Knicks · GT Knicks @ Hawks 7:30PM (page 7)
martin wrote:LivingLegend wrote:martin wrote:Clean wrote:I think they are personally invested in Sims. They thought they would have to rely on him so they put in a lot of work to prepare him in the offseason. They will give him every chance to figure it out before they give Huk consistant minutes. I am just glad we got a decent player out of our late 2nd in Huk who will eventually takeover.You have to be, and the Knicks have a script for that type of guy and opportunity. Same with Grimes, Cam, etc. Guys will get 10+ games when the coaches think they are ready, and they will get pretty much the same minutes and role and expectations.
This is Sims' chance. Huk is their long game. This is what everyone really should want for our players.
Some times, Deuce takes 2+ years of this type of thing before something clicks. Maybe that is the same for Sims.
In season development.
It's obvious Thibs is in Sims corner and giving him a chance but Sims looks almost exactly same as 1st day on court as a rookie.
He is a big that can't score and does NOT protect the rim. He's always in the area but rarely impactful. Criticize Kat defense all we want but he's hauling in +12 boards and putting up nights of 34, 44 - etc. Sims is also I think 6'9" -- with his hair.
Maybe Precious is the key - not sure.
It took 2 years of Deuce deucing it up before he was good. And then it still took him until January to really get his minutes and show his stuff. 2 and a half years.
Sims has really not had any court time yet. Other guys need to get Sims looks at the rim, and Brunson keeps not doing that IMHO
Agree on Brunson point - it's very frustrating watching some of his decisions early on.
On Deuce/Sims compare --- I don't know. If you watched Deuce in college he was very good scorer/shooter - particularly in mid-range. I think his issue was building confidence, depth/distance and getting his body physically ready for the league. Court awareness was never an issue with Deuce - though we did try to force him into a PG role which isn't a great fit.
With Sims - correct me if I'm wrong - I think he played 4 college years and is now year 4. Physical tools were never the issue but even after 7 years of college/pro's the kid literally has nothing in his bag outside of a gather, collect and dunk with 2 hands (that is it). But that isn't my biggest problem with Jerico (again after 7 years) he doesn't recognize actions and is seemingly always 1/2 second/step late to contest or make a play. Last night during game (D. Wilkins - Hawks broadcast) specifically called out and replayed Sims getting rebound under the hoop and never looking at the basket or thinking of putting ball in the hoop. Just 1 example but pretty much what he does.
Deuce is 24 and Sims 26.
Also - Sims is short for his position (measured 6'9" at the combine).
Not saying he can't make a jump I just really doubt it's coming -- think he is simply filling time waiting for Precious/Mitch and even for Thibs to build Huck trust.
SergioNYK wrote:Nalod wrote:and Quinn is a really good coach and his team had a good night.
2-2 on road trip. KAT offense is unleashed. Jalen is out of sorts. He on record saying he was more concerned with getting KAT more touches.
Looking good.
He is not getting the calls from last year,, nobody is. They have to figure out how to make the game easier for him.
After 0-3 start you got the typical OG output.
Hawks made life hard for Mikal.
10min for Sims, 9 for Kolek and 28min for Deuce. I'd say knicks got tired and thus sloppy.
Thibs being Thibs or Thibs seeing his bench is quite thin. Why they there if not to play?
Thibs plays to win.
1. Blow it up? Two bad road losses after two wins? Naw. Wait a week or so? LOL.
2. Blame Thibs? Matt Ryan not ready to play and needs more practice time I suppose.
3. Not going to beat Celtics? Not sure that was ever in the cards this season as teams need time to gel and get depth.Some are so fickle and have no patience. Already questioning Brunson! It's very annoying! Considering this was expected before the season. Everyone and their mother knew we'd be a .500 or so team until we mesh and jell as a team. Thibs teams don't get going until after the New Year anyways.
I think the critiques (at least in my case) are more so observations that he is missing basic reads and playing too much iso. It's really pretty apparent so far and he's even struggling to get the ball up against pressure and initiate sets.
Does that mean he won't figure it out? No.
The thing is - we really don't need him searching for 30 and 40 point nights now --- we need him taking good shots and initiating offense for EVERYONE. If he averages 20-8 and has the ball flying around the court - we are golden but him putting up 35-40 point games isn't the right avenue with this squad. Again - IMO.
martin wrote:Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/BenRitholtzNBA/status/1854550368895516847
Click here to view the Tweet
Exactly what I just said in earlier post -- our 3 wing defenders are not playing solid perimeter D (more on Bridges/Hart in my view).
Could Kat step up and contest better on 1st -- ABSOLUTELY but he's not the one with the defensive reputation like OG/Mikal/Josh.
franco12 wrote:Nalod wrote:and Quinn is a really good coach and his team had a good night.
2-2 on road trip. KAT offense is unleashed. Jalen is out of sorts. He on record saying he was more concerned with getting KAT more touches.
Looking good.
He is not getting the calls from last year,, nobody is. They have to figure out how to make the game easier for him.
After 0-3 start you got the typical OG output.
Hawks made life hard for Mikal.
10min for Sims, 9 for Kolek and 28min for Deuce. I'd say knicks got tired and thus sloppy.
Thibs being Thibs or Thibs seeing his bench is quite thin. Why they there if not to play?
Thibs plays to win.
1. Blow it up? Two bad road losses after two wins? Naw. Wait a week or so? LOL.
2. Blame Thibs? Matt Ryan not ready to play and needs more practice time I suppose.
3. Not going to beat Celtics? Not sure that was ever in the cards this season as teams need time to gel and get depth.How are we tired? Honestly, I agree - they have no energy out there.
We’ve played 7 games. Cleveland is 9 & 0.
I admit we are short handed and guys might still be trying to work themselves into shape (Brunson?).
But if this is happening now, 7 games in, what the F happens in January? Are we counting on M Rob to put up big minutes? Because he’ll be winded after 5 minutes on the court?
We haven’t had any back to backs or rough stretch’s of multiple games in a few nights.
Inexcusable that anyone is ‘tired’. And I’m not directing this at you Nalod- just using this as yes- they have looked tired.
And the road trip is 4 games and most were in the eastern half of the country. What happens when they go to the west coast and Texas?
For the last few games it seems knick starters are playing 38-41 min a game. On the road.
Our bench? Outside of deuce nothing significant.
What happens if this is not fixed? Statistically injuries will happen at a higher frequency. We either start getting guys back, go deep into the bench, sign guys not on rosters, or make trades because trades always improve things !! LOL. They don't.
This is how I see it. Can't bank on Shamet to "come back" cuz he was never really in. Precious is still a way. I suppose Cam is day to day?
Thibs has to decide we lose cuz we tired or we loose with Dadiet.
Why not play Huk because we not winning anyway? Thats always a good fan answer.
LivingLegend wrote:martin wrote:Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/BenRitholtzNBA/status/1854550368895516847
Click here to view the TweetExactly what I just said in earlier post -- our 3 wing defenders are not playing solid perimeter D (more on Bridges/Hart in my view).
Could Kat step up and contest better on 1st -- ABSOLUTELY but he's not the one with the defensive reputation like OG/Mikal/Josh.
I love Mikal. He will get it together. Clearly struggling as a Knick on rotations and switches. Needs tape and time.
Nalod wrote:franco12 wrote:Nalod wrote:and Quinn is a really good coach and his team had a good night.
2-2 on road trip. KAT offense is unleashed. Jalen is out of sorts. He on record saying he was more concerned with getting KAT more touches.
Looking good.
He is not getting the calls from last year,, nobody is. They have to figure out how to make the game easier for him.
After 0-3 start you got the typical OG output.
Hawks made life hard for Mikal.
10min for Sims, 9 for Kolek and 28min for Deuce. I'd say knicks got tired and thus sloppy.
Thibs being Thibs or Thibs seeing his bench is quite thin. Why they there if not to play?
Thibs plays to win.
1. Blow it up? Two bad road losses after two wins? Naw. Wait a week or so? LOL.
2. Blame Thibs? Matt Ryan not ready to play and needs more practice time I suppose.
3. Not going to beat Celtics? Not sure that was ever in the cards this season as teams need time to gel and get depth.How are we tired? Honestly, I agree - they have no energy out there.
We’ve played 7 games. Cleveland is 9 & 0.
I admit we are short handed and guys might still be trying to work themselves into shape (Brunson?).
But if this is happening now, 7 games in, what the F happens in January? Are we counting on M Rob to put up big minutes? Because he’ll be winded after 5 minutes on the court?
We haven’t had any back to backs or rough stretch’s of multiple games in a few nights.
Inexcusable that anyone is ‘tired’. And I’m not directing this at you Nalod- just using this as yes- they have looked tired.
And the road trip is 4 games and most were in the eastern half of the country. What happens when they go to the west coast and Texas?
For the last few games it seems knick starters are playing 38-41 min a game. On the road.
Our bench? Outside of deuce nothing significant.What happens if this is not fixed? Statistically injuries will happen at a higher frequency. We either start getting guys back, go deep into the bench, sign guys not on rosters, or make trades because trades always improve things !! LOL. They don't.
This is how I see it. Can't bank on Shamet to "come back" cuz he was never really in. Precious is still a way. I suppose Cam is day to day?
Thibs has to decide we lose cuz we tired or we loose with Dadiet.
Why not play Huk because we not winning anyway? Thats always a good fan answer.
Fan answer? How about Atlanta going with Zaccharie Risacher for 37 minutes- yes, he has more talent than the guys we picked- but he is 19. Is he mistake free? Would Thibs even give him 10 minutes in a game?
It’s early- but I see a play in team if they are lucky.
franco12 wrote:Nalod wrote:franco12 wrote:Nalod wrote:and Quinn is a really good coach and his team had a good night.
2-2 on road trip. KAT offense is unleashed. Jalen is out of sorts. He on record saying he was more concerned with getting KAT more touches.
Looking good.
He is not getting the calls from last year,, nobody is. They have to figure out how to make the game easier for him.
After 0-3 start you got the typical OG output.
Hawks made life hard for Mikal.
10min for Sims, 9 for Kolek and 28min for Deuce. I'd say knicks got tired and thus sloppy.
Thibs being Thibs or Thibs seeing his bench is quite thin. Why they there if not to play?
Thibs plays to win.
1. Blow it up? Two bad road losses after two wins? Naw. Wait a week or so? LOL.
2. Blame Thibs? Matt Ryan not ready to play and needs more practice time I suppose.
3. Not going to beat Celtics? Not sure that was ever in the cards this season as teams need time to gel and get depth.How are we tired? Honestly, I agree - they have no energy out there.
We’ve played 7 games. Cleveland is 9 & 0.
I admit we are short handed and guys might still be trying to work themselves into shape (Brunson?).
But if this is happening now, 7 games in, what the F happens in January? Are we counting on M Rob to put up big minutes? Because he’ll be winded after 5 minutes on the court?
We haven’t had any back to backs or rough stretch’s of multiple games in a few nights.
Inexcusable that anyone is ‘tired’. And I’m not directing this at you Nalod- just using this as yes- they have looked tired.
And the road trip is 4 games and most were in the eastern half of the country. What happens when they go to the west coast and Texas?
For the last few games it seems knick starters are playing 38-41 min a game. On the road.
Our bench? Outside of deuce nothing significant.What happens if this is not fixed? Statistically injuries will happen at a higher frequency. We either start getting guys back, go deep into the bench, sign guys not on rosters, or make trades because trades always improve things !! LOL. They don't.
This is how I see it. Can't bank on Shamet to "come back" cuz he was never really in. Precious is still a way. I suppose Cam is day to day?
Thibs has to decide we lose cuz we tired or we loose with Dadiet.
Why not play Huk because we not winning anyway? Thats always a good fan answer.Fan answer? How about Atlanta going with Zaccharie Risacher for 37 minutes- yes, he has more talent than the guys we picked- but he is 19. Is he mistake free? Would Thibs even give him 10 minutes in a game?
It’s early- but I see a play in team if they are lucky.
Given the status of the south east division they should be thee. I'd expect Orlando to pick it up.
HofstraBBall wrote:franco12 wrote:LivingLegend wrote:- Brunson bad tonight - continuing to hunt his own shots. 4 assists and 3 TO's but many hopeless possessions.
- Hart out of control - destroyed by French rookie
- Mikal invisible
- Sims invisible
- Towns I thought was great BUT with less than attractive D
- Deuce nice shooting but lost 2 balls just carelessly
- Hawks young wings were LONG and tough on D --- TBH they were more impressive than Mikal/OG. Mikal getting beat all over.Offense moved well without Brunson on the floor - it's bogging down when he's on (clunky, clogged). Kolek with 2 nice buckets but beat back-door and yanked immediately -- meanwhile everyone else on floor beat all night.
Far too sloppy on D, we seem small on the boards even with Kat grabbing 16 boards --- I don't like the Hart fit with starting group (too sloppy) and if you start running Hart out their for 35/40 every night I think there are declining returns
This was always my problem with Thibs as a coach- rookie makes mistake, and he is out. Other veterans make same mistake, they’re playing 40 minutes.
I guess we don’t have enough players for Thibs to do this.
Randle was not good on D- but the dude was intense. I think that is what this group is missing.
Too soon to blow this up?
Don’t see why it’s surprising that a first year player has less rope than multi year producers?
Blow this up? That’s a pretty big knee jerk.
Was not a fan of the big trade. Thought we lost two dogs that were gamers.
However, Watching the first unit , we are a better team. Lots of positives.
KAT is starting to get comfortable and looking for his offense more. JB is JB. May need to get some more PG duties on his mind. Ie. Getting others going early. Side pieces have been looking and getting their shots. (OG, Bridges, Hart)
Was Not a fan of what we gave up for Bridges or what some pegged Bridges to be.
However, very impressed with his Defense and his mid range. Feel he just has to stop with the quick contested threes.Right now the key is depth. We came of a night where our bench scored 3 points?
Simms has been absent, Deuce inconsistent and Payne hurt.
Team needs depth to get healthy and first unit to continue to gel.
Both things that are sure to happen.
Agree with everything bolded....I mentioned in another thread that despite some of the inconsistencies on the offensive side of the ball, we are still the 4th best offensive team in the league (FG%) and 1st in 3 pt%. The ball and player movement and the shooting that we have seen in spurts is some of the best basketball I've seen from a Knicks team in a very long time. We have a bunch of high IQ players on this team and I think its just a matter of time before we see more consistency on the offensive side.
Defense is my biggest concern, and I think getting our bench healthy, Precious soon and Mitch in January will help a ton. Both will help on the boards and I would love to see Precious get some mins here and there with Towns to give us some more size. Also, speaking of chemistry, Mikal and OG need to get on the same page too....it takes time.
Uptown wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:franco12 wrote:LivingLegend wrote:- Brunson bad tonight - continuing to hunt his own shots. 4 assists and 3 TO's but many hopeless possessions.
- Hart out of control - destroyed by French rookie
- Mikal invisible
- Sims invisible
- Towns I thought was great BUT with less than attractive D
- Deuce nice shooting but lost 2 balls just carelessly
- Hawks young wings were LONG and tough on D --- TBH they were more impressive than Mikal/OG. Mikal getting beat all over.Offense moved well without Brunson on the floor - it's bogging down when he's on (clunky, clogged). Kolek with 2 nice buckets but beat back-door and yanked immediately -- meanwhile everyone else on floor beat all night.
Far too sloppy on D, we seem small on the boards even with Kat grabbing 16 boards --- I don't like the Hart fit with starting group (too sloppy) and if you start running Hart out their for 35/40 every night I think there are declining returns
This was always my problem with Thibs as a coach- rookie makes mistake, and he is out. Other veterans make same mistake, they’re playing 40 minutes.
I guess we don’t have enough players for Thibs to do this.
Randle was not good on D- but the dude was intense. I think that is what this group is missing.
Too soon to blow this up?
Don’t see why it’s surprising that a first year player has less rope than multi year producers?
Blow this up? That’s a pretty big knee jerk.
Was not a fan of the big trade. Thought we lost two dogs that were gamers.
However, Watching the first unit , we are a better team. Lots of positives.
KAT is starting to get comfortable and looking for his offense more. JB is JB. May need to get some more PG duties on his mind. Ie. Getting others going early. Side pieces have been looking and getting their shots. (OG, Bridges, Hart)
Was Not a fan of what we gave up for Bridges or what some pegged Bridges to be.
However, very impressed with his Defense and his mid range. Feel he just has to stop with the quick contested threes.Right now the key is depth. We came of a night where our bench scored 3 points?
Simms has been absent, Deuce inconsistent and Payne hurt.
Team needs depth to get healthy and first unit to continue to gel.
Both things that are sure to happen.Agree with everything bolded....I mentioned in another thread that despite some of the inconsistencies on the offensive side of the ball, we are still the 4th best offensive team in the league (FG%) and 1st in 3 pt%. The ball and player movement and the shooting that we have seen in spurts is some of the best basketball I've seen from a Knicks team in a very long time. We have a bunch of high IQ players on this team and I think its just a matter of time before we see more consistency on the offensive side.
Defense is my biggest concern, and I think getting our bench healthy, Precious soon and Mitch in January will help a ton. Both will help on the boards and I would love to see Precious get some mins here and there with Towns to give us some more size. Also, speaking of chemistry, Mikal and OG need to get on the same page too....it takes time.
We are basically last year's Milwaukee Bucks. Are wings are supposed to make up for the lack of rim protection and they're not doing that. Now, I know some of you are in love with 5 out offense. But the thing we're missing right now that Boston has is premium rim protection. KP provides that and three points shooting. The Knicks basically have to perfect in their defensive rotations to make up for that and that kind of defensive resonance takes time, if it happens at all. I think this team needs to go PF KAT if Mitch returns.
i got the sense we were taking some possessions off. Teams are going to play harder against us, not just give up because on paper we're supposedly better. Somehow we made their rookie look like an instant all star after an entitely underwhelming beginning of his career.
complete knee jerk but are we missing Johnny Flynn? He was always running up to Thibs with some observation or another. Now Mo Cheeks is half asleep
We'll get it sorted out but I hope soon.
LivingLegend wrote:martin wrote:LivingLegend wrote:martin wrote:Clean wrote:I think they are personally invested in Sims. They thought they would have to rely on him so they put in a lot of work to prepare him in the offseason. They will give him every chance to figure it out before they give Huk consistant minutes. I am just glad we got a decent player out of our late 2nd in Huk who will eventually takeover.You have to be, and the Knicks have a script for that type of guy and opportunity. Same with Grimes, Cam, etc. Guys will get 10+ games when the coaches think they are ready, and they will get pretty much the same minutes and role and expectations.
This is Sims' chance. Huk is their long game. This is what everyone really should want for our players.
Some times, Deuce takes 2+ years of this type of thing before something clicks. Maybe that is the same for Sims.
In season development.
It's obvious Thibs is in Sims corner and giving him a chance but Sims looks almost exactly same as 1st day on court as a rookie.
He is a big that can't score and does NOT protect the rim. He's always in the area but rarely impactful. Criticize Kat defense all we want but he's hauling in +12 boards and putting up nights of 34, 44 - etc. Sims is also I think 6'9" -- with his hair.
Maybe Precious is the key - not sure.
It took 2 years of Deuce deucing it up before he was good. And then it still took him until January to really get his minutes and show his stuff. 2 and a half years.
Sims has really not had any court time yet. Other guys need to get Sims looks at the rim, and Brunson keeps not doing that IMHO
Agree on Brunson point - it's very frustrating watching some of his decisions early on.
On Deuce/Sims compare --- I don't know. If you watched Deuce in college he was very good scorer/shooter - particularly in mid-range. I think his issue was building confidence, depth/distance and getting his body physically ready for the league. Court awareness was never an issue with Deuce - though we did try to force him into a PG role which isn't a great fit.
With Sims - correct me if I'm wrong - I think he played 4 college years and is now year 4. Physical tools were never the issue but even after 7 years of college/pro's the kid literally has nothing in his bag outside of a gather, collect and dunk with 2 hands (that is it). But that isn't my biggest problem with Jerico (again after 7 years) he doesn't recognize actions and is seemingly always 1/2 second/step late to contest or make a play. Last night during game (D. Wilkins - Hawks broadcast) specifically called out and replayed Sims getting rebound under the hoop and never looking at the basket or thinking of putting ball in the hoop. Just 1 example but pretty much what he does.
Deuce is 24 and Sims 26.
Also - Sims is short for his position (measured 6'9" at the combine).
Not saying he can't make a jump I just really doubt it's coming -- think he is simply filling time waiting for Precious/Mitch and even for Thibs to build Huck trust.
My suggestion is that even a pretty high level performer in college took a long time to figure things out, and even with plenty of awful moments during his first 2 years, the Knicks kept with him and knew he needed both time and a chance to prove himself.
No guarantees of success, just like Grimes, but you need to give the guys opportunities to fail and learn.
Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/iqfor3/status/1854625329404387640?s=61&t=X2NvaBkjFz8kZPoGlCbCzA
Click here to view the Tweet
Javascript is not enabled or there was problem with the URL: https://www.twitter.com/knicksmuse/status/1854622497615777885?s=61&t=X2NvaBkjFz8kZPoGlCbCzA
Click here to view the Tweet
We could just avoid switching... but that won't get us to our max potential.
We've been giving up a lot of points in spite of our tools.
Plus... given our offensive tools, we're not firing on all cylinders - we need time to get a feel of when to take it to the defense, vs just firing the open 3.
Modern analytics says take the open 3 when it's there, esp when the defense isn't set. But it also means that the defense doesn't have to work on that possession and they're fresh to attack when they get the ball back.