coveted but I don't think he was on the block.
Being offered to utah was not quite "on the block". Being shopped is on the block to me.
If Giannis is available and wants Randle as part of a package, perhaps you do that.
Otherwise you stay with him.
As for being let go to walk in Laker land and NOLA he never achieved all star or All NBA prior to being with Thibs as a knick. He has improved about every year and was killing it this season after a rusty start.As for depth, DDV was off the bench to start the season. the Two Harts were off the bench. Thats three guys that became starters by seasons end.
You also had IQ!!!! WE had great depth!!! Next year all things being the same (It won't be) You still have one of Mitch or Isiah, Josh, Deuce and Bojan.See how things shake out!
How do you begin to substantiate this?
How do you openly covet a player on another team who is not on the market?
I'd like to know.
The Knicks FO hasn't said one thing over the course of their engagement. Does that mean they do not covet? Or should they openly slobber over Brunson and OG and let everyone else know their plans?
DLeethal wrote:I'm not advocating for trading Randle - just saying if we have this embarrassment of riches lineup with Mikal, OG, Randle, Hart, DDV - Thibs is gonna have to remove one of Mikal/OG/Randle/Hart from the closing unit. We know he loves the intangibles of Hart down the stretch of games.
I think part of the reason Hart thrived so much during the playoffs is the same reason Brunson took a huge step: Randle wasn't around, and that's obviously not a negative on Randle, other guys needed to step up in his absence.
Knicks needed rebounding and intangibles cause one of their best players was missing in Randle.
martin wrote:Nalod wrote:If I might, Both of you are sort of correct. Randle is not highly coveted but I don't think he was on the block.
Being offered to utah was not quite "on the block". Being shopped is on the block to me.
If Giannis is available and wants Randle as part of a package, perhaps you do that.
Otherwise you stay with him.
As for being let go to walk in Laker land and NOLA he never achieved all star or All NBA prior to being with Thibs as a knick. He has improved about every year and was killing it this season after a rusty start.As for depth, DDV was off the bench to start the season. the Two Harts were off the bench. Thats three guys that became starters by seasons end.
You also had IQ!!!! WE had great depth!!! Next year all things being the same (It won't be) You still have one of Mitch or Isiah, Josh, Deuce and Bojan.See how things shake out!
How do you begin to substantiate this?
How do you openly covet a player on another team who is not on the market?
I'd like to know.
The Knicks FO hasn't said one thing over the course of their engagement. Does that mean they do not covet? Or should they openly slobber over Brunson and OG and let everyone else know their plans?
I am pretty good at this.
EwingsGlass wrote:martin wrote:Nalod wrote:If I might, Both of you are sort of correct. Randle is not highly coveted but I don't think he was on the block.
Being offered to utah was not quite "on the block". Being shopped is on the block to me.
If Giannis is available and wants Randle as part of a package, perhaps you do that.
Otherwise you stay with him.
As for being let go to walk in Laker land and NOLA he never achieved all star or All NBA prior to being with Thibs as a knick. He has improved about every year and was killing it this season after a rusty start.As for depth, DDV was off the bench to start the season. the Two Harts were off the bench. Thats three guys that became starters by seasons end.
You also had IQ!!!! WE had great depth!!! Next year all things being the same (It won't be) You still have one of Mitch or Isiah, Josh, Deuce and Bojan.See how things shake out!
How do you begin to substantiate this?
How do you openly covet a player on another team who is not on the market?
I'd like to know.
The Knicks FO hasn't said one thing over the course of their engagement. Does that mean they do not covet? Or should they openly slobber over Brunson and OG and let everyone else know their plans?
I am pretty good at this.
Is it called the Rebecca Harlow syndrome?